———————- Begin list —————————-
———————- End list ——————————
The only compensation I receive for my climate work is donations from generous individual readers, which work out to about $1-$2 per hour for the time I have put in over the past decade.
People who claim I am funded are lying, just like they do about climate. I am a lifelong environmentalist, and I am blowing the whistle on the criminals who have hijacked the environmental movement with this global warming scam.
I assume this was in response to my post on another thread wherein I mentioned that you may have been libeled. I recall you stating in the past that you get no corporate money, which is why I believe that you were libeled by that idiot.
This is really a shame… Progressive Politics and Climate Change are well funded via our Tax Dollars in the form of Grants. EPA writes checks for Billions in Grants…
Yet if a Skeptic receives any kind of support or funding their motives are questioned… Disregarded…. Total hypocrisy and a double standard…
I like your response much better that the UAH group.
Neither Christy nor Spencer receives any research support or funding from oil, coal or industrial companies or organizations, or from any private or special interest groups. All of their climate research funding comes from federal and state grants or contracts.
So they are trying to tell us the federal and state governments are not the biggest ‘Special Interest Groups’ there are?
Come on Tony, I’ve seen you car down at the Whole Foods store. Fess up!
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_6s6CdLQRCP0/SHnep4rDtFI/AAAAAAAAAI4/dqHgGq9Zvh8/s1600/ObamaRaceCar2.gif
Love the front license plate……Classic.
The entire list has been whited-out — a complete white-wash. Sinister forces at work.
And you do a mighty fine job Tony.
Thanks.
but, but… the guys at SkS et al. keep telling us that all us sceptics are funded by big oil. !!
but we know who really is getting the funding !
http://theclimatescepticsparty.blogspot.fi/2015/02/bigoils-big-oily-support-for-them-not.html
Andy,
The faux environmentalist had to get that lie out about skeptics and scream it from the hill tops. Think what would have happened if the truth that Shell Oil is enmeshed in the WWF and the IPCC hit the news before they started screaming “Skeptics are funded by BIG OIL!”
I sometimes think the pittance given to Heartland by Exxon was done just to leave a paper trail to provide verisimilitude.
IIRC the donations from Exxon were ear marked for use in education and not for climate chage research.
I read Mosher and he supplied a graph that indicated that temperature adjustments really don’t make any difference. If that is so, how come the HCN raw data, as you have displayed it, dosen’t show any warming in the US?
Then why make adjustments at all? Obviously Mosher’s graph is BS.
I have no idea what mosher is up to. The USHCN data is adjusted upwards, and NCDC literature clearly states that they do adjust upwards.
Amen Tony… Meanwhile Progressive Groups DO get funding based on their support for Climate Change Theory…
Funding and Grants are paid out with OUR TAX DOLLARS… for university studies, climate change advocacy groups, environmental groups, legal organizations… Funded by NASA, EPA, State Department.. And of course sponsored by Big Universities…
For them.,, why stop the flow of money… A huge waterfall of money …
That’s why this whole issue of Public Policy based on data manipulation and FRAUD WITH OUR TAX DOLLARS…. is potentially a huge Case… It would embarrass all these lying Jerk-off’s and cut off the money… Thus cut off more Climate Change nonsense,,,
It’s all just projection, they know that environmental science is 100% government funded, so they accuse us of being funded. Fact is, the oil companies aren’t in the business of hiring environmental scientists to deny science. Oil companies hire geologists to find oil, they hire chemists to refine it, they hire physicists to engineer the refineries. They have absolutely no use for pseudo-scientists like the quack comet chasers in the Cause-a Nostra.
Shell oil has been behind the IPCC ( and WWF) from day one.
Banks, Shell oil and CAGW
http://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/01/24/a-kook-classic/#comment-333708
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/08/03/proof-that-us-warming-is-mann-made-part-2/#comment-401533
(My usual ton of links)
Ged Davis and Agenda 21
Ged Davis was a Shell Oil VP at the same time he was the IPCC lead Author on Scenarios. He wrote the Sustainability/Agenda 21 Scenario.
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2015/01/07/time-for-progressives-to-put-their-money-where-their-mouth-is/#comment-478068
Muller of Best has a private consulting corporation Muller & Associates. Under the Muller & Assoc team you find Marlan Downey
http://mullerandassociates.com/our-team/marlan-downey/
Click on Marlan Downey, Oil and Gas Executive
And guess what ? We find SHELL OIL!
“Marlan Downey, Oil and Gas Executive ….. Former President of the international subsidiary of Shell Oil…..”
Heck CRU was started with funding from Shell Oil, B.P. and the Rockefeller Foundation (Standard Oil)
Any time anyone says skeptics are funded by Big Oil through that lot of links in their face.
Once again, skeptics found to be more knowledgeable on climate science, even when test is skewed.
…says a forthcoming paper in the journal Advances in Political Psychology by Yale Professor Dan Kahan. He finds that skeptics score about the same (in fact slightly better) on climate science questions…
Liberals were more likely to correctly answer questions like: “What gas do most scientists believe causes temperatures to rise?” The correct answer is carbon dioxide.
http://www.foxnews.com/science/2015/02/12/study-global-warming-skeptics-know-more-about-climate-science/
Low information testers lowering skeptic scores with FUBAR questions.
What the hell? Their ‘answer’ is dead wrong!!!
The sun and H2O causes the most global warming.
What about Hydrogen? Without Hydrogen gas powering the Sun not only will the Earth become an ice cube, but it would be impossible for any life to exist, which means that the whole fossil fuel conundrum is solved. No life, no fossil fuels. Send my Nobel prize to Tony. You can find me on the first inter-galactic Grey Hound bus to an alternative home planet, see you.
And where did they get that “most scientists” nonsense from !!!
Really… what stupid, leading, question !
And where did they get that “most scientists” nonsense from !!!
Really… what stupid, leading, question !
I used to work in the wind sector around 2003 and I can tell you that all the big companies were either oil companies or related to oil and these were the massive funders of the wind lobby.
So, the oil companies have always been promoting wind energy and I’ve no doubt they gave massive amounts of money to green NGOs and academics to push climate non-science in order to promote their wind development.
What’s more … what daft person would think that oil companies don’t benefit from governments pushing up the price of fossil fuels?
So the people pushing this “fossil fuel sceptics” are the worst kind of evil scum.
Of course the oil companies are big supporters of wind. Building, installing and running them is a net user of energy so every tower that goes up increases the sales of oil, gas and coal. They not only get to sell the energy to build them they get to sell the extra dispatchable energy that has to be online when they don’t produce. They also get to sell the energy it takes to tear them down and melt them back into objects that are useful for society… like oil burning cars, pipes for clean water and copper for electrical equipment. If we’re really lucky the eco loons will get out of the way and the 3rd World can use the remains of those avian annihilators to get out of the Stone Age by building coal and gas fired power plants that produce inexpensive, RELIABLE electricity.
I can dream, can’t I?
+1
Re: climate scam. My sense is that at this point everybody who has bothered to put the work in to inform themselves know it is a scam. Most Democrats and a few RINO Republicans know it is a scam but don’t care. They are either closely tied to the alternative energy rent seeking business and they have a financial interest in the central planners rigging the system to benefit them financially, or they are hardened environmental zealots and want to see less fossil fuel used for ideological reasons. They don’t care that it will retard economic growth and make it hard for the poor to lift themselves out of poverty. And then there are the Neo-Malthusians who know this is a scam but they can use it to fear monger to make government more involved in rationing resources. The conservative Republicans know it is a scam. They don’t want major political and policy decisions made based on a scam. They care about preserving economic liberty which is the only economic system devised by man that consistently leads to greater prosperity, lifts people out of poverty, and preserves individual liberty.
It is not unlike Obamacare. Everybody knew, just as Gruber said, that Democrats were lying. With Obamacare, Democrat voters didn’t care about the lying either because they are greedy and want someone else to pay for their healthcare or they have a perverted morality system and think using government force to steal money from people who have it and give it to Democrat cronies in Big Insurance to subsidize someone else’s insurance is somehow moral. I can forgive a hungry man for stealing a loaf of bread but the act of stealing the bread was still unethical and morally wrong. Just because you have voted for a government to do the stealing it does not make it any less immoral. So just like everybody knew Democrats were lying with Obamacare, almost everybody knows they are lying about the global warming scam. Democrats entire governing philosophy depends on them being lying thieves. It’s the source of their power.
BUT … what he failed to mention is that his fiancé is paid large grants through fellowships with several Big Fossil front groups. I read it on the Interwebs.
“Wait. What? What??? A Democratic Governor? Grants from Green organizations who were in turn receiving grants from the State?”
There’s no story here. Move along.
Glad to be able to help.
Look for a big decrease in funding for the global warmongers this year thanks to the oil price drop. Oil companies feel duty bound to finance the global warmongering scammers because of political correctness – but money is tight.