The thought of having an open debate is causing quite an odor to emanate from the ranks of the faithful. Now they are accusing Scientific American of a wicked crime – giving other people a small opportunity to express themselves.
They liked it better when they didn’t have to be correct, honest, democratic, or answer any serious questions. Scaring children was always fun too.
Three hoorays for Joe Romm! Nobody is capable like him to make countless AGWers show their true colors!
Apparently we have the modern non skeptic scientist who never learned the ideals of the scientific method.But does know how to made up a dozen computer generated models and call them robust.
Joe (Who is incredibly,a member of my forum) Romm with a science degree (Diploma Mill?) Fail to see why it GOOD to be skeptical.That is why he is dumb as he shows with his continual gibberish babble.
He,just like Pachauri who babbles nonsense just as skillfully.Does us a favor in their self destruction.
Feeding our their own young now! hahahahahahaha But, but, what about consensus?!?!?!?!? Doesn’t that count?
This could get fun! I’ve already got the beer, popping popcorn……….
i have to agree with joe on this one
it was a really dumb poll.
but how about
KEEPING THE POLITICS OUT THE SCIENCE
oh, we’re not aloud to talk about that