0.0C anomaly. In Fahrenheit that would be approximately 0.0F.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
Recent Comments
- arn on “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- conrad ziefle on “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Bob G on “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Bob G on Diversity Is Our Strength
- Tony Heller on Diversity Is Our Strength
- Scissor on Diversity Is Our Strength
- Scissor on Diversity Is Our Strength
- conrad ziefle on Diversity Is Our Strength
- dearieme on Diversity Is Our Strength
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
But in Hansenius, that’s at least 5 degrees…… +5H
lol, it was nice of you to offer the Celsius to Fahrenheit conversion for free!
I used my calculator.
LOL it was very funny!
Andy W would only have asked otherwise.
It was the “approximately” that made it sing.
It was a nice touch! … and saved me hundreds of hours of CPU time to figure it out myself … 😉
Wouldn’t 0°C be 32° F?
Dirk, we’re talking anomaly—— In other words how far it deviates from the mean…… so if it doesn’t deviate in F is doesn’t deviate in C.
ROFLMAO … Sorry Dirk, you just hit a funny bone with me on that one …
La Nina is still in progress in Niño 3.4 so temperatures are going to continue to go into negative anomaly for months.
http://weather.unisys.com/surface/sst_anom.gif
I am in agreement. I think your right. A quick play with the AMSU temperature toy gives me the feeling that we are still going negative.
Steve, I disagree. I went out to the AMSU temperature toy and using AQUA channel 5, we have been below the average almost the entire month (0.40c cooler than 4/23/2010). My prediction would be a -0.16c anomaly (+/- 0.02c). Every channel is showing an average of 0.40c cooler than last year, and approx. 0.15c cooler through almost the entire month thus far. I think the anomaly is going more negative than it is presently (-0.10c). Should be fun to see. 😉