Strong amounts of recent urban warming have corrupted the temperature record, and forced NASA experts to further warm the newer urban regions, and further cool the older more rural areas. If this seems counter intuitive, that is simply because your paycheck doesn’t depend on pushing a particular agenda.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
- arn on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- conrad ziefle on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution In Greece
- Bob G on Climate Attribution In Greece
I notice that NASA today launched a satellite to study soil moisture levels to help to deal with floods and droughts. Call me a neanderthal but is that really something we can’t do without? You can’t effectively, and much less expensively, study soil moisture levels from right here on terra firma?
Easier to fake it from space
Yeah, and also, by measuring from space, the data is not watered down (!) by looking at deeper soil horizons or anything like that.
This is yet again another “instrument” designed to yell “fire” in a crowded theater. From the “Science” part of the mission site, emphasis mine:
It doesn’t get any better when you read how this thing’s supposed to work it’s even worse. From the “Instrument” part of the mission site, emphasis mine:
Accurate estimates? And this thing will be smart enough to tell the difference between wet grass and wet dirt… I’m not buying any of it. Maybe it would work on a desert but anywhere else is gonna be a crap shoot. And I got to help pay for it…. Arghhhh!
https://chiefio.wordpress.com/2015/01/31/some-more-trouble-with-temperatures-and-nice-analysis/
Some good articles here game over now
Also important if a station cools, remove it just like the Melbourne station was because started cooling too much surrounded by concrete buildings. New form of “Science”
Melbourne and surrounds have hundreds of temperature monitors. Loosing one due to an issue will not make any difference.
More funding = More bullshit outta NASA…
Progressives always refer to “the Science” without ever daring to look into it themselves… 2014 Coldest Year Ever??… How?… These tools demand we deny the obvious… Accelerating Sea Level Rise while the Planet grows more and more ICE??… Total Garbage …
How much snow will fall in Boston?
http://earth.nullschool.net/#2015/02/02/0900Z/wind/surface/level/overlay=total_cloud_water/orthographic=-96.26,33.36,1581