JAXA recently changed their Arctic sea ice algorithm, to move 2013 (red) from above the 2000’s mean, to below it.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
- “He Who Must Not Be Named”
Recent Comments
- mwhite on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- Bob G on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- William on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- gordon vigurs on “Siberia might stay livable”
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- conrad ziefle on “Siberia might stay livable”
- Timo, not that one! on “Siberia might stay livable”
Is there not some sort of legal procedure to have thes people verify their claims??
Regulations are for little people, not governments. Especially in this post-Constitutional era.
Is this done without so much as an announcement explaining yet another adjustment?
You could never understand the complexities of the adjustments made by NOAA scientists. Niether you nor I can think at such a complex level. It is WAY beyond us!
(sarc)
I have some snake oil for sale….
It is freezing in Arizona! Not enough climate change for your liking.
Publications that use such non-peer reviewed data set update adjustments thus suffer from serious lack of scientific rigor.
Keep shining that light Steve. You’re on the right side of the ‘debate’.
Didn’t they just do it, and are now doing it a again?