If I had a son, he would like like Trayvon
Hands up, don’t shoot
Audit him, Lois
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “New computer modeling”
- Climate Destroying Shrimp
- What’s At Stake?
- Too Hot To Live
- What’s At Stake?
- “The world began to end on 12th May 2024”
- “Climate change is a myth”
- Racist Gas
- RFK Jr. Discusses The Green New Deal And Climate
- “world is on edge of climate abyss, UN warns”
- Ivy Echo Chamber
- Climate Homicide
- Much Ado About Nothing
- Homophobic Gas
- World Bank Expectations
- Trained Not To Learn
- Protecting Endangered Species
- Record Climate Cynicism
- Record Cynicism
- The Latest In Climate Science Rhetoric
- Climate Desperation
- Artificial Stupidity
- Climate Obsession
- The Climate Empire Strikes Back
- Climate Scam Parrots
Recent Comments
- arn on “New computer modeling”
- Disillusioned on Climate Destroying Shrimp
- arn on Climate Destroying Shrimp
- Gamecock on “New computer modeling”
- Billyjack on “New computer modeling”
- Disillusioned on Climate Destroying Shrimp
- Richard E Fritz on “Climate change is a myth”
- Richard E Fritz on “The world began to end on 12th May 2024”
- Richard E Fritz on What’s At Stake?
- Richard E Fritz on Too Hot To Live
Trayvon definitely acted like he was an Obama son, giving America the finger.
The first two got exactly what they deserved.
I wouldn’t mind seeing the third get what he deserves, too. It’s the complete opposite of the other two, of course.
If Obama wanted to help the country get out of this recession, he could have a discussion with Thomas Sowell on how our economy works. It’s obvious the president has no clue.
Obama is an idealogue who would never give the ideas of Thomas Sowell credence, not in a million years. And its questionable as to if the president has the best interests of the country in his heart.
“… he could have a discussion with Thomas Sowell on how our economy works.”
I would like to see any president (either party) listen to Dr. Sowell. It will never happen of course as laissez faire free market economics is not what the power mad want to listen to.
The classical liberals built western civilization. Read here what they believed in:
https://mises.org/library/what-classical-liberalism
To appreciate Dr. Sowell and reality in general, a President would have to admit that economics and human nature are more permanent structures than political spin.
Classical Liberalism would today be construed as something against which all current liberals might oppose. Valuing the Individual above the State is something anathema to modern Liberals and Democrats. Dr. Sowell on Liberalism: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ax_9AQuDbPY
That goes against progressivism, which is based on the notion an intellectual elite can shape human nature as desired, and thus attain utopia.
@Dave: Agreed. “Progressivism” is an irrelevant concept until or unless the goals, means, costs, alternatives, and tradeoffs of “progress” are defined in advance of actions. Without such transparency in advance, progressivism might mean anything from nothing at all to a Totalitarian State. Thus, “progress” without the defining aspects of “methods and results” is a scary concept. Hitler liked Progress. So did Stalin, Mao, Castro, and Mohammed. Ordinary people didn’t much like those things. At least 270 million of them who were sacrificed on the altar of progress. Me, I’m analytical and doubtful of intentions. Keep the larder full, the ammo dry and the mind sharp. Nothing has produced any net benefit upon the World since the formation of the US Constitution as a basis of governance. Many have tried, all have failed by historical and actual measure. The current crop are no different.
I’ve seen nothing of their ‘progress’ that doesn’t look, walk, and talk like regression.
Someone looking for a job in the White House.
https://youtu.be/LHt0Erp040Y
Dr. Carson was audited after his Prayer Breakfast Speech maybe 2012? He criticized obewon and was immediately audited.
Yes. “Carson says the Internal Revenue Service started looking into his real estate holdings following his comments against the White House at the National Prayer Breakfast in February. Carson says he had never had a problem with the tax-collecting agency until he spoke out against the president. Eventually, the IRS conducted a full audit against Carson and found no wrongdoing, he said.”
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/10/03/dr-ben-carson-says-irs-targeted-him-for-his-anti-obama-comments/
Of those monitored by the IRS, 83% were conservative. Of those audited by the IRS, 100% were conservative. Gee. What a coincidence. http://www.tpnn.com/2014/02/12/100-percent-of-501c4-groups-audited-by-the-obama-irs-were-conservative/
Nixon was impeached for the actions of his underlings that he knew nothing about. Obama has never been held accountable for the actions of his appointees. Must be that transparency everyone heard about before the elections.
Black Democrat vr. White, and rather non photogenic Republican, plain and simple. Nixon was no great catch. And truth be known, a good administrator generally that still would bow to the left and believed in growing the government. I have and had no Love for Nixon. But Watergate did not rise anywhere close to the very very high bar for “High Crimes and Misdemeanors” that the progressives have raised up over that past years.
Bingo. Yes, indeed. Comparatively, please see
Previously claimed as grounds : http://townhall.com/columnists/johnhawkins/2014/06/07/5-high-crimes-and-misdemeanors-for-which-obama-deserves-to-be-impeached-n1848801
The “True Comparitor” to Obama is “High Crimes and MisDemeanors”. Coulter is decisive and compelling in her flagellation. http://www.amazon.com/High-Crimes-Misdemeanors-Against-Clinton/dp/0895261138
Clinton was a serial rapist and sexual deviant. Obama is a malignant narcissist. Very much more dangerous for society, liberty, and world stability. The former was simply a trailer trash pimp. The latter is a sociopath and marxist deviant. Liberalism rarely gets better than Marx, but in Obama’s case, history shall judge him , and that, quite harshly.
Obama speaks against Fox News because AFAIK they’re the only news station that criticizes him. It’s also why he wants Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity off radio. And it’s why he wanted government control of the internet. He’s very thin skinned and can’t stand any one criticizing him. He truly is a narcissist.
Race has nothing to do with anything ‘progressives’ say. Black and white are deliberately set against each other by Obama, who campaigned as a healer of racial division. Instead, he threw gasoline on the flames.
Keep one thing in mind in order to understand the motivations of this Administration and its enablers:
The Left believes none of the things they lecture the rest of us about.
It’s known as ‘Fen’s Law’, and it applies to them across the board. Power is what they want, and all of their holier-than-thou hand wringing over race is nothing but a means to an end. They don’t believe one word of what they’re saying.