Bill Gray is Fort Collins’ senior skeptic. In 2006 he explained the biggest scam in scientific history.
06/05/2006
The only inconvenient truth about global warming, contends Colorado State University’s Bill Gray, is that a genuine debate has never actually taken place. Hundreds of scientists, many of them prominent in the field, agree.
“They’ve been brainwashing us for 20 years,” Gray says. “Starting with the nuclear winter and now with the global warming. This scare will also run its course. In 15-20 years, we’ll look back and see what a hoax this was.”
My belief is that three, four years from now, the globe will start to cool again, as it did from the middle ’40s to the middle ’70s.”
Chill out over global warming – The Denver Post
Kevin Trenberth is Boulder’s senior junk scientist, and wrote this in 2009 – right on schedule.
The fact is that we can’t account for the lack of warming at the moment and it is a travesty that we can’t.
Now Trenberth says it is due to the PMS state of the oceans
The oceans can at times soak up a lot of heat. Some goes into the deep oceans where it can stay for centuries. But heat absorbed closer to the surface can easily flow back into the air. That happened in 1998, which made it one of the hottest years on record. Trenberth says since then, the ocean has mostly been back in one of its soaking-up modes. “They probably can’t go on much for much longer than maybe 20 years, and what happens at the end of these hiatus periods, is suddenly there’s a big jump [in temperature] up to a whole new level and you never go back to that previous level again,” he says.
The ‘Consensus’ View: Kevin Trenberth’s Take On Climate Change
In other words, junk scientists in charge of the temperature data cool the past and warm the present, and then other junk scientists create junk theories based around their garbage data.
Trenberth’s “big jump in temperature” is due to data tampering, not global warming. The graph below shows recent GISS alterations to temperatures at the capital of Iceland.

In 1975, the National Academy of Sciences saw a completely different pattern – long periods of warming followed by long periods of equally large cooling.

National Academy Of Sciences 1975