Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- william on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Robertvd on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- czechlist on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
GIStemp – who needs Antarctic data or temps near ice.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
E.M. has been swamped with his job of late, but he has at least been keeping up with the latest news. This is more confirmation of the work you and Paul Homewood have been doing.
The reason for not collecting or using data from near ice is due to the polar bears and penguins attacking everyone so we have to declare war on them.
You see, if they imagine their icy realms are melting, they will retreat or surrender. 🙂
At least you’re trying to find a “good reason”, they don’t even care to pretend that they’re *not* lying anymore.
Possibly/hopefully a sign of their “demise” – scientifically speaking! 🙂
“Why should I show you my code when all you want to do is find something wrong with it?”
was that Phil that said that? I remember it.
We already knew that GIStemp was wrong, now we know why.
Another great find by the Chiefio! 🙂
Tony what, no hat trick? Anyway if specific regions, like the 70 to 90 south lat, were compared to the satellites in the same area, we may find out where specifically the divergence is developing??
So that’s how professionals hide the decline is it?
Well, well.