Through July 27, NOAA US HCN stations have reported the fewest number of 100 degree readings, since at least 1910. In 1936, almost 10 times as many 100 degree readings were reported.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
- 45 Years Ago Today
- Solution To Denver Homelessness
- Crime In Colorado
- Everything Looks Like A Nail
- The End Of NetZero
- UK Officially Sucks
- Crime In Washington DC
- Apparently People Like Warm Weather
- 100% Wind By 2030
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Francis Barnett on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- dearieme on “even within the lifetime of our children”
- John Francis on The Anti-Greta
- John Francis on The Anti-Greta
- conrad ziefle on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- Luigi on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
- arn on 60 Years Of Progress in London
Steven, you are confusing the public by showing measurements.
The measurements can’t be right if they don’t agree with the computer projections from expensive computers following programs designed by high-ranking scientists like Hanson.
Wow! A first. An “omanuel” comment that is actually relevant to the post …
Truly; mark this day.
We had one day this year. None last year.
Still has no meaning for global averages.
Bugger off.
Ah, so it is “global averages” are the important climate metric this month?
I just love how the key data points, measurement methods, raw data “adjustments” and models just keep changing on a month-by-month basis to keep the CAGW scam alive.
For a “settled science” the only thing that appears to be settled is the absolute, unquestioning belief in the validity of those computer-generated fantasy climate models predicting imminent doom for the planet for the last 20 years.
“For a “settled science” the only thing that appears to be settled is the absolute, unquestioning belief in the validity of those computer-generated fantasy climate models predicting imminent doom for the planet for the last 20 years.”
Well said.
+1
But you spelled psychience wrong.
From WIKI:
Psyche (Psyché in French) is the Greek term for “soul It may also refer to:
1 Mythology….