Midwest summers used to be much hotter, but the frequency of 90 degree days has plummeted over the past 85 years.
Look for climate experts and government officials to continue lying about hot weather, for as long as they can get away with it.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Ivy Echo Chamber
- Climate Homicide
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Homophobic Gas
- World Bank Expectations
- Trained Not To Learn
- Protecting Endangered Species
- Record Climate Cynicism
- Record Cynicism
- The Latest In Climate Science Rhetoric
- Climate Desperation
- Artificial Stupidity
- Climate Obsession
- The Climate Empire Strikes Back
- Climate Scam Parrots
- “I’ve dealt with him before ”
- “I’ve dealt with him before.”
- “BE HONEST”
- Turn Out The Lights – The Party’s Over
- Net Zero In The UK
- Turn Out The Lights, The Party Is Over
- Michael Mann Again
- Over The Target
- Michael Mann’s Latest Research
- “an amazing documentary dismantling the climate change theory”
Recent Comments
- Bert on Ivy Echo Chamber
- Conrad Ziefle on Climate Homicide
- Conrad Ziefle on Climate Homicide
- Russell Cook on Climate Homicide
- czechlist on Ivy Echo Chamber
- Russell Cook on Climate Homicide
- Dan A Sinema on Climate Homicide
- MLH on Homophobic Gas
- Billyjack on Climate Homicide
- Laurie on Ivy Echo Chamber
And 75% of those hot days are caused by your SUV, or something… squirrel!
“Remember the nineties, when we we’re put in a panic;
Global warming was coming, it would all get quite manic.
The temperatures would rise like never before,
Doom and disaster for us all, of that they were sure…”
Read more: http://wp.me/p3KQlH-6X
Corn is very sensative to high temperatures. The corn yield graph is an exact inverse of that chart.
It is not all temp related as genetic varieties, farming techniques, etc have improved dramatically, but the hot summer of 2012 showed that heat trumps all the tech we can throw at farming.
Plants don’t have a political agenda.
Winnipeg. Living here in Southern MN where there is extremely rich corn growing soil,
I find your information very interesting
Thank You
R squared on trend yield miss vs %>90F is .57. That is a very high correlation for a weather input.
A study showed that heat is as much of a determining factor for the corn crop as rain. For example, the summer of 1918 was a fairly normal summer in the US corn belt, except for about 5 days of extreme heat in early August, when it was well over 100 degrees. Good rains and cooler weather followed, but just that one brief heatwave reduced the crop by approximately 10%
Actually a cool, dry summer usually has above average yields. .
Tony: can i get that data in table form? I would like to add to my corn yield chart and send to customers.
First and last columns
1930 32 7420 10.41828
1931 32 8934 12.46355
1932 32 5556 7.74474
1933 32 8794 12.27698
1934 32 9705 13.57589
1935 32 5483 7.64607
1936 32 10851 14.95225
1937 32 7060 9.77095
1938 32 5660 7.81671
1939 32 6771 9.361
1940 32 5649 7.81436
1941 32 7726 10.56822
1942 32 4440 6.09572
1943 32 5961 8.17303
1944 32 7061 9.67181
1945 32 3794 5.23354
1946 32 4047 5.56909
1947 32 6481 8.86048
1948 32 5255 7.14247
1949 32 5345 7.3087
1950 32 1412 1.92297
1951 32 2509 3.39908
1952 32 7008 9.44538
1953 32 8222 10.99698
1954 32 7273 9.80242
1955 32 7907 10.60374
1956 32 4755 6.38641
1957 32 4150 5.52884
1958 32 2359 3.15063
1959 32 5554 7.43806
1960 32 3859 5.10153
1961 32 3386 4.4856
1962 32 3858 5.05967
1963 32 4713 6.15515
1964 32 6743 8.79908
1965 32 2976 3.90613
1966 32 4938 6.45676
1967 32 1999 2.60987
1968 32 4313 5.69606
1969 32 3425 4.48857
1970 32 4570 5.93206
1971 32 4128 5.33789
1972 32 3873 4.99336
1973 32 4015 5.27554
1974 32 3454 4.53102
1975 32 4923 6.4547
1976 32 4170 5.46684
1977 32 4793 6.2267
1978 32 4646 6.11042
1979 32 2241 2.92578
1980 32 6615 8.59951
1981 32 2423 3.09902
1982 32 2256 2.88134
1983 32 8535 10.90735
1984 32 4122 5.31624
1985 32 2800 3.57855
1986 32 3541 4.56438
1987 32 6017 7.6869
1988 32 9420 11.93992
1989 32 3173 4.00606
1990 32 3234 4.06961
1991 32 5737 7.16042
1992 32 1034 1.29517
1993 32 2688 3.39922
1994 32 2884 3.62977
1995 32 4951 6.2905
1996 32 2455 3.15063
1997 32 2776 3.54643
1998 32 3582 4.60678
1999 32 5039 6.42418
2000 32 2282 2.96695
2001 32 3903 5.1427
2002 32 5743 7.55767
2003 32 2788 3.76111
2004 32 911 1.21431
2005 32 5189 7.00516
2006 32 3871 5.2405
2007 32 4577 6.30293
2008 32 1492 2.07513
2009 32 1262 1.79665
2010 32 4074 5.84782
2011 32 4771 6.9355
2012 32 7056 10.45132
2013 32 2691 4.10601
2014 32 1133 1.78063
Awesome. thank you.
tweeted the chart back to you. i cant figure out how to post a picture here.
Why did I have to have those blasted hot days when I was a kid working all day!
Thank you for showing how dishonest politicians and scientists work together to convert a few measurements of reality into scary headlines to frighten the public.
We need to know how to convert reliable information on reality* into
1. Faith in the benevolence of the powerful force that controls reality, and
2. Fortitude to throw off tyrannical rule by crooked politicians and pseudo-scientists.
*Reality: Humanity lives on a water-covered planet one AU (astronomical unit) away from the pulsar that
_ a.) Made all of the chemical elements from neutrons
_ b.) Birthed the solar system five billion years (5 Ga) ago
_ c.) Gravitationally retained waste products (H & He) to moderate gamma rays into
_ d.) Visible light to sustain the origin and evolution of life on Earth after 3.5 Ga ago
_ e.) Still controls and sustains every atom, life and world and in the solar system today
and the changing climate of every planet in a volume of space that has now expanded to be greater then the combined volumes of 10,000,000,000,000,000,000 Earth’s!
That truth can free humanity from tyranny, but it is almost impossible to communicate. Have spiritual leaders tried to communicate the same truth to humanity under the guise of various religious teachings? We know only a little, but it appears that spirituality and science are merging on the same truth.
Sadly, you are correct that there is nothing harder to communicate, than the truth.
” There are none so blind as one who will not see”. I am almost 74 yrs old, and have
seen people cling to a sweet lie, in the face of contrary proof, most of my life. Those
of us who think you just have to present the truth to win, are facing certain
disapointment. They will drag their sweet lie to their grave. Illusion trumps reality.
“Science advances one funeral at a time.”
-Max Planck
Thank you, Richard, for sage advice and gator69 for the quote from Max Planck. He was right.
I am about five years (5 yr) senior to Richard Clenney, and will – like my research mentor (the late Paul Kazuo Kuroda) – go to my grave clinging to same truth:
The birth of the world about five billion years ago was very much like the destruction of Hiroshima on 6 August 1945.
Neutron repulsion in the core of the Sun violently fissioned the star in a supernova event that birthed the solar system five billion years (5 Ga) ago, . . .
just as neutron repulsion in the core of uranium atoms fissioned the uranium atoms that vaporized Hiroshima on 6 Aug 1945.
Praise God for the cooler temps!
Children won’t know what hot days are.
Actual real scientists are aware of the change for a large part of the US, and that it does not show the “AGW signal”. It’s called “the warming hole” and is the subject of research.
More on this subject, please.
The states noted must be in the ‘warming hole’.
I put an rsq plot against the %>90F data from 1980 and co2 and came up with 0.0163 with a negative slope. Translation: there is a very, very small chance that there is a relationship between co2 and days in the midwest above 90F, and if that improbable connection exists, it is a negative correlation.
I would probably get a better relationship between the price of butter in Paris and kangaroo population in queensland.
“Only a few simulations exhibited the observed rapid rate of warming (cooling) during 1901–40 (1940–79).”
http://journals.ametsoc.org/doi/abs/10.1175/JCLI3848.1
You see? Actual real scientists are aware of the rapid warming, and then cooling, which was actually measured. Not the pseudoscience that tries to get rid of the two events. The wealth of data for the area means even with adjustments, there is no AGW warming observed, Why it’s such a mystery to the world is most likely politics, the bane of real science.
The US is the only large area with good contiguous data, so they assume it is an anomaly to their worthless models.
Yes, Steven, you figured out the game plan:
LIE, and if they catch you, tell more and bigger LIES!
Here are a few empirical facts uncovered by measurements during the first twelve years of my research career and then re-buried under additional consensus LIES:
1. 1960: The Earth and meteorites formed four to five billion years (4-5 Ga) ago when radioactive iodine-129 (I-129) and plutonium-244 (Pu-244) were still alive and decaying. e.g., almost immediately after these were produced by violent nuclear reactions in a supernova.
2. 1964: Solar-wind neon is systematically enriched in lighter mass isotopes from mass-fractionation in the Sun.
3. 1967: Iron meteorites formed as early as so-called primitive meteorites and trapped as much short-lived iodine-129.
4. 1971: The interior of the Earth still contains gaseous decay-products of 16-MY iodine-129 and 82-MY plutonium-244 from nucleosynthesis immediately before the solid grains formed that would eventually accumulate into planet Earth.
5. 1972-1975: Carbonaceous chondrites formed directly from poorly mixed supernova debris before:
_ a.) Elements from different layers of the supernova and
_ b.) Isotopes of the same element made in different regions of the supernova . . .
homogenized (mixed together).
One Point that needs to be answer by the agw fanatics..
Their claim: Co2 will destroy the planet; and its a greater threat than a nuclear iran.
Question: if co2 is worse than nukes; because it will end the world .. do we not have a moral obligation to destroy China and India?? As their co2 output is increasing exponentially, putting us onto a path of world wide destruction.
Whats a nuclear war, compared to increased Co2!!! Nothing … C02 is infinitely worse
And it would be over in less than 2 hours !