Messing With Texas

Government climate experts didn’t like the 120 year decline in Texas temperatures, so they simply reversed it.

TexasJan-MarTampering

They accomplished this reversal through a spectacular hockey stick of data tampering.

ScreenHunter_8350 Apr. 05 11.17

The climate refuses to cooperate with their $29 billion/year scam, so they simply alter the data to meet the needs of ongoing funding.

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Messing With Texas

  1. Menicholas says:

    “so they simply alter the data”
    Seems to be a lot of this going around.
    I am beginning to wonder if there are any locations at all that have an actual warming trend.
    I suspect perhaps not.
    And I suspect that it is mathematically impossible for the whole to have warmed when there is no single part that has warmed.

  2. sfx2020 says:

    You ever compare your plots with the NCDC ones?
    http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/temp-and-precip/divisional-comparison/

    I’ve found all kinds of things looking at their presentation of before and after.

    • It should be about the same. I’m using their data for the calculations.

      • sfx2020 says:

        There app makes it easy to plot the various regions, as well as each month, season, annual and even precipitation. The changes to precipitation records is really baffling.

        It also makes using the data for research about worthless at times.

  3. omanuel says:

    Thank you, Steven, for your keen analytical mind and courage.

    Here is the program for the 2006 Impending Oxygen Crisis and the (now deleted) prediction by Tom Ayers that the entire Sun will be entirely devoid of oxygen in 2015:

    http://web.archive.org/web/20060528095910/http://www.hao.ucar.edu/Public/events/colloquium_2006new.html

    The pulsar-centered Sun that birthed and controls every atom, live and planet in the solar system will be revealed if NASA and other federal research agencies reveal cyclic changes over a typical solar cycle in:

    1. The solar surface temperature
    2. The solar surface composition
    3. “Cosmic” and neutron fluxes in Earth’s upper atmosphere
    4. Changes in isotopic abundances in solar flares and eruptions

    Professor Stig Friberg and I reported some of this information at the Helio-seismology Conference, Big Bear Observatory in 2002: http://www.omatumr.com/abstracts/gong-2002.pdf

    Professors Barry Ninham, Stig Friberg and I also published information on implications of solar eruptions for Earth’s climate in 2002: http://www.springerlink.com/content/r2352635vv166363/

  4. SMS says:

    Is this a “Hayhoe” adjustment?

    “Hayhoe adjustment” adjustments made to existing temperature records to force a proof that is otherwise unproveable

    • gator69 says:

      The Driven Serfs</b?

      Hayhoe… Hayhoe…
      She’s off her meds you know…
      Hayhoe Hayhoe, Hayhoe Hayhoe
      Hayhoe… Hayhoe, Hayhoe Hayhoe…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *