Real Climate Science

Obama is frustrated that the elected representatives of the people keep thwarting his plans to punish the bitter people who cling to guns and religion. He plans to use his overwhelming 40% approval rating as leverage to create further mayhem moving forward.

Twitter / SteveSGoddard: @rgnldprrn – are Arctic rowers …

I overlaid Dana’s completely fraudulent “Lindzen” projection (dark blue normalized to start date of 1988) on top of Hansen, GISS (light blue) and RSS (purple)

Even Dana’s completely bogus Lindzen projection beats Hansen by a wide margin. Yet The Guardian continues to lie to their readers about it.

BBC News – Q&A: Professor Phil Jones

SUV’s must have been a huge problem in 1860.

The defense for Hansen’s 1988 failed predictions seems to be “global warming is much less than forecast”

The same people also tell us that global warming is much worse than forecast.

A bunch of total nutcases.

The deluded minions of Hansen convince themselves that his forecasts were correct. Classic case of the Emperor’s New Clothes.

Methane is unstable and breaks down quickly in the atmosphere, and even if it doubled would have essentially no impact on the greenhouse effect. In the tropics, the effect would be an increase in downwelling longwave radiation of about 0.04%.

If everyone in Kansas City was an atmospheric molecule, only one of them would be methane. Anyone working on climate models and doesn’t know this, is driving under the influence of AGW stupidity.

Bill Illis posted a table from RealFakeClimate showing Hansen’s scenario A/B/C assumptions. What was inside was just about what I should have expected from Homer.

He is off by three orders of magnitude in his CFC numbers

www.realclimate.org/data/H88_scenarios.dat

The table is parts per million, but the CFC numbers are at least three orders of magnitude too high. CFC11 should be 0.00025 PPM, not 0.52

File:AYool CFC-11 history.png – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

If everyone on the planet was a molecule of air, less than two people would be CFC11 molecules. CFC’s play essentially no role in the greenhouse effect, as radiative transfer models show. A 1 ppm change in CO2 is 4,000 times more molecules than a doubling of CFC11.

Hansen is completely incompetent, and apparently has been for his entire career.