Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
- The Anti-Greta
- “a persistent concern”
Recent Comments
- Bob G on Back To The Future
- Mike Haseler (Scottish Sceptic) on Back To The Future
- Tel on Back To The Future
- arn on Back To The Future
- Walter on Joker And Midnight Toker
- Bob G on Back To The Future
- Disillusioned on Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Disillusioned on Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- conrad ziefle on Back To The Future
- Brodirt on Back To The Future
Sydney Had No Rain For Six Months In 1790
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.
Too many people cooking with wood burning stoves I presume.
Obviously a TOBS issue, if nobody had been observing precipitation values in 1790, this would not have been reported. Besides, people back then were stupid and did not know the difference between rain and sunshine. We just need a single tree in Siberia to really know what happened in Sydney 225 years ago.
Reblogged this on Climatism and commented:
I blame your 1790 Holden Commodore station wagon.