Strong amounts of recent urban warming have corrupted the temperature record, and forced NASA experts to further warm the newer urban regions, and further cool the older more rural areas. If this seems counter intuitive, that is simply because your paycheck doesn’t depend on pushing a particular agenda.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
- Deadliest US Tornado Days
- The Other Side Of The Pond
- “HEMI V8 Roars Back”
- Big Pharma Sales Tool
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- 622 billion tons of new ice
- Fossil Fuels To Turn The UK Tropical
- 100% Tariffs On Chinese EV’s
- Fossil Fuels Cause Fungus
- Prophets Of Doom
- The Green New Deal Lives On
- Mission Accomplished!
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on Elon’s Hockey Stick
- conrad ziefle on “Earlier Than Usual”
- spren on “Climate dread is everywhere”
- spren on “Earlier Than Usual”
- czechlist on “Earlier Than Usual”
- conrad ziefle on Perfect Correlation
- conrad ziefle on “Earlier Than Usual”
- conrad ziefle on “Earlier Than Usual”
- arn on “Earlier Than Usual”
- Mac on “Earlier Than Usual”
I notice that NASA today launched a satellite to study soil moisture levels to help to deal with floods and droughts. Call me a neanderthal but is that really something we can’t do without? You can’t effectively, and much less expensively, study soil moisture levels from right here on terra firma?
Easier to fake it from space
Yeah, and also, by measuring from space, the data is not watered down (!) by looking at deeper soil horizons or anything like that.
This is yet again another “instrument” designed to yell “fire” in a crowded theater. From the “Science” part of the mission site, emphasis mine:
It doesn’t get any better when you read how this thing’s supposed to work it’s even worse. From the “Instrument” part of the mission site, emphasis mine:
Accurate estimates? And this thing will be smart enough to tell the difference between wet grass and wet dirt… I’m not buying any of it. Maybe it would work on a desert but anywhere else is gonna be a crap shoot. And I got to help pay for it…. Arghhhh!
https://chiefio.wordpress.com/2015/01/31/some-more-trouble-with-temperatures-and-nice-analysis/
Some good articles here game over now
Also important if a station cools, remove it just like the Melbourne station was because started cooling too much surrounded by concrete buildings. New form of “Science”
Melbourne and surrounds have hundreds of temperature monitors. Loosing one due to an issue will not make any difference.
More funding = More bullshit outta NASA…
Progressives always refer to “the Science” without ever daring to look into it themselves… 2014 Coldest Year Ever??… How?… These tools demand we deny the obvious… Accelerating Sea Level Rise while the Planet grows more and more ICE??… Total Garbage …
How much snow will fall in Boston?
http://earth.nullschool.net/#2015/02/02/0900Z/wind/surface/level/overlay=total_cloud_water/orthographic=-96.26,33.36,1581