If NCDC announced in four weeks that February was the hottest ever in the US, 95% of Democrats would believe it, and ridicule anyone who didn’t.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Making Themselves Irrelevant
- Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- COP29 Preview
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- A Giant Eyesore
- CO2 To Destroy The World In Ten Years
- Rats Jumping Off The Climate Ship
- UK Labour To Save The Planet
- “False Claims” And Outright Lies”
- Michael Mann Cancelled By CNN
- Spoiled Children
- Great Lakes Storm Of November 11, 1835
- Harris To Win Iowa
- Angry Democrats
- November 9, 1913 Storm
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
Recent Comments
- GW on A Giant Eyesore
- conrad ziefle on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Greg in NZ on Making Themselves Irrelevant
- arn on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- Trevor on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- czechlist on Michael Mann Predicts The Demise Of X
- arn on COP29 Preview
- arn on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on COP29 Preview
- conrad ziefle on Making Themselves Irrelevant
HOTTEST FEBRUARY EVAH! At least, in LA. 🙂
LA is the only place that counts now that Boston is buried under snow.
Ain’t that the truth!
Michael Mann and his hockey stick. Dragged where he didn’t want to go. A ‘reluctant figure’ in the Climate Change debate. lol
“This was not what I envisioned I would be doing when I chose to be a scientist, but over time I have grown to embrace this role,” said Mann. “I feel privileged to be in a position to inform the larger public discourse over what may be the greatest challenge civilization has faced.”
Read more at: http://phys.org/news/2015-02-iconic-graph-center-climate-debate.html#jCp
http://phys.org/news/2015-02-iconic-graph-center-climate-debate.html
PLEEEeaase, I just ate dinner.
sorry 😉
It is nauseating, I agree.
” may be the greatest challenge civilization has faced.”
Is almost certainly OVERCOMING the climate / world governance agenda.
A big BINGO!
Keep diggin’ ( Mann)
These people just don’t quit on dumbing down the masses. Climate change effecting Kennedy Space Center. (forcing them to build dunes to protect from erosion). Anywhere you have a body of water, esp. with waves, you have erosion.
http://www.clickorlando.com/news/researchers-rising-sea-levels-having-effects-at-kennedy-space-center/31221582
So, “climate change” now changes the direction waves come into a beach?
I guess so. Never has been erosion until modern man.
The conveniently omit the fact that we are constantly rebuilding the beaches on the coast. It’s called erosion and has been happening since we… well, since the planet was forming.
yep
Where did all that sand come from anyway?
good question for NASA
Speaking of “hottest ever” announcements, NOAA announced in 1997 that it was hotter than 2014:
http://tomnelson.blogspot.ca/2015/02/noaa-settled-science-earth-at-5824f-in.html
I guess it received the Ministry Of Truth treatment.
OK, sorry for the totally dumb layman question here, but which year WAS the warmest?
*Please note my bolding*
1997:
The global average temperature of 62.45 degrees Fahrenheit for 1997 was the warmest year on record…The chart reflects variations from the 30-year average (1961-1990)…
2014:
…The annually-averaged temperature was 0.69°C (1.24°F) above the 20th century average of 13.9°C (57.0°F),…[or 58.24°F]
Also, IIRC, didn’t Hansen/GISS change the ‘global average’ temperature sometime in the early 2000’s from 15°C or 14.5°C or similar?
The super El Nino of 1977-1978 produced the warmist year ever, that is why Steve prefers the satellite data.
Here is the back-up evidence that shows the satellite data is the more reasonable information.
#1. NASA shows there has been a change in the distribution of wavelengths in the energy spectrum coming from the sun. The visible to EUV wavelengths can change from 1% to 100% at the EUV end of the spectrum.
http://science.nasa.gov/science-news/science-at-nasa/2009/01apr_deepsolarminimum/
http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/sdo/science/Solar%20Irradiance.html
The oceans absorb these higher wavelengths:
http://www.klimaatfraude.info/images/sverdrup.gif
There is also a UV/Ozone/wind ===> wind driven Antarctic circumpolar current ==> Humboldt Current ===> El Niño connection
If you look at this Sea Surface Temperature map it has a good image of the tongue of cold water from the Antarctic Circumpolar Current just before Drake Passage, headed up the coast of South America to Galapagos. This is the Humboldt Current. The presents, absense and strength of this current will help determine wether there is an El Niño, El Nina or El Niño Modoki
http://weather.unisys.com/archive/sst/sst-140119.gif
Links to other comments with a lot more detail on ENSO and Antarctica.
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/12/19/spectacular-cheating-on-the-noaa-report-card/#comment-470727
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/03/26/much-of-alaska-was-ice-free-during-the-last-ice-age/#comment-331818
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/03/21/lies-damned-lies-and-global-warming/#comment-329313
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2014/11/29/us-drought-area-down-80-from-80-years-ago/#comment-465251
There was also a major change in albedo as measured by the Earthshine project:
https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2007/10/earth_albedo_bbso.png
If it were any hotter the Great Lakes might freeze 100%
http://www.glerl.noaa.gov/res/glcfs/compare_years/
I have the feeling the Mayor of Boston would like to take the tons of Global Warming and dump it on Washington DC about now or shove it….[fill in the blank]
At the very least he is honest….”I am full of hope it will stop eventually.”
One could almost hope that this is the first summer the snow didn’t melt for New England. It might make a difference in the 2016 elections.
Clearly the statistic of an “average” temperature across disparate locations is meaningless. Not only that but the variability of temperatures within a region completely swamps any “systemic trend” whether that trend is named “climate change” or “global warming”. Of course knowing this will not stop the “experts” from pretending otherwise.
Above all, we have to save the world from its self-proclaimed saviours who brandish the threat of great chaos in order to impose their lethal impulses.” Pascal Bruckner, The Fanaticism of the Apocalypse
Well my guess is that the Blue Bloods are just thinking that what is happening is the “C” in CAGW.
You easterners are sure selfish with your winter, hogging all of it, we could use a little of it going into march . We have had no winter in northeast wyoming since the first of november . Just send use some moisture none of that global warming cold stuff you people seem to enjoy so much.
The argument gets myopic when claims of “hottest ever” are for small areas when everyone else in the world is feeling cold. if the temperature of the world remains unchanged using UAH or RSS, then any claim to any day, or month being the hottest is just a load of crap.
The North American West Coast is the world.
The rest of us are nobody. Seriously. Warm there=entire planet. Cold on half the planet=local temporary weather.
+1
More Dumb, More infectious diseases because of Climate Change.
http://phys.org/news/2015-02-infectious-diseases-emerging-climate.html
This means no diseases for us living in the frigid north!
I wouldn’t bet that NCDC won’t do exactly that.
Alarmists might swallow it, they think that when they are not believed that all they need is “better communication”. But you can only convince a sceptic if you give them the data.
(And yes the data is now available at that linke to prove it!)