I am absolutely certain that generations from now, we will be able to look back and tell our children that this was the moment when the rise of the oceans began to slow .
- Barack Obama June 3, 2008
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming! Please help with a gift by clicking the button below.
-
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Gordon Vigurs on Worse Than Predicted
- conrad ziefle on LA Times : A Free Press Via Censorship
- conrad ziefle on Extraordinary Claims
- Frank on Climate Certainty
- Gamecock on LA Times : A Free Press Via Censorship
Archives
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
Barack seems “absolutely certain” of a number of things that simply are not true.
http://www.snopes.com/politics/obama/50lies.asp
But wait, there’s more!
http://www.infowars.com/252-documented-examples-of-barack-obamas-lying-lawbreaking-corruption-cronyism-etc/
Those are NOT Topex, Jason etc
they are AGW “EXCEPTATION ADJUSTED” Topex and Jason.
The original data….
That’s missing 16 years worth of data, apparently.
Ah, I now want to show you what a difference 3 years made.
Notice how cycles around 238 were LOWER than around cycle 31.
Then look at what happens in the “new” graph
I’m gunna say it.. Wrong Graph !!!
:)
Its pretty ugly, but here is the 2000 version overlaid on the 2003
Adjustments, just when they needed to tell the “fairy tale”
Nice one.
I like the way old data always comes back to haunt them and hopefully throw them in jail.
AndyG55 says: August 29, 2016 at 5:47 am
Its pretty ugly, but here is the 2000 version overlaid on the 2003
Adjustments, just when they needed to tell the “fairy tale”
Yes indeed, great find. I’ve been posting similar stuff for some time now and it’s great to see that others are finding the same crap.
Here’s my first effort
http://oi59.tinypic.com/24e8482.jpg
from a few years ago.
A redo of the idea (below) shows the rate of sea level rise as a function of time. Each line on the graph is from a separate release from CU’s Sea Level Research Group. As you can see, over the last decade or so the rate has been steadily bumped up. And if you look carefully at the last red line, 2016_rel3, it looks like they are starting to lower the earlier values.
The New Jason3 satellite was launched in January 2016 and hasn’t come on line yet. But when it does I expect the data to be changed. That coupled with the latest paper from CU Is the detection of accelerated sea level rise imminent? Is going to be used to generate a whole heap of bullshit.
Well anyway, here’s that graph:
AndyG55 says: August 29, 2016 at 5:47 am
Its pretty ugly, but here is the 2000 version overlaid on the 2003
Adjustments, just when they needed to tell the “fairy tale”
Yes indeed, great find. I’ve been posting similar stuff for some time now and it’s great to see that others are finding the same crap.
A redo of the idea (below) shows the rate of sea level rise as a function of time. Each line on the graph is from a separate release from CU’s Sea Level Research Group. As you can see, over the last decade or so the rate has been steadily bumped up. And if you look carefully at the last red line, 2016_rel3, it looks like they are starting to lower the earlier values.
Here’s my first effort
http://oi59.tinypic.com/24e8482.jpg
from a few years ago.
The New Jason3 satellite was launched in January 2016 and hasn’t come on line yet. But when it does I expect the data to be changed. That coupled with the latest paper from CU Is the detection of accelerated sea level rise imminent? Is going to be used to generate a whole heap of bullshit.
Well anyway, here’s the latest:
For some stupid reason my post isn’t showing up.
Let’s see if I can post the graph first:
Here’s the text that was supposed to be with it:
AndyG55 says: August 29, 2016 at 5:47 am
Its pretty ugly, but here is the 2000 version overlaid on the 2003
Adjustments, just when they needed to tell the “fairy tale”
Yes indeed, great find. I’ve been posting similar stuff for some time now and it’s great to see that others are finding the same crap.
A redo of the idea (below) shows the rate of sea level rise as a function of time. Each line on the graph is from a separate release from CU’s Sea Level Research Group. As you can see, over the last decade or so the rate has been steadily bumped up. And if you look carefully at the last red line, 2016_rel3, it looks like they are starting to lower the earlier values.
Here’s my first effort
http://oi59.tinypic.com/24e8482.jpg
from a few years ago.
The New Jason3 satellite was launched in January 2016 and hasn’t come on line yet. But when it does I expect the data to be changed. That coupled with the latest paper from CU Is the detection of accelerated sea level rise imminent? Is going to be used to generate a whole heap of bullshit.
Well anyway, here’s the latest:
Can’t get the text to show up, Hmmmm I’ll remove all the HTML and slap it up here
AndyG55 said: August 29, 2016 at 5:47 am “Its pretty ugly, but here is the 2000 version overlaid on the 2003
Adjustments, just when they needed to tell the “fairy tale”
Yes indeed, great find. I’ve been posting similar stuff for some time now and it’s great to see that others are finding the same crap.
My latest (Above) shows the rate of sea level rise as a function of time. Each line on the graph is from a separate release from CU’s Sea Level Research Group. As you can see, over the last decade or so the rate has been steadily bumped up. And if you look carefully at the last red line, 2016_rel3, it looks like they are starting to lower the earlier values.
The New Jason3 satellite was launched in January 2016 and hasn’t come on line yet. But when it does I expect the data to be changed. That coupled with the latest paper from CU “Is the detection of accelerated sea level rise imminent?” is going to generate a whole heap of bullshit.