Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
Recent Comments
- Terry Shipman on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Bob G on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- JohnFrancis on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Louis Hooffstetter on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Billyjack on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- arn on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Robertvd on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Bob G on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Bob G on Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Bob G on Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
GIStemp – who needs Antarctic data or temps near ice.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
E.M. has been swamped with his job of late, but he has at least been keeping up with the latest news. This is more confirmation of the work you and Paul Homewood have been doing.
The reason for not collecting or using data from near ice is due to the polar bears and penguins attacking everyone so we have to declare war on them.
You see, if they imagine their icy realms are melting, they will retreat or surrender. 🙂
At least you’re trying to find a “good reason”, they don’t even care to pretend that they’re *not* lying anymore.
Possibly/hopefully a sign of their “demise” – scientifically speaking! 🙂
“Why should I show you my code when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?”
was that Phil that said that? I remember it.
We already knew that GIStemp was wrong, now we know why.
Another great find by the Chiefio! 🙂
Tony what, no hat trick? Anyway if specific regions, like the 70 to 90 south lat, were compared to the satellites in the same area, we may find out where specifically the divergence is developing??
So that’s how professionals hide the decline is it?
Well, well.