NOAA and NASA keep adjusting the temperature trend upwards. Then Mann compares the corrupted temperature data with tree rings, and says they don’t match.
Mann responds by throwing out the tree-ring data, and uses the corrupted NASA data instead.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Game Over For The Climate
- Another Ice Age?
- Historic Heatwave
- Historic Heatwave
- Science-Free Journalism
- Why Is Venus So Hot?
- Color Or Monochrome?
- AI Doublespeak
- AI Doublespeak
- Net Zero Intelligence
- “The Green Party dropped nearly 9 per cent”
- Fake Record Heat In India
- RFK Jr’s Plan For $12 Gas
- Hockey Match
- Hockey Match
- Giving Proper Credit
- Conspiracy Theory!
- “No One Is Above The Law”
- CNN Experts Discuss Medicine
- Looking For Their Lost Keys
- Rapid Climate Change
- CBS News 1982 : One Fourth Of Florida To Drown
- Affordable Transportation
- “Why Scientific Fraud Is Suddenly Everywhere”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Jack the Insider on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Disillusioned on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Conrad Ziefle on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- arn on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Disillusioned on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Bill on Historic Heatwave
- Disillusioned on Maldives Refuse To Drown
- Bill on Another Ice Age?
- Bob G on Maldives Refuse To Drown
Thank you, Steven, for having the courage to speak out about fraudulent post-WWII science..
To date, no scientist from NASA, NOAA, the National Academy of Sciences, or the Royal Society has had the courage to publicly:
1. Address clear and unequivocal experimental evidence in Figures 1-3 of the Sun’s pulsar core.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Chapter_2.pdf
2. Answer questions about two abrupt changes in consensus science in 1945-46.
_ a.) The internal composition of the Sun was changed from mostly iron (Fe) in 1945 to mostly hydrogen (H) in 1946, without discussion or debate. WHY?
_ b.) Textbooks replaced Nobel Laureate Francis W. Aston’s rigorously valid “nuclear packing fraction” with von Weizsacker’s convincing but deceptive “nuclear binding energy” after the Second World War, again without discussion or debate. WHY?
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/WHY.pdf
Reblogged this on Gds44's Blog.
NASA cutting space exploration and leaving the climate fraud budget intact.
And the MSM doesn’t even raise an eyebrow? Evangelicals control just about every institution even if the emperor has no clothes.
http://www.hngn.com/articles/20726/20131230/nasa-budget-cut-may-shutdown-cassini-and-mars-curiosity.htm
More fraudulent spending of taxpayer funds on crap research.
The new Australian environment minister should sack the department staff responsible for this. Next thing they’ll be studying how Mardi Gras benefits gay penguins.
http://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2013-12-30/scientists-to-create-future-climate-conditions-under-antarctic-/5178362
And another load of alarmist crap.
Especially when there has been no sea level change in California.
http://www.ibtimes.com/california-king-tides-hit-are-rising-sea-levels-sign-climate-change-1522948