Little Change In Arctic Sea Ice Over The Past 45 Years

In 2009, experts told us that all of the thick multi-year ice is gone in the Arctic, and polar bears are doomed.

2016-07-26064834

Multiyear Arctic ice is effectively gone: expert | Reuters

Our top climate prophet said the Arctic would be ice-free by now, and Democrats worshiped him for saying it.

The Argus-Press – Jun 24, 2008

ScreenHunter_377 May. 12 13.16

The Argus-Press – Google News Archive Search

So what is happening in the actual Arctic?  Over the past nine years there has been a large expansion of thick multi-year ice across the Arctic, and climate alarmists can’t sail their boats through the Northeast Passage.

Arctic-Ice-July24-2007-2016

The coverage of multi-year ice is nearly identical to what it was in this 1971 National Geographic map.

ScreenHunter_11 Jul. 30 19.16

ARCTIC OCEAN

1971 was also the year NASA predicted a new ice age by the year 2020.

CRoWBirVAAAVf7M

U.S. Scientist Sees New Ice Age Coming

NASA understood that CO2 was not a threat to the climate, and that increasing CO2 had minimal effect on temperature.

2015-11-07-12-30-092015-11-08-05-03-14

rasool_schneider_1971.pdf

Government scientists show Arctic sea ice plummeting, because that is what they are paid to do.

monthly_ice_06_NH-350x270

They start their graphs right at the peak, and ignore the earlier data which wrecks their scam.

CIBhaFoVAAACBQb

If you thought that this scam had anything to do with science, well that was just an error on your part. Scientists have been pulling the same scam since before Bernie Sanders was born.

CnCwgn6VUAA_-Tp

15 Apr 1934, Page 33 – The Lincoln Star at Newspapers.com

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

20 Responses to Little Change In Arctic Sea Ice Over The Past 45 Years

  1. Pingback: Little Change In Arctic Sea Ice Over The Past 45 Years | world watch web

  2. Andy DC says:

    Yes, that is exactly what my meteorologist friend told me 40 years ago, before global warming became a huge scam and enormous political football. That adding CO2 beyond a certain point would have very little effect on temperature. Maybe I am not the world’s greatest scientist, but have been fortunate to have known some good ones.

    The 1979 cherry pick is also one of the key ingredients to the global warming scam. If we had started the charts during 1971 rather than 1979, there would be an entirely different impression.

  3. Steve Case says:

    Thanks for the (Rasool Schneider 1971) link.

    Dr. Stephen Schneider can’t defend himself, since he’s no longer among the living, but from time to time it’s instructive to review what a flip-flop bullshit artist he was.

  4. Andy says:

    Thickness of ice is still a very difficult thing to measure, at least compared to extent / area, and in the past either they are done accurately by pin pricks and miss a lot out or you do it over the entire area and it had large error margins.

    Getting better but I’ll stick to extent at the moment, even that has issues as we know from DMI last year ….

    Andy

  5. AndyG55 says:

    The AMO is turning downwards. This is probably the last chance for some 50-60 years of any trip of this sort.

    We are still very much at the “cold” end of the Holocene.

    • AndyG55 says:

      Oops…. I don’t know how that graph got attached..

      Oh well.. its interesting because it shows that the Arctic ice loss over the last 20-30 years has been nothing but the RECOVERY from the peak of the LIA, the coldest period in the whole last 10,000 years.

  6. Marc Libert says:

    Tony your 71 map actually looks pretty nice, does it exist somewhere in a better definition? I’d love to read all the little pieces of text on it. Thanks

  7. Waz Zup says:

    You guys are nutty, no wonder a guy like Trump can bamboozle you with bullshit.

  8. CheshireRed says:

    Another great post.

    Tony, could you recalibrate that Arctic ice ‘melt’ graph to start from the beginning of that low-point data – around 1974? It would show a completely different graph. (I realise this may be seen as cherry-picking but it would nicely illustrate how THEY have cherry-picked a high point for their own ends.)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *