Buckhanon, WV has the longest continuous temperature record in the Northeastern US. The number of 90 degree days there is much lower than it was 60 and 120 years ago.
The length of summer is also shorter than it was 60 or 100 years ago.
Climate experts say that summers are getting hotter and longer, because $29 billion in government climate money can buy a whole lot of confirmation bias and outright lies.
Climate is cyclical.
The Old Farmer’s Almanac, whose climatologist have been more accurate than any other climatology group, predict that we will experience global cooling for the next 5-7 decades and that ANYTHING we humans can do to warm things up might even save lives.
I like to see the number of days above 80 or 85. That would be interesting see if it’s the same pattern. I’m guessing yes or it could be more dramatic.
“Climate experts say that summers are getting hotter and longer, because $29 billion in government climate money can buy a whole lot of confirmation bias and outright lies.”
Yep, a whole lot of “Scientists” have been bought and paid for with it. Much of the press that broadcasts their BS however, was already owned before this great scam got off the ground.
Actually the test is either days between last and first frost or days with the mean above 50F
“Agronomists say you shouldn’t plant corn until the soil temperature is 50 degrees F …”
Germination temperatures range between 35°F to 40°F (cool season crops) 50°F to 60°F (warm season crops) depending on the veggie.
Meanwhile over at the American Thinker Blog we find this:
When ‘Weather’ turns to ‘Climate’
By J.R. Dunn
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2015/02/when_weather_turns_to_climate.html
But Jennifer Francis tells us warming is cooling is more snow and less snow and warming and cooling is more snow and the whole thing is amplifying and ….there is a boy and a girl ..
http://youtu.be/Uj_2-A5-e2A
What utter drivel.
You should link to your data source.
I wonder what you would get if you took the longest running rural site in all 50 states and used that unadjusted data set to get a trend for the last 100 years. I doubt the trend would be “scary” at all.
Frank Lansner and Nicolai Skjoldby have don a ton of work looking at the original paper data in Europe.
An explanation of the project:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2014/01/06/the-original-temperatures-project/#comment-1526859
Their English website:
http://hidethedecline.eu/pages/who-are-we.php
They separate coastal and ocean influenced temperature stations from the inland temperature stations. This give a unique way of looking at the data since it removes the PDO and AMO influence from the data sets as much as possible.
The ignorance of this article and the commented who sound so smug and sure that global warming is a hoax are laughably out of touch with the facts. You people clearly cannot understand complex issues and then you act like what makes sense in your head is somehow a statement of fact. Here’s the deal, geniuses. Over 99% of all climate scientists worldwide agree that global warming is real, man-made and not cyclical. This is a fact you can loom up anywhere. Isolating a cooler climate in a region and then completely ignorng the RECORD HIGHS in nearly every part of the country is absurd. Climate change affects the world in many ways. Cooler areas don’t mean that it isn’t happening. And the notion that 99% of global climate scientists are “bought and paid for” is one of the most of ignorant comments I’ve read today. How about the 1% that deny it and actually are employed by oil and gas companies? Yeah, I’m sure they’re the honest ones and not being paid off. Retards, all of you.