Real Climate Science

Capracotta, Italy just received two metres of snow in one day.

Capracotta sommersa da oltre 2 metri di neve il 06 marzo 2015 – CMI

Fifteen years ago this month, climate experts announced the end of snow.

Global warming, the heating of the atmosphere by increased amounts of industrial gases, is now accepted as a reality by the international community.

Dr David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia,within a few years winter snowfall will become “a very rare and exciting event”.

“Children just aren’t going to know what snow is,” he said.

Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past – Environment – The Independent

I was having terrible problems with slowness loading thumbnails in Windows Explorer. It turns out that if you remove an image file from a directory, Windows is too dumb to update the thumbnails.db

You can have five image files in a directory which used to contain 500 image files, and Windows will attempt to update the thumbnails of the 495 missing image files, over and over again.

You can fix this by running Windows system software “Disk Cleanup” and cleaning up Thumbnails.

So far this year, the northeast US has been record cold, with by far the driest snow on record. The ratio of snow to precipitation has been double the long term average.

Experts say that Antarctic melt has doubled over the past five years.

Antarctic Ice Melt Rate Has Doubled Since 2010, Study Finds

The water must be hiding at the bottom of the sea, because sea level rise rates were faster prior to 2008

CU Sea Level Research Group | University of Colorado

One thing $29 billion peer-reviewed climate science never does is double check their propaganda. There is too much money at stake to tell the truth.

My brand new drive train broke when riding my bicycle over to Whole Foods this morning. So I am in the bike shop now with my new detachable touchpad. It takes about one minute to boot and get connected.

The President says he has the JV team on the run.

How many Whitetails in the picture? Click on it for a full sized image.

There was also a Cardinal, but it isn’t visible.

Continue reading →

The White House thoroughly investigated State Department communications over Benghazi, only they didn’t actually know where the Secretary of State’s E-mails were, and Obama now claims he never sent an E-mail in four years to the Secretary of State

Obama weighs in on Hillary Clinton’s private emails – CBS News

The President also said that there “wasn’t a smidgen of corruption at the IRS” after reviewing all 4,000 Lois Lerner E-mails which the White House said they couldn’t find.

How Many Birds Do Wind Turbines Really Kill? | Smart News | Smithsonian

President Obama is convinced that green energy is the future. He has already spent billions of dollars of your money on  failed green energy companies

Evergreen Solar ($25 million)*
SpectraWatt ($500,000)*
Solyndra ($535 million)*
Beacon Power ($43 million)*
Nevada Geothermal ($98.5 million)
SunPower ($1.2 billion)
First Solar ($1.46 billion)
Babcock and Brown ($178 million)
EnerDel’s subsidiary Ener1 ($118.5 million)*
Amonix ($5.9 million)
Fisker Automotive ($529 million)
Abound Solar ($400 million)*
A123 Systems ($279 million)*
Willard and Kelsey Solar Group ($700,981)*
Johnson Controls ($299 million)
Schneider Electric ($86 million)
Brightsource ($1.6 billion)
ECOtality ($126.2 million)
Raser Technologies ($33 million)*
Energy Conversion Devices ($13.3 million)*
Mountain Plaza, Inc. ($2 million)*
Olsen’s Crop Service and Olsen’s Mills Acquisition Company ($10 million)*
Range Fuels ($80 million)*
Thompson River Power ($6.5 million)*
Stirling Energy Systems ($7 million)*
Azure Dynamics ($5.4 million)*
GreenVolts ($500,000)
Vestas ($50 million)
LG Chem’s subsidiary Compact Power ($151 million)
Nordic Windpower ($16 million)*
Navistar ($39 million)
Satcon ($3 million)*
Konarka Technologies Inc. ($20 million)*
Mascoma Corp. ($100 million)

List: 36 Of Obama’s Taxpayer-Funded Green Energy Failures – Fox Nation

Now he blames climate skeptics for the technology failures he backed. This is spectacularly irrational, but there is a path forward for him.

Pick a heavily Democratic state like Rhode Island or Vermont, and turn it into a green energy demonstration. Run the entire state off green energy generated inside the state borders, and no one will be able to doubt the viability of the technology. Senators Sanders and Whitehouse would surely go along with this.

Are they serious about green energy, or are they just witch burners looking for someone to blame for their failures?