Reader Arctic Forecast Missed By Only 100%

6 Responses to Reader Arctic Forecast Missed By Only 100%

1. omnologos says:

   October 12, 2013 at 12:52 pm

   in true IPCC form, all he has to do now is redefine the meaning of “million”

   Reply
2. kbray in california says:

   October 12, 2013 at 1:06 pm

   To be vulnerable to a broken heart, he must really love that ice.
   He will now be overjoyed with the growth.
   A heart is saved.

   Reply
3. Billy Liar says:

   October 12, 2013 at 4:18 pm

   Someone told me that Professor Peter Wadhams sometimes posts anonymously as ‘grant holt’. 🙂

   Reply
4. Robert Austin says:

   October 12, 2013 at 4:25 pm

   Grant Holt, I assume, is just a lay scientist as most of the denizens of the climate blogs.Thus, his Arctic ice projections, while perhaps amusingly wrong in hindsight, are understandable. It is the grossly aberrant Arctic ice forecasts of the massively funded and purportedly august institutions that really deserve our disgust.

   Reply
5. Robert Austin says:

   October 12, 2013 at 4:42 pm

   Billy Liar,
   If Grant Holt is actually a pseudonym of professor Peter Wadhams, then he is hereby demoted to the rank of “douche bag” for making irresponsible forecasts while under disguise as an amateur.

   Reply
6. BaruchSpinoza says:

   October 12, 2013 at 4:53 pm

   Wonder What his hurricane forecast was,

   Reply