Atmospheric CO2 has been increasing, and atmospheric temperatures haven’t. The global warming scam is dead scientifically, and is now maintained 100% by corruption and perversion of science.
ESRL Global Monitoring Division – Global Greenhouse Gas Reference Network
Wood for Trees: Interactive Graphs
The scam is now very heavily dependent on fraudsters at NASA and NOAA tampering with surface data, to create the appearance of non-existent warming. The most disgusting and lowest form of scientific behavior.
If the planet was actually warming, sea ice would be disappearing – but it isn’t. Earth has the same amount of sea ice as it had 35 years ago.
Reblogged this on Climatism and commented:
Great post. Sums up the climate scam in 3 paragraphs. Nice.
Only government science has lead to ovens for cooking humans…
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51kwtjqVF-L._SY344_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg
They also silenced dissent.
Tweet!
Not Hitler, but Hitler’s twin in the USSR.
Yes Hitler. Quit trying to segue into your spam. The book is about Hiler’s use of scientists to pervert science. Maybe you should read it.
You may be right, gator69, but I believe it was Stalin that survived WWII and perverted western science to try to hide NEUTRON REPULSION in cores of
1. All atoms heavier than 150 amu
2. Some planets like Jupiter
3. Ordinary stars like the Sun
4. Galaxies like the Milky Way, and
5. The Universe expanding and filling interstellar space with hydrogen (H)
You may be right, gator69, but I believe it was Stalin that survived WWII and perverted western science to try to hide NEUTRON REPULSION in cores of the uranium and plutonium that destroyed Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Oliver, Slow down the spam fest. You hijack everyone’s comments with your spam-a-licious segues umpteen times per day. Try a new tune once in a while.
In fact, the theoretical nuclear physicists advising Hitler’s atomic bomb project, Dr. Carl von Weizsacker, may have been an agent of Stalin. Weizsacker’s nuclear binding energy equation obscures the source of energy that causes heavy atoms to fission – NEUTRON REPULSION – and exaggerates repulsive forces between protons.
Next time you want to comment about something related to your iron sun, count to ten, and then reconsider. Surely you have something else you can add to the discussion.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9mUZSUxCFCQ
Yes, enough is enough.
On topic in future please.
Its getting boring and annoying, and not winning too many to your ideas.
COUNTER-PRODUCTIVE would be the word I would use.
ps…. its well past the stage where most people just skip your posts, so even if you do have something to add to the discussion at hand, nobody will notice.
I’m with Andy on this. I like you, Oliver. You’re intelligent, and you’ve made some solid contributions on here. I even think you’re probably on to something with your solar arguments. But when I see more than a sentence or two from you, I find myself just skipping the whole thing, assuming I’ve read it a hundred times before. It doesn’t bother me any, or offend me. It just makes me more likely to jump to the next comment.
Perhaps a good compromise would be a single line description, and a link, at the end of each of your posts. Like a signature. It gets the message out to the infrequent readers, but it doesn’t encourage the regulars to skip over your posts.
Just my 2 cents.
“The most disgusting and lowest form of scientific behavior.”
I would say that it is the most disgusting and lowest form of behavior by those who claim to be doing science. I don’t think the fraudsters are engaged in “scientific behavior”. It is more of a con game or a cult thing — can’t decide which one.
~ Mark
Before we come to class and Range the Sciences, ’tis proper we should sift the merits of Knowledge, or clear it of the Disgrace brought upon it by Ignorance, wether disguised as (1.) the Zeal of the Divines, (2.) the Arrogance of Politicians, or (3.) the Errors of Men of Letters.
-Sir Francis Bacon, “Advancement of Learning”, 1605 (Father of the Scientific Method)
Mark,
The con game started when Stalin emerged victorious from WWII after a news blackout of events in Aug-Sept 1945 left Stalin in secret possession of
1. Japan’s atomic bomb plant at Konan, Korea, and
2. The American crew of a B29 bomber he held for negotiations to . . .
unite nations (UN) and national academies of science (NAS) into a giant, worldwide “Orwellian Ministry of Consensus Scientific (UN)Truths” on 24 Oct 1945.
The seas are warming up….never forget!
Where are the seas warming up, and by how much? Did you hit your head? We have covered this several times before.
An idiot, dolt, dullard or (archaically) mome is an intellectually disabled person, or someone who acts in a self-defeating or significantly counterproductive way. The similar terms moron, imbecile, and cretin have all gained specialized meanings in modern times. An idiot is said to be idiotic, and to suffer from idiocy. A dunce is an idiot who is specifically incapable of learning.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiot
Hey cf, do you remember before, when I told you that the greenhouse effect warms the atmosphere? Not the seas, the atmosphere? So why are you still here talking about the seas warming? I had a dog once who was untrainable. Worthless idiotic mutt, don’t tell me you are the same way.
He doesn’t need to tell anyone !
The simple flow diagrm, sun==> surface==>atmosphere==>space, is how it works. The GHE warms the surface first,not the atmosphre.
What?
Modelled at 0.003C per year or something like that, from massively dispersed irregular data.
So small they have to work in Joules.
TOTALLY INSIGNIFICANT.
I once left a comment at (I think it was…) Climate Progress, pointing out that the massive warming of 24 X 10^22 joules only worked out to be less than a tenth of a degree spread over a half century. Their response was that “there are always ways of making a really large number look small!”
That response indicates a level of anti-science which boggles the mind.
Yeah, since they are taking a really small amount and trying to make it look big.
Apparently they are compensating for something.