USHCN 2.5 corrupts the US temperature record even more than the previous version. They have turned half a degree of measured cooling into a full degree of warming since 1920, and changed 2012 from third warmest to 1.5 degrees warmer than any other year.
The claimed warming trend in the US almost exactly matches the adjustments being made to the thermometer data.
The blue dots and red line show final USHCN2.5 temperatures (relative to 1895) – and the red dots and blue line show the adjustments that are being made. Note that the slopes are identical, which means that all claimed US warming is indeed Mann made, and Hansen made, and Karl made.
Back in Soviet Russia, we get rid of dissidents by telling big lie about them.
Richard Lindzen, is a notorious global warming denier who also denies that smoking causes cancer.
Richard Lindzen questioned a study about the effects of second hand smoke. He has failed to comply with the climate politburo party line, so we must make up lies about him.
Sunday, 2 May 2004
Antarctica is likely to be the world’s only habitable continent by the end of this century if global warming remains unchecked, the Government’s chief scientist, Professor Sir David King, said last week.
Weather Forecast – Antarctica, AA – Local & Long Range | Weather Underground
Libs believe that sacrificing the US can save the planet. Even if their brain damaged global warming religion had any scientific merit, their token gesture of committing suicide and genocide on the rest of US, would be of no benefit.
More than 1,000 coal-fired power plants are being planned worldwide, new research has revealed.
The huge planned expansion comes despite warnings from politicians, scientists and campaigners that the planet’s fast-rising carbon emissions must peak within a few years if runaway climate change is to be avoided and that fossil fuel assets risk becoming worthless if international action on global warming moves forward.
More than 1,000 new coal plants planned worldwide, figures show | Environment | The Guardian
Osama bin Laden couldn’t have hoped in his wildest dreams to do as much damage as James Hansen.
With temperatures averaging -47F this month and December 22, 2012 coming up in four weeks, the great meltdown and flood begins.
Why should Dems be concerned about incompetence, lies, fraud and blackmail in the Oval Office?
Until Friday, there were two possible explanations for why the White House failed to immediately call the Benghazi attack an act of terrorism. One was incompetence, the other was worse.
Now there is only one, and it is the worse one. Based on the persuasive testimony of ex-CIA boss David Petraeus, it is clear the Obama administration made a deliberate decision to mislead Congress and the American people.
So the president lied, including in a speech to the United Nations, where he cited the video as the reason for the attack. He sent out reams of flunkies to do the same, including his snide press secretary, Jay Carney.
Most notably, UN Ambassador Susan Rice went on five Sunday television shows to spin the nonsense about the hijacking of a demonstration — a demonstration that never existed. Rice made a fool of herself, and now, she, too is damaged goods.
Oddly, Petraeus, brought down by the reckless affair with his biographer, nonetheless looks like the only honest man in the drama.
A briefing he gave soon after the attack is now more suspect because it adhered to the party line, despite his belief that it was always a terrorist attack.
But Friday in his testimony behind closed doors, Petraeus told the truth as he knew it, even though the administration announced the day before that it was investigating his conduct at the CIA.
If that was meant to pressure him to protect the president, it failed spectacularly. Whatever his personal failings, Petraeus reinforced his reputation for professional integrity.
While Democrats are predictably and shamefully trying to deny the significance of Petraeus’ revelation, Republicans say they are determined to get the full truth, wherever the hunt takes them.
David Petraeus’ testimony pins mistruths to White House – NYPOST.com
Clinton to Visit Middle East in Move to Defuse Gaza Conflict
President Obama sent Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton to the Middle East on Tuesday to try to defuse the conflict in Gaza, the White House announced.
Clinton to Visit Israel in Effort to Defuse Gaza Conflict – NYTimes.com
The last time I saw a headline like that was in the year 2000, when Bill Clinton went to seal the final peace deal, and left with the Intifada raging and suicide bombers detonating on Jerusalem buses every other day.
The Washington Post says :
We’re on pace for 4°C of global warming. Here’s why that terrifies the World Bank.
Over the years at the U.N. climate talks, the goal has been to keep future global warming below 2°C. But as those talks have faltered, emissions have kept rising, and that 2°C goal is now looking increasingly out of reach. Lately, the conversation has shifted toward how to deal with 3°C of warming. Or 4°C. Or potentially more.
We’re on pace for 4°C of global warming. Here’s why that terrifies the World Bank.
No were not. There has been no warming for over 15 years. We aren’t on pace for anything. People can have whatever conversations they want, but that doesn’t mean they aren’t complete morons.
Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs
The hockey team just piles on one lie after another about temperature and sea level and hurricanes and tornadoes and snow and ice and everything else. We have entered a new dark age.
You could make a fortune preying on neurotic lefties – if you could stomach listening to them.
Ethical living: Can I fly with a clear conscience?
I’d like to travel by plane, but it seems iniquitous that air fares are so low. Can you offer me any reasons why I might fly with a clear conscience?
It is time for the aviation industry to pay the ferryman. Hitherto flying has soared above climate change regulation but from 30 April 2013 the EU dictates that it must sign up to emissions trading. In common with other heavily polluting industries, this means putting a cap on CO² emissions for planes arriving or departing from EU airports. Airlines would trade in pollution permits on an aviation carbon market. The theory is that fleets that are low carbon would be rewarded and this would incentivise airlines to invest in eco-friendly fleets.
Can I fly with a clear conscience? | Ethical living | Environment | The Observer
I presume that an eco-friendly fleet would recycle methane from the toilet straight into the engine. Another possibility is that every tenth flight would simply drop out of the sky. Or maybe they could burn corn instead of sending it to Africa for children to eat?
