Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on Worst March Drought On Record
- Robertvd on Worst March Drought On Record
- Bob G on Worst March Drought On Record
- GW on The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Don B on Worst March Drought On Record
- Ulric Lyons on Worst March Drought On Record
- conrad ziefle on The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- conrad ziefle on The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- D. Boss on The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Bob G on The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
Understanding The Difference Between Climate And Cherry Picking
A low ice day in March is climate, but a huge increase in September ice over the past five years is cherry-picking.
In 2012, experts told us that the winter maximum is meaningless, all that mattered was the summer minimum. (2012 had high winter maximum.) Now they say the exact opposite.
And a 40% increase in ice is near a record low, but a 3% Obama victory is a landslide.
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
What Progressives Want To Destroy
The City Of Boulder, Colorado wants to let CU Boulder destroy these wetlands, in order to keep them on board with the city’s renewable energy plan. Sacrificing the local environment, in order to pretend they are doing something about the global climate.
It takes decades of hard work to reach this level of left wing insanity. BTW – I took this photo on my iPhone.
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Crooked Little Girl
Katharine Hayhoe tries to pass herself off as a sweet, perky Christian girl. She is actually one of the most dishonest people I have ever had to deal with. Check out this paragraph from the Obama National Climate Assessment which she prepared.
Southwest | National Climate Assessment
She studied wildfires from 1916 to 2003, but only reported between 1970 and 2003. Why would she not report from 1916 to 1970? Well that’s easy. Because reporting the full data set would have completely destroyed her fake global warming thesis.
Indicator 3.16: Area and percent of forest affected by abiotic agents
High and Low Temperatures | Climate Change | US EPA
I sat with Hayhoe and Mann at Naomi Oreskes wildly fraudulent movie claiming climate skeptics were being funded by big tobacco and oil. These people are as intellectually corrupt and dishonest as anyone I have ever met.
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Reading Between The Lines
- We choose to live in a safe lilly-white neighborhood in Los Alamos, New Mexico.
- We support any form of perversion.
- Anyone who doesn’t play along with our global warming scam needs to shut up.
- We support murdering millions of innocent babies.
- See #1
- Our excuse for not taking care of the yard.
- We have no tolerance for Republicans and conservatives.
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Looking For Work
The company I have been working for as a contractor has run out of new development work for me, and has severely curtailed my hours. Other than (much appreciated) small donations on my blog, my climate research is self-funded and I need work to keep it going.
People who read my blog should be aware that I am an expert C++/Python/Qt/Graphics programmer, because I have distributed a large amount of free open-source climate analysis software (GHCN/Pulling Back The Curtain/Unhiding The Decline) – which has brought into focus the depth of government climate fraud.
You may not be aware that I was a top hardware person for many years at Motorola/IBM/Apple, ST Microelectronics, Hitachi and Intel. Here is an award I got from IBM/Motorola/Apple. My job there was to flush out every last design flaw, which is why I am such a bulldog about eliminating the completely worthless climate research being done by government agencies and academia.
The work they do at NASA/NOAA/Berkeley Earth/Penn State wouldn’t last five minutes in the engineering world. Their climate scientists are wildly incompetent and dishonest technical hacks.
Here is a plaque I got from Intel, where I was on the i7/Itanium design team for five years.
I was the design manager for the ST Microelectronics and Hitachi SH-5 microprocessor and one of the Cyrix Media-GX processors, which (20 years ago this month) brought computer prices down from $2,000 to below $1,000 permanently.
Over the past few years I have been more focused on software than hardware, and have done a number of software projects for the National Center for Atmospheric Research, including porting their weather models from UNIX to Windows.
I accelerated the processing of NCAR’s weather microphysics code by porting it to the GPU.
I also ported NCAR’s radiative transfer models to the GPU, producing 100X speedup. That work was terminated in 2009 when Kevin Trenberth realized he couldn’t account for the missing heat.
The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t.
My resume is huge, but a few other things I have done in recent years include writing image processing software used in military drones and software used by the feds for spying on cell phones. (The software Obama said doesn’t exist.)
I’m an expert OpenGL programmer, RF programmer, image processing programmer, and in fact there are very few computer related fields I haven’t mastered. Over the past ten years I have voluntarily chosen to trade off career in exchange for sorting out the climate scam. I am now blacklisted at many companies over my climate research, and have been fired several times over it. Even after getting stellar reviews for my work. This decision has cost me more than a million dollars in salary and lost opportunity costs. I don’t regret making it, and would make the same decision again. Integrity and faith are the most important things.
Someone at Google saw my resume online last year and bugged me for months to get started with their hiring process – because I had exactly the skills they were looking for in Boulder. After I gave her the thumbs up, a few hours later she got back to me and said “we aren’t looking for anyone with your skill set.” Someone in the process obviously recognized my name.
If you have any work you need done by a top programmer, please contact me at [email protected] If someone wanted to pay me to do climate research, that would be awesome too! I love doing both.
Much appreciated,
Tony
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment
Nick Stokes : Busted Part 3
This is part three of my Nick Stokes Busted series. Here are part 1 and part 2.
Nick Stoke’s final idiotic claim takes us right to the heart of this scam.
The first GISS plot is not the usual land/ocean data; it’s a little used Met Stations only
This was the GISS web page in 2005. Top plot was “Global Temperature (meteorological stations.) No ocean temperatures.
The 2001 GISS web page had the same thing.
And this is where the fraud begins. Gavin has a web page purporting to show the history of GISS land/ocean temperatures back to 1987. But if you look at the fine print at the bottom, NASA didn’t actually use ocean temperatures in 1987. Gavin’s graph is fake.
So what about 1997? If you hover over the 1997 label you can see that they only had ocean data back to 1950. So two thirds of the 1997 graph is fake.
Same thing with the 2000 graph. No pre-1950 data.
NASA didn’t start using pre-1950 ocean data until 2002. And there was good reason for it. The data doesn’t exist. It wasn’t until 15 years ago that they became dishonest enough to use completely fake data.
date: Wed Apr 15 14:29:03 2009
from: Phil Jones <[email protected]> subject: Re: Fwd: Re: contribution to RealClimate.org
to: Thomas Crowley <[email protected]>Tom,
The issue Ray alludes to is that in addition to the issue
of many more drifters providing measurements over the last
5-10 years, the measurements are coming in from places where
we didn’t have much ship data in the past. For much of the SH between 40 and 60S the normals are mostly made up as there is very little ship data there.Cheers
Phil
But as always, this story gets much worse. Not only don’t they have ocean data from the southern hemisphere, they also have very little land data.
Data from the Southern Hemisphere … are so meager that reliable conclusions are not possible.
TimesMachine: January 5, 1978 – NYTimes.com
The red dots below show the location of all NOAA GHCN stations with daily temperatures in the year 1900. NOAA and NASA have no clue what long term temperature trends are outside of the US, because they have almost no verifiable data.
ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/ghcn/daily/ghcnd-inventory.txt
Without the daily temperature data, any claims about historical temperatures are fake. Thermometers measure temperatures one instantaneous reading at a time. There is no such thing as a monthly or yearly thermometer.
And then, to top off their fraud, they massively tamper with the US data to make it match their fake global temperatures.
Make no mistake about it. Global warming is the worst junk science and biggest science scam in history. And Nick Stokes is one of their top propagandists.
Posted in Uncategorized
Leave a comment














































