They are back censoring all my comments again, after I posted a number of links to government data sources showing that almost everything the IPCC is claiming is incorrect.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- NASA Sea Level
- “getting smaller”
- “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
- Rapidly Accelerating Sea Level Rise
- Technology Advances
- “The Hour Of Decision”
- “fair & equitable”
- Michael Mann Continues His War
- Time Travelling Satellites
- Time Traveling Satellites
- Adult Content On X
- The Climate Of 1923
- Arctic Report Card
- Green Colorado
- Hottest Summer Ever
- “Sea ice could be gone by 2012, scientists warn”
- Record CO2 Growth
- Walz’s For Trump
- 6,000 Year Old Tree In The Austrian Alps
- Gemini Can See The Future
- Clinton To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Climate Intelligence Means “Making Things Up”
- Comedy From The BBC
- The Climate Afterlife
- Rewriting The Northern Hemisphere
Recent Comments
- Scott Allen on “getting smaller”
- Greg in NZ on NASA Sea Level
- arn on “getting smaller”
- Gordon Vigurs on “fair & equitable”
- Gordon Vigurs on Michael Mann Continues His War
- Gordon Vigurs on Michael Mann Continues His War
- Bob G on “getting smaller”
- arn on “getting smaller”
- Hank Phillips on “getting smaller”
- Francis Barnett on “Permanent Shift” In Antarctic Sea Ice
Can you link to an article? I’ll go ask where all of Steve Goddard’s facts went.
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2013/sep/27/ipcc-climate-change-report-ar5-live-coverage?commentpage=1
They are still censoring me too. I think I must have pointed out Dana’s statistical shenanigans one too many times.
I would try to help but The Graudian has me on moderation alert which I imagine is similar to Dean Wormer’s double secret probation.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y0cF2piwjYQ
It’s a big game Steve, Hide The Decline, Change the Data, Scare the Public and Steel their money.
You can ask a climate scientist questions on Sept 30 here. NASA posted the link on twitter.
https://plus.google.com/events/ci847lun7j8gqnfuv0unlra8504
Funny the name, created by NASA Goddard.
oops steal typo
They censor racist and homophobic comments. 😉
When it comes to working a comments thread, the other side works as a team. They know if one commenter posts twenty links then the bot is going to bin him. So twenty guys go in and each posts one link. The lone wolf ninja approach isn’t always the best way.
Just looked at that ‘sort-of’ article at the Guardian. I hadn’t realized that Al Gore runs the editing staff…
While reading it, I must admit I threw up in my mouth more than a little. Terrifying idiocy on full display.
I’ve emailed them Steve asking why your posts are disappearing at a rate faster than any supposed sea ice. These people , the left are disgusting , if the truth doesn’t fit them bury the truth.
Just heard Lord Chris Smith (hmmm wonder why he’s a lord) on radio 4 talking about all the wild weather we’ve been enduring. The man is a prat and a dozy thick prat at that.
I think it would make a nice 97% poll to find out how many climate skeptics are on pre-moderation at the Guardian.
Hmm. I also wonder how much alarmists charge to commission a typical 97% study? I wonder if it costs more if the data actually says 1.2%, or is it just a flat rate to bullshit? The marketing potential is endless. I wonder if the medical industry would be interested in a new, lower rate “volume pricing plan” like the Climate Industrial Complex seems to have adopted.
Man up. Stop whining. It’s the Guardian, for God’s sake. You should have expected this from your first comment on. Nothing in their behavior would suggest their championing of free speech.
Dana is deleting many of my comments too on this thread:
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2013/sep/27/global-warming-ipcc-report-humans?commentpage=1
97% $$$$$ is not negotiable Hockey Schtick. It is part of the contract.