The “world’s top rated climatologist” – James Hansen warns that continued use of coal will completely eliminate the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets. Be afraid – be very afraid …..
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Gordon Vigurs on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Jack the Insider on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!




James Hansen stated in the past that soot was at least just as responsible as co2. In recent years he has forgotten his peer reviewed papers and is now acting on behalf of his embarassed grandchildren. Stop the continued arrests! Stop the climate Rapture! Decease from your Pinatubo nonsense!
What else can you expect from someone who was so hung up on Venus?
“Temperature and CO2 feedback ‘weaker than thought'”
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8483722.stm
http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v463/n7280/full/nature08769.html
Did Steig’s paper ultimately eek out .0000012 C temp rise or something like that? And it was primarily the peninsula?
So, in a couple hundred thousand years it could…. oh wait.
lol, something like that, Steig’s paper did show mostly peninsula warming, but that’s what one would expect, knowing that’s where most human activity is occurring. Oddly, O’Donnell’s showed more subtle but more dispersed warming. That said, even the authors note that the temp record is so poor its impossible to tell whether its warming or not.(Two very incomplete data sets for the interior antarctic.) I believe the whole impetus of the O’Donnell paper was an attempt to bring statistical reality to climate studies. I’m not optimistic they were successful in that endeavor.
Its a funny story, Steig was fairly smug in that the results of both papers could be construed as similar, but as one of the authors noted(I don’t remember which one) , if the results did reflect reality it would be by mere chance that Steig’s results got there.
The mainstream media talks about Greenland/Artarctic melt as if it is really happening. No sense letting the facts get in the way of a good story.