Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
Recent Comments
- arn on Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- dm on Extreme Weather
- Mike on 70C At Lisbon
- Mike on Extreme Weather
- conrad ziefle on Extreme Weather
- Luigi on 70C At Lisbon
- Luigi on 70C At Lisbon
- Bob G on Extreme Weather
- arn on 70C At Lisbon
- Gordon Vigurs on Extreme Weather
GIStemp – who needs Antarctic data or temps near ice.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
E.M. has been swamped with his job of late, but he has at least been keeping up with the latest news. This is more confirmation of the work you and Paul Homewood have been doing.
The reason for not collecting or using data from near ice is due to the polar bears and penguins attacking everyone so we have to declare war on them.
You see, if they imagine their icy realms are melting, they will retreat or surrender. 🙂
At least you’re trying to find a “good reason”, they don’t even care to pretend that they’re *not* lying anymore.
Possibly/hopefully a sign of their “demise” – scientifically speaking! 🙂
“Why should I show you my code when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?”
was that Phil that said that? I remember it.
We already knew that GIStemp was wrong, now we know why.
Another great find by the Chiefio! 🙂
Tony what, no hat trick? Anyway if specific regions, like the 70 to 90 south lat, were compared to the satellites in the same area, we may find out where specifically the divergence is developing??
So that’s how professionals hide the decline is it?
Well, well.