Strong amounts of recent urban warming have corrupted the temperature record, and forced NASA experts to further warm the newer urban regions, and further cool the older more rural areas. If this seems counter intuitive, that is simply because your paycheck doesn’t depend on pushing a particular agenda.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- NPR Climate Experts
- Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- “Siberia might stay livable”
- Deep Thinking From The Atlantic
- Making Up Fake Numbers At CBS News
- Your Tax Dollars At Work
- “experts warn”
- End Of Snow Update
- CBS News Defines Free Speech
- “Experts Warn”
- Consensus Science With Remarkable Precision
- Is New York About To Drown?
- “Anti-science conservatives must be stopped”
- Disappearing New York
- New York To Drown Soon
- “halt steadily increasing climate extremism”
- “LARGE PART OF NORTHERN CALIF ABLAZE”
- Climate Trends In The Congo
- “100% noncarbon energy mix by 2030”
- Understanding The US Government
- Cooling Australia’s Past
- Saving The World From Fossil Fuels
- Propaganda Based Forecasting
- “He Who Must Not Be Named”
Recent Comments
- mwhite on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- Bob G on Grok 3 Trusts The Government
- arn on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- William on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- gordon vigurs on “Siberia might stay livable”
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on NPR Climate Experts
- conrad ziefle on Defending Democracy In Ukraine
- conrad ziefle on “Siberia might stay livable”
- Timo, not that one! on “Siberia might stay livable”
I notice that NASA today launched a satellite to study soil moisture levels to help to deal with floods and droughts. Call me a neanderthal but is that really something we can’t do without? You can’t effectively, and much less expensively, study soil moisture levels from right here on terra firma?
Easier to fake it from space
Yeah, and also, by measuring from space, the data is not watered down (!) by looking at deeper soil horizons or anything like that.
This is yet again another “instrument” designed to yell “fire” in a crowded theater. From the “Science” part of the mission site, emphasis mine:
It doesn’t get any better when you read how this thing’s supposed to work it’s even worse. From the “Instrument” part of the mission site, emphasis mine:
Accurate estimates? And this thing will be smart enough to tell the difference between wet grass and wet dirt… I’m not buying any of it. Maybe it would work on a desert but anywhere else is gonna be a crap shoot. And I got to help pay for it…. Arghhhh!
https://chiefio.wordpress.com/2015/01/31/some-more-trouble-with-temperatures-and-nice-analysis/
Some good articles here game over now
Also important if a station cools, remove it just like the Melbourne station was because started cooling too much surrounded by concrete buildings. New form of “Science”
Melbourne and surrounds have hundreds of temperature monitors. Loosing one due to an issue will not make any difference.
More funding = More bullshit outta NASA…
Progressives always refer to “the Science” without ever daring to look into it themselves… 2014 Coldest Year Ever??… How?… These tools demand we deny the obvious… Accelerating Sea Level Rise while the Planet grows more and more ICE??… Total Garbage …
How much snow will fall in Boston?
http://earth.nullschool.net/#2015/02/02/0900Z/wind/surface/level/overlay=total_cloud_water/orthographic=-96.26,33.36,1581