JAXA recently changed their Arctic sea ice algorithm, to move 2013 (red) from above the 2000’s mean, to below it.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Warming Twice As Fast
- Understanding Climate Science
- Recycling The Same News Every Century
- Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Global Warming Emergency In The UK
- Mainstream Media Analysis Of DOGE
- Angry And Protesting
- Bad Weather Caused By Racism
- “what the science shows”
- Causes Of Earthquakes
- Precision Taxation
- On the Cover Of The Rolling Stone
- Demise Of The Great Barrier Reef
- Net Zero In China
- Make America Healthy Again
- Nobel Prophecy Update
- Grok Defending Climategate
- It Is Big Oil’s Fault
- Creative Marketing
- No Emergency Or Injunction
- The Perfect Car
- “usually the case”
- Same Old Democrats
- Record Arctic Ice Growth
Recent Comments
- Independent on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- conrad ziefle on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- Bob G on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- arn on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- william on Arctic Sea Ice Declining Faster Than Expected
- conrad ziefle on Recycling The Same News Every Century
- conrad ziefle on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- william on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- gordon vigurs on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
- Tel on Will Their Masks Protect Them From CO2?
Is there not some sort of legal procedure to have thes people verify their claims??
Regulations are for little people, not governments. Especially in this post-Constitutional era.
Is this done without so much as an announcement explaining yet another adjustment?
You could never understand the complexities of the adjustments made by NOAA scientists. Niether you nor I can think at such a complex level. It is WAY beyond us!
(sarc)
I have some snake oil for sale….
It is freezing in Arizona! Not enough climate change for your liking.
Publications that use such non-peer reviewed data set update adjustments thus suffer from serious lack of scientific rigor.
Keep shining that light Steve. You’re on the right side of the ‘debate’.
Didn’t they just do it, and are now doing it a again?