In 1933, leftists believed that they could stop Nazi aggression by getting rid of their own guns. In case you doubted that lefties are both insane and terminally stupid.
19 Sep 1933 – FRANCE FEARS WAR NOT INCLINED TO DISARM Overshad…
In 1933, leftists believed that they could stop Nazi aggression by getting rid of their own guns. In case you doubted that lefties are both insane and terminally stupid.
19 Sep 1933 – FRANCE FEARS WAR NOT INCLINED TO DISARM Overshad…
Nazis and their modern day leftist clones are always looking for new ways to reduce undesirable populations, and keep them unarmed so that they can’t defend themselves.
It took as long to subdue the Warsaw Ghetto as it took to reduce the whole of France
Cairns Post Saturday 13 May 1944
People who believe that there are too many humans and that energy consumption is destroying the planet, have the opportunity to mitigate the problem by simply removing themselves from the planet.
But that isn’t what actually motivates them. Their real goal is to eliminate other people from the planet.
Scientific American agrees with Elizabeth Moon.
Apocalypse Soon: Has Civilization Passed the Environmental Point of No Return?: Scientific American
See the Elizabeth Moon article below this one.
This week science fiction writer Elizabeth Moon argues that everyone should be given a barcode at birth.
“If I were empress of the Universe I would insist on every individual having a unique ID permanently attached – a barcode if you will; an implanted chip to provide an easy, fast inexpensive way to identify individuals.
It would be imprinted on everyone at birth. Point the scanner at someone and there it is.
Having such a unique barcode would have many advantages. In war soldiers could easily differentiate legitimate targets in a population from non combatants.
This could prevent mistakes in identity, mistakes that result in the deaths of innocent bystanders. Weapons systems would record the code of the use, identifying how fired which shot and leading to more accountability in the field.
Anonymity would be impossible as would mistaken identity making it easier to place responsibility accurately, not only in war but also in non-combat situations far from the war.”
In other words, she is looking for a way to design weapons systems which can identify individual civilians. i.e a quick way to eliminate the tea party or other enemies of dear leader.
Elizabeth also likes to write about global warming
Global Warming & Human Survival
Discussions of global warming center on two basic issues: is the climate warming up, and what will that mean for the several billion humans on this planet? For those who agree that the climate is warming, the next questions are Why? And What can we do about it?
By all the good, solid, scientific evidence, the global mean temperature is in fact rising. Even staunch opponents of the global warming hypothesis are finally facing the facts and admitting that yes, the planet’s climate is warming up. Those who do not want to attempt any intervention to slow or stop the warming are now saying “Well, the planet used to be warmer…the global mean temperature throughout the planet’s history was higher…so higher is normal.”
Normal does not equal desirable. Or even survivable. “Normal warmness” did not sustain a human population over 2 billion.
Elizabeth stole this idea from the Nazis, though it should be noted that the Nazis only killed five million people, whereas she wants to eliminate five billion.
[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=twof7i0Od_E]
h/t to hauntingthelibrary
in 2001, Gleick told U.S. News & World Report, “The debate is over.”
This is how the global-warming community operates. Activists accuse skeptics of being anti-science and dishonest under the apparent belief that they are honest and analytical. They’re filled with their integrity until they get frustrated. They say that they only want to debate, except the debate is over. Then they wonder why skeptics don’t believe them.
Obama 2008 – talking about Americans he doesn’t like
they get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them or anti-immigrant sentiment or anti-trade sentiment
Democratic voters 2012
Two weeks after an imprisoned felon received 41 percent of the vote against President Obama in West Virginia’s presidential primary, Arkansas could provide another potential embarrassment for the incumbent.
Barack Obama’s Arkansas primary problem – The Washington Post
The West Virginia primary was interesting – 41% went to an imprisoned criminal, and the rest went to a guy who has stolen $8 trillion from our children’s future.
Gleick rejected an invitation by Heartland to debate, right before he committed his felonies against Heartland. After he was caught, he said he did it because he “just wanted an honest debate.”
We have reached a point
in Germanyon Earth where a particular group of well fundedfinanciersbig oilJewsclimate deniers threatens our very existence. Desperate times call for desperate measures, so it is now our official viewpoint that crimes againstJewsclimate deniers is acceptable in defense of theFatherlandMother Earth.If you believe something strongly enough, it is OK to dehumanize people who disagree with you – and commit crimes against them. The end always justifies the means.
Gleick and Goldenberg are both Jewish surnames. Perhaps they can understand Psalms Chapter 37.