All The Lies That Are Unfit To Print

12 Responses to All The Lies That Are Unfit To Print

1. emsnews says:

   February 2, 2015 at 1:05 pm

   The poll wasn’t taken in upstate NY, that is certain. It rarely is above 10 degrees F at night this winter, often below 0. Coldest winter in the last 40 years for me. Yet another blizzard today, -17º F at night this week!

   Reply
2. Colorado Wellington says:

   February 2, 2015 at 1:54 pm

   We should also try to ask:

   As you may have heard, attacks on American ideals and liberties are thought to be the work of hostile infiltrators in U.S. businesses. Should the federal government limit the amount of hostile anti-American propaganda that U.S. businesses put out?

   Stupid questions invite stupid responses.

   Reply
   • Colorado Wellington says:

     February 2, 2015 at 2:03 pm

     Even though the first part is not so far off …

     Reply
3. omanuel says:

   February 2, 2015 at 3:54 pm

   Our 2001 papers on the Sun were

   A.. Excluded from Proceedings of the

   1. Conference on Asteroids at Palermo, Italy (Sicily) where Galileo had taught.

   http://www.astropa.unipa.it/Asteroids2001/index1.html

   2. SOHO-ACE Workshop 2001 on Solar and Galactic Composition, in Bern, Switzerland

   http://www.worldcat.org/title/solar-and-galactic-composition-a-joint-sohoace-workshop-bern-switzerland-6-9-march-2001/oclc/49519037

   (The editor, Robert F. Wimmer-Schweingruber, inserted a section in the Proceedings claiming that an iron-rich solar interior was impossible, but I was not allowed to publish the experimental data showing the Sun and other ordinary stars generate and discard hydrogen to interstellar space instead of interstellar clouds of hydrogen forming stars that act as H-fusion reactors).

   B. Included

   1. As Abstract 56.09 in the 197th Meeting of the American Astronomical Society, San Diego, CA January 7-11, 2001.

   2. As Expanded Abstract 1041in Proceedings of the 32nd Lunar and Planetary Science Conference, March 12-16, 2001, http://www.omatumr.com/lpsc.prn.pdf

   Reply
4. John B., M.D. says:

   February 2, 2015 at 4:17 pm

   All the poll proves is the alarmists are winning the messaging battle – with lies told by a media with an agenda.

   Reply
   • Gail Combs says:

     February 2, 2015 at 6:49 pm

     All it proves is you can LIE with statistics. That poll is useless. Remember NYT readers are low information Progressives.

     Try Breitbart or the New York Post readers and you get an entirely different view.

     From the latest Rasmussen Poll
     Global Warming is Primarily Caused By…

     Human activity Planetary Trends Other Reason
     December 2014
     42% ……………….. 42% ……………………. 7%
     October 2014
     47% ………………. 37% ……………………. 6%
     http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/environment_energy/environment_update

     NY Post: http://nypost.com/tag/global-warming/

     Steve Goddard even made it on NY Post!
     Global-warming skeptic says government manipulated temperature data

     Another decent article The Lessons of Climate Change Past

     ….And if climate Cassandras are as conscientious as they claim to be about weighing evidence, how do they accommodate historical evidence of enormously consequential episodes of climate change not produced by human activity?

     Before wagering vast wealth and curtailments of liberty on correcting the climate, two recent books should be considered.

     In “The Third Horseman: Climate Change and the Great Famine of the 14th Century,” William Rosen explains how Europe’s “most widespread and destructive famine” was the result of “an almost incomprehensibly complicated mixture of climate, commerce and conflict, four centuries in gestation.”….

     In “Global Crisis: War, Climate Change & Catastrophe in the Seventeenth Century,” Geoffrey Parker, a history professor at Ohio State, explains how a “fatal synergy” between climatological and political factors produced turmoil from Europe to China…

     Whatever caused the LIA — decreased sunspot activity and increased seismic activity were important factors — it caused, among other horrific things, “stunting” that, Parker says, “reduced the average height of those born in 1675, the ‘year without a summer,’ or during the years of cold and famine in the early 1690s, to only 63 inches: the lowest ever recorded.”…

     Neither book, however, supports those who believe human behavior is the sovereign or even primary disrupter of climate normality, whatever that might be.

     With the hands that today’s climate Cassandras are not using to pat themselves on the back for their virtuous empiricism, they should pick up such books.

     Reply
     • inMAGICn says:

       February 3, 2015 at 12:48 am

       Just look at how the question is framed. It is a standard SciFi theme: “If this continues…”
       Fiction follows.

       Reply
5. gator69 says:

   February 2, 2015 at 5:38 pm

   This must be the sample used by the NYT.

   http://www.video.theblaze.com/video/v36923985/stu-asks-strangers-what-they-know-on-global-warming

   Reply
6. John Silver says:

   February 2, 2015 at 6:18 pm

   Der Völkischer Times.

   Reply
7. sabretoothed says:

   February 3, 2015 at 3:16 am

   http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=987_1422892881 UK Global Warming

   Reply
8. rah says:

   February 4, 2015 at 2:28 am

   The weather in the NYC area looked on heck of a lot worse than that to me when I drove by just north of the city (I-95 S to I-287) Monday afternoon this week. I wouldn’t use the NYT, LAT, or Boston Globe for bird cage liners for a bird I liked. They are fine for a poop pad or fire starter though.

   Reply
9. Beale says:

   February 4, 2015 at 7:55 am

   What’s with South Dakota? Doesn’t it have “climate deniers”?

   Reply