The “world’s top rated climatologist” – James Hansen warns that continued use of coal will completely eliminate the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets. Be afraid – be very afraid …..
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The World’s Worst Scientists
- “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- A Real Hockey Stick
- A Real Hockey Stick
- Doubling Energy Costs
- Doubling Energy Costs
- “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
- Australia Permanent Drought Update
- Let Them Burn Wood
- “New computer modeling”
- Climate Destroying Shrimp
- What’s At Stake?
- Too Hot To Live
- What’s At Stake?
- “The world began to end on 12th May 2024”
- “Climate change is a myth”
- Racist Gas
- RFK Jr. Discusses The Green New Deal And Climate
- “world is on edge of climate abyss, UN warns”
- Ivy Echo Chamber
- Climate Homicide
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Homophobic Gas
- World Bank Expectations
- Trained Not To Learn
Recent Comments
- Conrad Ziefle on The World’s Worst Scientists
- arn on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Francis Barnett on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- arn on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- Steve Cooksey on “Trees are feasting on decades of carbon dioxide emissions”
- spren on “You Can’t Hide Your Lying Eyes”
- Jack the Insider on Doubling Energy Costs
- Conrad Ziefle on Doubling Energy Costs
- Disillusioned on Doubling Energy Costs
- Francis Barnett on Doubling Energy Costs
James Hansen stated in the past that soot was at least just as responsible as co2. In recent years he has forgotten his peer reviewed papers and is now acting on behalf of his embarassed grandchildren. Stop the continued arrests! Stop the climate Rapture! Decease from your Pinatubo nonsense!
What else can you expect from someone who was so hung up on Venus?
“Temperature and CO2 feedback ‘weaker than thought'”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8483722.stm
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v463/n7280/full/nature08769.html
Did Steig’s paper ultimately eek out .0000012 C temp rise or something like that? And it was primarily the peninsula?
So, in a couple hundred thousand years it could…. oh wait.
lol, something like that, Steig’s paper did show mostly peninsula warming, but that’s what one would expect, knowing that’s where most human activity is occurring. Oddly, O’Donnell’s showed more subtle but more dispersed warming. That said, even the authors note that the temp record is so poor its impossible to tell whether its warming or not.(Two very incomplete data sets for the interior antarctic.) I believe the whole impetus of the O’Donnell paper was an attempt to bring statistical reality to climate studies. I’m not optimistic they were successful in that endeavor.
Its a funny story, Steig was fairly smug in that the results of both papers could be construed as similar, but as one of the authors noted(I don’t remember which one) , if the results did reflect reality it would be by mere chance that Steig’s results got there.
The mainstream media talks about Greenland/Artarctic melt as if it is really happening. No sense letting the facts get in the way of a good story.