JAXA recently changed their Arctic sea ice algorithm, to move 2013 (red) from above the 2000’s mean, to below it.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Mike Peinsipp on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Robertvd on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- conrad ziefle on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Bob G on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- arn on Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
Is there not some sort of legal procedure to have thes people verify their claims??
Regulations are for little people, not governments. Especially in this post-Constitutional era.
Is this done without so much as an announcement explaining yet another adjustment?
You could never understand the complexities of the adjustments made by NOAA scientists. Niether you nor I can think at such a complex level. It is WAY beyond us!
(sarc)
I have some snake oil for sale….
It is freezing in Arizona! Not enough climate change for your liking.
Publications that use such non-peer reviewed data set update adjustments thus suffer from serious lack of scientific rigor.
Keep shining that light Steve. You’re on the right side of the ‘debate’.
Didn’t they just do it, and are now doing it a again?