In 2001, the UN IPCC said “Mild winter temperatures will decrease heavy snowstorms”
Since they made that forecast, UN headquarters has seen five of its ten largest snowstorms.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ivy Echo Chamber
- Climate Homicide
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Homophobic Gas
- World Bank Expectations
- Trained Not To Learn
- Protecting Endangered Species
- Record Climate Cynicism
- Record Cynicism
- The Latest In Climate Science Rhetoric
- Climate Desperation
- Artificial Stupidity
- Climate Obsession
- The Climate Empire Strikes Back
- Climate Scam Parrots
- “I’ve dealt with him before ”
- “I’ve dealt with him before.”
- “BE HONEST”
- Turn Out The Lights – The Party’s Over
- Net Zero In The UK
- Turn Out The Lights, The Party Is Over
- Michael Mann Again
- Over The Target
- Michael Mann’s Latest Research
- “an amazing documentary dismantling the climate change theory”
Recent Comments
- Dan A Sinema on Homophobic Gas
- Conrad Ziefle on Ivy Echo Chamber
- feathers on Ivy Echo Chamber
- Bert on Ivy Echo Chamber
- Conrad Ziefle on Climate Homicide
- Conrad Ziefle on Climate Homicide
- Russell Cook on Climate Homicide
- czechlist on Ivy Echo Chamber
- Russell Cook on Climate Homicide
- Dan A Sinema on Climate Homicide
Standing in the ruins of Hiroshima in AUG 1945 [1], Paul Kazuo Kuroda realized that “. . . the beginning of the world may have been just like this.”
The UN was formed in OCT 1945 and world leaders began using federal research grants to guide science away from Kuroda’s finding, toward goals in UN’s Agenda 21 [2].
That is how Kuroda’s finding in AUG 1945 became “the greatest secret of the universe” in 2009.
The UN’s primary goal may have been to avoid the possibility of worldwide nuclear annihilation – mentioned in the last paragraph of Aston’s 1922 Nobel Lecture [3] – by forbidding public knowledge of the source of energy that destroyed Hiroshima.
This practice violated basic principles of science but remained practically invisible to the public until the UN’s Agenda 21 [2] was finally published in 1972.
Climategate emails in late Nov 2009 showed how the UN’s IPCC used UN’s Agenda 21 to guide global temperature data.
Princeton Professor Will Happer explains in this video [5] how the myth of carbon pollution is used by the UN today to hide Kuroda’s 1945 discovery.
References:
1. P. K. Kuroda, The Origin of the Chemical Elements and the Oklo Phenomenon (Springer Publishing, 1982) 165 pp. The quote is from p. 2 http://www.amazon.com/Origin-Chemical-Elements-Oklo-Phenomenon/dp/3642686699 or http://www.springer.com/chemistry/physical+chemistry/book/978-3-642-68669-6
2. “United Nations Agenda 21” (1972) http://habitat.igc.org/agenda21/index.htm
3. Aston’s PROMISE & WARNING (Dec 1922); CHAOS & FEAR (Aug -Sept 1945)
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/CHAOS_and_FEAR_August_1945.pdf
4. “Solar energy,” Advances in Astronomy (submitted for on-line review, 6 JAN 2015):
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Solar_Energy_For_Review.pdf
5. Will Happer, “The Myth of Carbon Pollution” (2014 Video)
http://marshall.org/events/the-myth-of-carbon-pollution/
I.e., misinformation from the UN’s IPCC is not caused by incompetence but by design to advance UN Agenda 21:
http://habitat.igc.org/agenda21/index.htm
Tonight I am pleased to conclude that Occam’s razor shaved Big Brother!
Big Brother’s beard had been growing for seventy years and “National” Academies of the Sciences had agreed on names for each whisker: Consensus Model of Global Climate; Big Bang Cosmology; Standard Solar Model; Standard Nuclear Model, etc., etc.!
Here’s how whiskers sprouted from Big Brother ‘s chin:
In 1946, the UK’s Royal Society first published changes in the foundations of astronomy, astrophysics, climatology, cosmology, etc., by changing the internal composition of the ordinary Sun-like stars from:
a.) Mostly iron (Fe) in 1945, to
b.) Mostly hydrogen (H) in 1946
Supposedly independent “National” Academies of the Sciences worldwide all agreed to this absurd change, without any discussion or debate.
It took several decades for me to recognize that all of these Standard, Consensus Models grew from the chin of the same Big Brother, into a growth well-suited for Occam’s razor
Interesting that there is no big storms during the late 1960s to early 1970s when the crops were failing and the world was worried about a coming Ice Age.
The 1974 CIA report: “A Study of Climatological Research as it Pertains to Intelligence Problems”
I was going to comment that the pattern certainly appears to follow pre adjustment temperatures very closely but I am not one to confuse correlation with causation like those “experts.”
Soon to be 6.
Reblogged this on Centinel2012 and commented:
The question should be have they gotten anything right … lol
Doesn’t the UKMO Betts contribute significantly to this group?
The standard excuse is that “science has progressed further since then”. I doubt their understanding of climate has progressed enough in 14 years to make such a statement, and I wouldn’t be surprised if they were making claims of decreased snowstorms as little as 5 or 6 years ago.
Funny how when things don’t go as predicted, science suddenly “progresses”.
Science is settled for 100 years, but not for 15 years.
Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings.
Reblogged this on the WeatherAction News Blog.