Through July 27, NOAA US HCN stations have reported the fewest number of 100 degree readings, since at least 1910. In 1936, almost 10 times as many 100 degree readings were reported.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Gordon Vigurs on Is Antarctica Melting?
- Bob G on Is Antarctica Melting?
- conrad ziefle on High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Gordon Vigurs on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on 65 Years Of Progress!
- Bob G on 65 Years Of Progress!
Steven, you are confusing the public by showing measurements.
The measurements can’t be right if they don’t agree with the computer projections from expensive computers following programs designed by high-ranking scientists like Hanson.
Wow! A first. An “omanuel” comment that is actually relevant to the post …
Truly; mark this day.
We had one day this year. None last year.
Still has no meaning for global averages.
Bugger off.
Ah, so it is “global averages” are the important climate metric this month?
I just love how the key data points, measurement methods, raw data “adjustments” and models just keep changing on a month-by-month basis to keep the CAGW scam alive.
For a “settled science” the only thing that appears to be settled is the absolute, unquestioning belief in the validity of those computer-generated fantasy climate models predicting imminent doom for the planet for the last 20 years.
“For a “settled science” the only thing that appears to be settled is the absolute, unquestioning belief in the validity of those computer-generated fantasy climate models predicting imminent doom for the planet for the last 20 years.”
Well said.
+1
But you spelled psychience wrong.
From WIKI:
Psyche (Psyché in French) is the Greek term for “soul It may also refer to:
1 Mythology….