Real Climate Science

Check out this world class nut case who said she wanted to interview me.

Me :

Hope,

I hope you can keep an open mind, be civil and learn from me. That is the key to being a successful adult.

When would you like to do the interview?

Can you keep an open mind that might admit science’s work on AGW is valid?

https://www.google.com/search?q=scientific+american+dark+money&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

http://www.aip.org/history/climate/index.htm

https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-chapter1.pdf

What’s your take on how all these scientists are faking a math based science .. yet are able to make the math add up across disciplines, contents and decades in the greatest cabal of gangster thug scientists ever known to science?

How do they make all that fake math add up?

(Please don’t refer to the fake climate gate scandal as your answer there .. try to be original and use cited argument, thanks)

I’m available any day this week except Monday. What time zone are you in? I’m in Cali.

I hear a ‘no’, as trained you will not be open to the idea that climate science is valid. Is that what I hear you saying, yes or no?

BUSH also fired climate scientists that did not toe HIS line:

http://www.ucsusa.org/our-work/center-science-and-democracy/promoting-scientific-integrity/manipulation-of-global.html

As was one of MY friends: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_7FK2q2eJ4

You would never weather an interview with me.  I will destroy your thin facade of intellectual acumen with ease and broadcast it – much like Merchant of Doubt does with Moreno – he will soon be exposed and relegated to the nearest street corner to scream his insanities..where he belongs.

Your polemics are weak – I can easily cite millions made by oil paid denier scientists. If you believe Big Oil is being bullied by the Big Green’s funding, you are about to get exposed as an oil paid talking points mindless parrot.

And I see you can not address the question about how they make all those math based lies add up. It’s an inane position and you know it.

I’d advise you to put on your seat belt. The industry funded climate change denial machine will humiliate the radical right conservative cause this year – and your cabal will be seen as the humanity destroying profit machine it is, lying ot the American people to defend the massive fossil fuel entrenched power.

http://priceofoil.org/campaigns/separate-oil-and-state/dirty-energy-money/

I’d advise you to run. You are simply giving me more and more material proving my point. Know this – I am here to expose your career as a misinformationist. I won’t be swayed and I will achieve my goal. My nation deserves to have a real conversation about energy. As long as industry trained talking points propagandists like yourself have a mike, that is impossible.

My response

I have no ties with any industry with any interest in climate. I do my own work. Your claims are scurrilous, unfounded and disgusting.

The question “climate science is valid yes/no?” indicates that you have no idea what science is about. Science consists of thousands of different ideas, not a statement of truth from the borg.

Is this climate science valid?

http://pqasb.pqarchiver.com/

I also receive no funding. Do you lie about people as a general practice?

I gave you the terms of the interview. Live, complete, unedited. No use of the media in any other form permitted. Do you agree to that, yes or no?

That’s the best you’ve got?

I’d need to go back over the convo to highlight every strawman and deflection you post. I’ll get to that later if I feel it’s worth my time.

So, you said you do interviews ‘all of the time’, but if anyone wants to watch, they have to tune into live stream? So you have like 0 – 12 viewers per interview? You don’t allow the entire uncut convo to be rebroadcast .. and people agree to this “all the time”? Do you wonder why I don’t buy that? I can’t find one link to a past live stream interview of you. What if someone watching the livecast records and edits it? Yet no one does? If you can’t produce evidence that you do interviews “all of the time”, I’ll go with you’re fibbing about that, too.

I have no doubt you would not agree to an interview with me even if I agree to only rebroadcast it uncut.

Please do re-read .. I don’t believe I’ve EVER claimed you are industry paid. You are industry trained .. you repeat industry’s propaganda talking points .. would you need me to list those for you?

My response

I have no industry training or ties. I ride my bicycle everywhere. I am a lifelong environmentalist. I fought for the Clean Air Act. I volunteered two summers as a wilderness ranger. I hate cars. You have no idea who I am.

Do you agree to my terms, or are you going to chicken out?

Wow.. fabulous material. Love the ad hom, the blind faith in you .. even when your claims are not backed up by your article .. if anyone looked closely .. but they don’t. I love how that one got 66 comments and how drawn they all are to personal attack. Will you post the first two that you omitted please? So funny – after you berate me for supposed out of context work.   I’m more than happy to do an interview live stream. Someone WILL record it and edit it, obviously .. you are well known name (politicians sadly quote you) – and you will have to admit you lied about doing past interviews “all of the time”.  I was hoping you would post the email chain, tho. Thanks.

My response

It is unacceptable that the interview is edited

BTW – “personal attack” seems to be your entire MO. You even brag about it.

In the mind of climate alarmists, the same weather as 1934 proves the climate is changing.

More Cold and Snow Thanks to Global Warming » CounterPunch: Tells the Facts, Names the Name

February 1934 was almost a carbon copy of February 2015

Current Climate Summary Maps – Powered by ACIS – High Plains Regional Climate Center

If you look very closely, you can see Penguins (or perhaps some other species of bird) marching across the ice.

I took my team of intrepid researchers out to explore Chesapeake Bay ice this afternoon, and my very worst fears were realized. It is all first year ice, and unlikely to survive through the summer.

The dire consequence of this is that Maryland Polar Bears will have to swim for miles to avoid having to pay tolls on the bridge.

Joe Biden says that failure to comply with the Obama CO2 religion is like “denying gravity” and wants skeptics silenced – like Freeman Dyson, the infinitely smart man.

The Civil Heretic

FOR MORE THAN HALF A CENTURY the eminent physicist Freeman Dyson has quietly resided in Prince­ton, N.J., on the wooded former farmland that is home to his employer, the Institute for Advanced Study, this country’s most rarefied community of scholars. Lately, however, since coming “out of the closet as far as global warming is concerned,” as Dyson sometimes puts it, there has been noise all around him. Chat rooms, Web threads, editors’ letter boxes and Dyson’s own e-mail queue resonate with a thermal current of invective in which Dyson has discovered himself variously described as “a pompous twit,” “a blowhard,” “a cesspool of misinformation,”

There is the suspicion that, at age 85, a great scientist of the 20th century is no longer just far out, he is far gone — out of his beautiful mind.  But in the considered opinion of the neurologist Oliver Sacks, Dyson’s friend and fellow English expatriate, this is far from the case. “His mind is still so open and flexible,” Sacks says. Which makes Dyson something far more formidable than just the latest peevish right-wing climate-change denier. Dyson is a scientist whose intelligence is revered by other scientists — William Press, former deputy director of the Los Alamos National Laboratory and now a professor of computer science at the University of Texas, calls him “infinitely smart.”

The Civil Heretic – Freeman Dyson – Profile – NYTimes.com

Joe Biden on the other hand, believes that non-president Roosevelt spoke to the US on non-existent televisions after the 1929 stock market crash.

[youtube=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Jf17Yo7hBM]

I know the skeptics under attack – Marc Morano, Joe Bast, Roy Spencer, Willie Soon, etc.

These are really good people trying to do the right thing. They are under attack by the very scum of the earth, exactly because they do the right thing.

History has repeated this story over and over again. Easily manipulated useful idiots always fall in line behind the scumbags, because scumbags are willing to lie over and over again, and useful idiots are too foolish to know the difference.

I’ve tried to get money from the Koch Brothers, with no luck. But who do they they give their money to? Alarmists Muller, Zeke and Mosher

By Richard Muller on December 17, 2003

Let me be clear. My own reading of the literature and study of paleoclimate suggests strongly that carbon dioxide from burning of fossil fuels will prove to be the greatest pollutant of human history. It is likely to have severe and detrimental effects on global climate. I would love to believe that the results of Mann et al. are correct, and that the last few years have been the warmest in a millennium.

Medieval Global Warming – Page 2 | MIT Technology Review

11/03/11

“It is ironic if some people treat me as a traitor, since I was never a skeptic”

Richard Muller, Climate Researcher, Navigates The Volatile Line Between Science And Skepticism

It is hilarious seeing Naomi Oreskes lie about big skeptic money. It doesn’t exist. Essentially all of the money is on the alarmist side.

Two years ago Google broke their news archive searches, because it was digging up too many inconvenient facts. Google has now decided to let anti-science criminal hacks like like Poltifact decide what is truth in science. They are not doing the right thing. They are behaving like Nazis. They have gotten away from their charter.

Skeptics reach millions of people and can take away hundreds of millions of dollars of Google business through a boycott.

Here are some alternatives:

Bing Blekko Boardreader CC Search

CrunchBase DuckDuckGo

Technorati Topsy WolframAlpha

Barack Hussein Obama blames The Crusades.

Forty-five years ago, we had dirty air and water in the US. LA looked like Beijing

The Cuyahoga River used to catch on fire.

I worked hard to get the Clean Air Act passed, and to establish and protect wilderness areas. I worked two summers as a volunteer ranger in the Cibola and Santa Fe National Forests. This was my home one summer at 12,000 feet elevation.

The US was very successful at cleaning up the environment. But then the environmental movement was hijacked by big money pushing the global warming scam. What would happen if fossil fuels were banned?

Every tree in the forest would be cut down for firewood. The air would be thick with smoke from burning wood. Every animal in the forest would be hunted to extinction for food. Whales would be hunted to extinction for oil. It would be an environmental apocalypse.

Low cost fossil fuels keep us clean, green, healthy and prosperous. Our clean environment is the result of our responsible use of fossil fuels. A clean environment is a luxury brought by wealth, which poor, low-CO2 emitting countries don’t enjoy.

Communist countries are filthy.

Greens are being used by the very rich pushing the climate scam

Al Gore

Continue reading →