A new scary Friday the 13th movie is premiering in DC tomorrow, only this time the whole planet is doomed.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ivy Echo Chamber
- Climate Homicide
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Homophobic Gas
- World Bank Expectations
- Trained Not To Learn
- Protecting Endangered Species
- Record Climate Cynicism
- Record Cynicism
- The Latest In Climate Science Rhetoric
- Climate Desperation
- Artificial Stupidity
- Climate Obsession
- The Climate Empire Strikes Back
- Climate Scam Parrots
- “I’ve dealt with him before ”
- “I’ve dealt with him before.”
- “BE HONEST”
- Turn Out The Lights – The Party’s Over
- Net Zero In The UK
- Turn Out The Lights, The Party Is Over
- Michael Mann Again
- Over The Target
- Michael Mann’s Latest Research
- “an amazing documentary dismantling the climate change theory”
Recent Comments
- Bert on Ivy Echo Chamber
- Conrad Ziefle on Climate Homicide
- Conrad Ziefle on Climate Homicide
- Russell Cook on Climate Homicide
- czechlist on Ivy Echo Chamber
- Russell Cook on Climate Homicide
- Dan A Sinema on Climate Homicide
- MLH on Homophobic Gas
- Billyjack on Climate Homicide
- Laurie on Ivy Echo Chamber
Merchants of Doubt = Truth in advertising.
The “Merchants” I recommend is Robert Zubrin’ s book Merchants of Despair. Subtitle is Radical Environmentalists, Criminal Pseudo-Scientists, and the Fatal Cult of Antihumanism. 45 pages of bibliography: well referenced, and one of the saddest books I have ever read.
The real merchants of doubt are those who want us to doubt nature’s ability to change climate.
Ohhh yea .. no ad hom here .. no DOUBT y’all fear the TRUTH the film covers.
(maybe it’s the doom of your sowing doubt career you sense)
Tomorrow is Friday the 13th, dear. These things seem to fly right over your head. I’m looking forward to meeting the people behind this scam tomorrow.
What does NOT fly over your head .. but what you do on purpose ..
… is take that fact – add a Freddy Kugar wallpaper and a little bombast frosting; “only this time the whole planet is doomed” and make a nice little attack piece ..
… as you complain to me in emails that the left alone does this.
Doesn’t bother you that Singer simply sold doubt about tobacco danger in his last gig .. and now just does the same for climate?
Fred is a great guy. Intelligent and honest. Unlike your friends.
Hopeless is that stupid she thinks Freddy Krueger (correct spelling) was in the Friday the 13th movies.
Hopeless dear, Freddy Krueger was in the Nightmare on Elm Street movies….Jason was in Friday the 13th.
But you knew that didn’t you Hopeless, because those of us who have been trained by the fossil fuel industry are too stupid and dumb and know absolutely nothing.
BTW Hopeless, did you know that both Al Gore’s – Alliance for Climate Protection and the David Suzuki Foundation have received grants from The Rockefeller Brothers Fund (totaling ~$435,000), meanwhile…..
The Heartland Institute
The Cato Institute
The Global Warming Policy Foundation (GWPF)
Committee For A Constructive Tomorrow (CFACT)
= $0.00
The irony is that Hope doesn’t care to understand the referenced film is itself an ad hominem attack.
She doesn’t get it, but our British friends will, especially those who haven’t stopped being British as of last year:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9EH1G4EwljM
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WF08XACmCSc
Hope’s theme song.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nauLgZISozs
What I love is well all this plays in this little world … out in the grown up world this sort of thing just discredits you .. as it should.
What I love is HOW well all this plays in this little world … out in the grown up world this sort of thing just discredits you .. as it should.
What I love is how you run away from this very simple question
Did Judge Loftin lie when he signed this legal document…
The court, having reviewed the law and evidence as well as motions, briefs and arguments of the counsel of this case denies plaintiffs section 27 Anti-Slapp motion to dismiss Range’s counter claims. The court references with concerns the actions of Steven Lipsky, under the advice or direction of Mrs Alicia Rich to intentionally attach a garden hose to a gas vent – not to a water line – and then light and burn the gas from the end of the nozzle of the hose. The demonstration was not done for scientific study but to provide local and national news media a deceptive video, calculated to alarm the public into believing the water was burning. There is further evidence that Rich knew the regional EPA administration and provided or assisted in providing additional mislead information (including the garden hose video) to alarm the EPA. More over the emails in question which refer to this deceptive garden hose demonstration as a “strategy” appear to support that a “meeting of the minds” took place and that a reasonable trier of fact could believe, together with other evidence, That elements of a conspiracy to defame Range exist.
Therefore pursuant to Texas practice and Remedies code 27 as a finding of fact and conclusion of law, the court observes that Range has presented sufficient clear and specific evidence to maintain a prima facia case with regard to the counter claim against plaintiffs and the third party action against Lisa Rich in that a reasonable trier of fact could believe that a conspiracy to defame Range existed between Lipsky and Mrs Rich.
http://www.barnettshalenews.com/documents/2012/legal/Court%20Order%20Denial%20of%20Lipsky%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss%20Range%20Counterclaim%202-16-2012.pdf
Yes or no? 😆
Is above your brain grade? 😆
What up B? 😆
Hope, you are correct … there was no ad hom here.
Oppsss .. guess I should have added the …. /s .. y’all wouldn’t get it sans that.
Hope, thank you for confirming to everyone that you have absolutely no ability in English comprehension and no ability to actually apply any thought to what you write.
You are very useful as a large, slow moving target that can be used as an example of how the Progressive side of the debate is inept, illogical, dishonest and hypocritical.
Please continue. More ammunition is always better.
Hope, instead of just throwing out ad hominem attacks, which serve no purpose, why don’t pick some aspect, like historical temps, hurricanes, drought, back radiation,
oscillations within the CO2 molecule that absorb certain IR frequencies, greening of the earth, that is anything at any level and state what you think are the facts which can be discussed.
“No Hope for you!” said the Soup Nazi.
I can’t wait to hear about all the new information the real merchants of doom are going to share this time. And geniuses like you will pay to see it! Just go re-read all the press releases of the past 20 years and save yourself some money, HOPE.
It was a really big flop.
Did you expect anything else from another member of the denial team??
You are the denier of natural climate change, I would never be so stupid as to deny climate change as it has happened for 4,500,000,000 years.
Now answer the question weasel. Did Judge loftis lie when he signed this court document?
The court, having reviewed the law and evidence as well as motions, briefs and arguments of the counsel of this case denies plaintiffs section 27 Anti-Slapp motion to dismiss Range’s counter claims. The court references with concerns the actions of Steven Lipsky, under the advice or direction of Mrs Alicia Rich to intentionally attach a garden hose to a gas vent – not to a water line – and then light and burn the gas from the end of the nozzle of the hose. The demonstration was not done for scientific study but to provide local and national news media a deceptive video, calculated to alarm the public into believing the water was burning. There is further evidence that Rich knew the regional EPA administration and provided or assisted in providing additional mislead information (including the garden hose video) to alarm the EPA. More over the emails in question which refer to this deceptive garden hose demonstration as a “strategy” appear to support that a “meeting of the minds” took place and that a reasonable trier of fact could believe, together with other evidence, That elements of a conspiracy to defame Range exist.
Therefore pursuant to Texas practice and Remedies code 27 as a finding of fact and conclusion of law, the court observes that Range has presented sufficient clear and specific evidence to maintain a prima facia case with regard to the counter claim against plaintiffs and the third party action against Lisa Rich in that a reasonable trier of fact could believe that a conspiracy to defame Range existed between Lipsky and Mrs Rich.
http://www.barnettshalenews.com/documents/2012/legal/Court%20Order%20Denial%20of%20Lipsky%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss%20Range%20Counterclaim%202-16-2012.pdf
Yes or no dummy! 😆
“….member of the denial team….”
A Hope get out of the conversation clause.
Thanks for more proof of you lack of factual information.
So, no defence of this total flop of fictional BS, Didn’t think so.
What sort of SUV do you drive?
and who is paying you ?
Bohr and J. R. Oppenheimer (not to be confused with the current Oppenheimer)
what credentials!!!!
Ought be watched on April 1st.. just for blind, wilfully ignorant idiots like you !!
I wonder what K-K-K-Katie’s husband thinks about violation of the 9th commandment?
Proudly sponsored by Pravda! I suppose they are getting a HUGE bonus from Steyer for this,
Q&A with Michael E Mann? I would like to see those questions in advance. Just like his handlers/attorneys will.
I got email from Naomi Oreskes, and then the film’s director, Robert Kenner
https://tallbloke.wordpress.com/2015/03/12/merchants-of-spin-part-2-now-the-films-director-has-emailed-me/
Too funny.
I don’t recall the theory of evolution being mainstreamed by fascism. I seem to recall a very famous debate. Has science changed?
If your theory cannot stand up to criticism, it is a belief. Believe what ever you want, but do not force your beliefs on the nonbelievers. Fundamental Islam and AGW have much in common.
Having Hope around strong enhances the idea that humans are DEVOLVING !!
Its like trying to teach a 3-toed sloth to count to 2. ..
She seriously is THAT THICK !!!!
Roger, I am wondering how Naomi and Roger expect television producers/bookers to be able to identify a “denier?” Perhaps they will start advocating the placement of a numerical tattoo on the forearm of those they designate “deniers.”
I need a proofreader: Robert, not Roger.
Don’t worry. the way we are headed they will probably force deniers to wear some type of indicator on their clothing. Perhaps a yellow star of david, but thats been done before.
A yellow sun?
Tallbloke
RE your reply above: Well done, but I think the Stefan-B. constant/equation being ill-applied is not the only error.
Another issue, J. C. at Climate etc currently has a thread on the ‘Albedo of the Earth’
Very important, and another mountain for the alarmists to climb.
All in all, like the news media looking for bad news, it is a tenant of the alarmists to look for positive feedback, when negative (good) feedback dominates the earth system.
I suggest the earth is constantly out of equilibrium and whenever disturbed, feedback will tend to draw it back to a favorable balance.
All the nation needs to see is the mindset of this group .. it is represented so well here.
Genius! Hello! Did Judge Loftin lie when he signed this court document?
The court, having reviewed the law and evidence as well as motions, briefs and arguments of the counsel of this case denies plaintiffs section 27 Anti-Slapp motion to dismiss Range’s counter claims. The court references with concerns the actions of Steven Lipsky, under the advice or direction of Mrs Alicia Rich to intentionally attach a garden hose to a gas vent – not to a water line – and then light and burn the gas from the end of the nozzle of the hose. The demonstration was not done for scientific study but to provide local and national news media a deceptive video, calculated to alarm the public into believing the water was burning. There is further evidence that Rich knew the regional EPA administration and provided or assisted in providing additional mislead information (including the garden hose video) to alarm the EPA. More over the emails in question which refer to this deceptive garden hose demonstration as a “strategy” appear to support that a “meeting of the minds” took place and that a reasonable trier of fact could believe, together with other evidence, That elements of a conspiracy to defame Range exist.
Therefore pursuant to Texas practice and Remedies code 27 as a finding of fact and conclusion of law, the court observes that Range has presented sufficient clear and specific evidence to maintain a prima facia case with regard to the counter claim against plaintiffs and the third party action against Lisa Rich in that a reasonable trier of fact could believe that a conspiracy to defame Range existed between Lipsky and Mrs Rich.
http://www.barnettshalenews.com/documents/2012/legal/Court%20Order%20Denial%20of%20Lipsky%20Motion%20to%20Dismiss%20Range%20Counterclaim%202-16-2012.pdf
Yes or no stupid. Try connecting the few brain cells that may exist in your straw head and answer.
Hope, there is nothing preventing anyone from seeing this blog.
Instead of you making up a bunch of crap based on your inability to follow the discussion, why not send people over to see it for themselves? They might be smarter than you.
“They might be smarter than you.”
Not if they are her friends !!
Sum IQ in 2 digits !!
Hope:
You are using a highly unusual spelling of your display name.
The first letter is supposed to represent a voiced alveolar stop, i.e. a consonant articulated with the blade of the tongue at the alveolar ridge, with vocal cords vibrating until all airflow ceases.
The consonant is not represented by an “H” in any of the languages I speak or know. I recommend that you fix it before the whole nation comes and sees it. It’s one thing to post crap but quite another to post crap under a misspelled name.
How do you spell, “asdumbaspigshit”? … H . O . P . E
HOPE
See my comment above, I am waiting for you to present something substantial that we can debate.
If you don’t then I know you have nothing.
“All the nation needs to see is the mindset of this group’
Ah you mean HayHoe, Mickey Mann…et al..
Their minds are set in putrid squirming ooze.. no wonder you worship them.
None would dare to take on any of the sceptical real scientists. None ever have dared.
Here’s a mind set I Love seeing. Lots of negative press for Robert Downey Jr. in the past but here Iron Man show’s his true colors and their bright and beautiful. Notice how he stays in character.
[youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oEx5lmbCKtY?feature=player_detailpage&w=640&h=360%5D
They gave up debating skeptics after Lord Monckton wiped the floor with them at Oxford.
Lord Monckton wins global warming debate at Oxford Union
They know they can not win the debate because they have been defeated and in the five years since 2010 Skeptics have gathered more and more facts that refute CAGW. All CAGW has left is a bag full of dirty tricks, not science.
+1
But it was never about science. It began with dirty tricks from the very beginning – when then-US Senator (later United Nations Foundation President-now Vice Chair on its Board) Tim Wirth scheduled the 1988 Jim Hansen presentation before Congress on the historically hottest day of the year, and then opened all the windows to the hearing room the night before in order to overload the A/C system. (Tim Wirth’s own account of how it went down in a PBS interview.)
Hope, I am so looking forward to the debate between you and Steve!
You agreed to it in a previous thread, but I can’t seem to find when you’ve scheduled it.
So please tell us, when exactly will you debate Steve?
We don’t want to miss it!
Sort of off topic, but Nuccitelli has a book out and Greg Laden is pimping it for him. It’s called “Climatology Versus Pseudoscience: Exposing the Failed Predictions of Global Warming Skeptics”. It’s at Amazon (for $45!) and already has 3 stars (1 five star, 1 one star lol). Part of Laden’s pimping is showing a graph of Cook and Nutty’s proof of 97% consensus. I suppose somehow that’s supposed to illustrate a “failed skeptic prediction”.
As far as I know, the skeptics arent making predictions, they’re simply asking the alarmist proponents for proofs of their theory. And so far they’ve offered lots of innuendo but mostly badly performing computer models. Oh yes, and a slew of failed predictions. But like Harold Camping, there’s always a reason that the last one failed but just you wait – the next one will be true.
I wont be watching Oreskes imaginings, including whether she incorporated her last warnings of household pets all dying. She is rather Freddy Kruger-like now that you bring it up.
+10
The only prediction I know of is from Dr. Evans Notch-Delay Solar theory. Dr Evans is specific on his predictions of a drop in temperature of at least 0.2°C, maybe 0.5°C starting in 2017.
Go to the link for direction to the explanation and discussion of the theory. Several others have also made similar predictions based on the sun but none as nice and clear cut as Dr Evans. For example:Russian Academy Of Sciences Experts Warn Of Imminent Cold Period: “Global Warming Is A Marketing Trick”
There is only other ‘prediction’ I know of, and it is more nebulous is this:
A newer paper from the fall of 2012 a href=”http://www.clim-past.net/8/1473/2012/cp-8-1473-2012.pdf”>Can we predict the duration of an interglacial? agrees and gives the calculated solar insolation values @ 65N on June 22 for several glacial inceptions:
Current value – insolation = 479W m?2 (from that paper)
MIS 7e – insolation = 463 W m?2,
MIS 11c – insolation = 466 W m?2,
MIS 13a – insolation = 500 W m?2,
MIS 15a – insolation = 480 W m?2,
MIS 17 – insolation = 477 W m?2
(Changes near the north polar area, about 65 degrees North, are considered important due to the great amount of land. Land masses respond to temperature change more quickly than oceans.)
You can see why there is an argument. Solar insolation isn’t a cut and dried measure for glacial inception. Steve BTW thinks the Holocene will go long.
Either way the climate is not going to warm for the next 65,000 years. The earth will have an unstable climate caused by being near the glaciation threshold if it follows the MIS 11 pattern. The Holocene has been quite the stable interglacial compared to the others. That may end quite soon and it has nothing to do with CO2.
Hpoes’s predictable response of “those are just talking points put out by the fossil fuel industry!” in 3….2…..
You can talk to Hope right now, if you look to the right.
No, No Gator you have to look LEFT.
Why is everyone hiding from Hope?
Because we are afraid insanity is catching.
You get it from trying to carry out a rational logical discussion with an emoting leftist.
Running away wins no battles.
Actually I have leaped into the fray on occasion. Now I am afraid it is off to bed.
Unfortunately with the comments up to 600+ my computer is now threatening to crash if I load that page. It has crashed opera three times today.
Hope is waiting for us to log off, so she can thread bomb. Mark my words.
I have someone else begging for my attention now, and she aint a crazy troll looking liar, so Hope can have it til morning. Expect more mindless barking about a case nobody has heard, and lies about Loftin’s ruling.
Incessant strawmaning from the original strawtroll. If only she had a brain.
Where are Hope’s friends?
I’m thinking there may be a little team effort going on there?
I know there is.
If you look through the 600+ comments, someone brought up the adjustments to the temperature record and we got the one sentence “those are just talking points put out by the fossil fuel industry!” or what ever denying any adjustment s had been made.
Later when I and a couple others discussed the adjustments, she acknowledge the adjustments were done but were legit. A complete about face and no name calling.
Liars cannot keep up with their nebulous stories, Telling the truth is easy because you only have to memorize one set of facts per subject. Crazy people like Hope are all over the map. One minute she said that the document was not a court ruling and the next said it was. She calls me a liar for quoting Loftins order, but then refuses to call Loftin a liar. I cite a ruling and she strawmans a case unheard.
Off her meds.
Or just having a bad “change”.
What I don’t understand is that she says she has a child, but obviously spends zero time with him/her. I suspect the child has actually been taken out of harms way, which is why she is so bitter and twisted.
Her whole life is spent on forums, where she is a loud-mouth ignorant non-entity, getting abuse for being so stupid.
That takes a very special sort of inner ugliness !!
3 of them for a new movie..
Dumb, Dumber and DUMBEST !!!
More likely her “child” is Gaia whom she takes care of by sitting in a comfy chair in her heated home at her electrically powered computer. She should go out and plant some trees instead.