Clintons Never Change, Nor Do Their Supporters

When caught lying under oath, Clintons always attack the person who caught them doing it. They have been doing this for decades.


Page 9 – Detroit Free Press at

And when Clintons get caught abusing women, it is all goodness for their fans.


Nothing ever changes.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Clintons Never Change, Nor Do Their Supporters

  1. Steve Case says:

    I ran across this one earlier this morning:

    Hillary Clinton is an alcoholic
    Posted on October 29, 2016 by Dr. Eowyn
    The American Medical Association defines an “alcoholic” as someone who:

    Has a prolonged period of frequent, heavy alcohol use.
    Is unable to control drinking once it has begun.
    Has withdrawal symptoms when the individual stops using alcohol.
    Needs to use more and more alcohol to achieve the same effects.
    Has a variety of social and/or legal problems arising from alcohol use.

    By that definition, Hillary Clinton is an alcoholic.

    In an email to Hillary’s campaign chairman John Podesta on August 8, 2015, Director of Communications for Hillary’s campaign Jennifer Palmieri wrote, referring to Hillary:

    “I think you should call her and sober her up some.”

    On Feb. 23, 2015, Hillary’s spokesman Nick Merrill sent an email (presumably to Hillary’s campaign staff) with the subject: “HRC Clips” (news clips on Hillary Rodham Clinton). The news clips that day included an article by Benjamin Bell for ABC News titled, “One Thing That Might Surprise You About Hillary Clinton,” which Merrill reproduced in its entirety in his email.

    Bell’s article was an interview with New York Times national political reporter Amy Chozick, on whether Hillary Clinton would announce she’s running for the presidency. One of the questions Bell asked Chozick was: “Covering [Hillary] Clinton, what is one thing that has surprised you about her?”

    Chozick answered:

    “Hmm. She likes to drink. We were on the campaign trail in 2008 and the press thought she was just taking shots to pander to voters in Pennsylvania. Um, no.”

    According to the National Enquirer, “top staffers” of Hillary’s campaign told the Enquirer “they even began this year’s presidential campaign by secretly planning a stint in rehab for Hillary.” But any rehab therapy “quickly failed amid the pressures of the campaign” and “the effort of making a deal over an FBI probe into her e-mail scandal”.

    A source said, “The stress of her political career, the never-ending scandals and her worsening health plunged her into a life-threatening booze hell. She turned to drink to drown her fears. Hillary tries to hide her problem, like she lies about so many things.” A “close friend” of Hillary added, “Hillary has been drinking heavily for years to forget her miserable marriage to serial cheater Bill. She’s also hit the bottle to cope with other stress, as well as the boredom of flying all over the world when she was Secretary of State.”

    One “Hillary insider” told the Enquirer that Hillary “has blackouts and wakes up wondering where she is and what she has done” and that “She’s not fit to be President”.

  2. mat says:

    “If it ain’t broke…”
    So as long as the low info crowd buy’s it, why would they change…

  3. Andy Watson says:

    This was an interesting read

    That’s the problem with US President elections with the normal two candidates — what happens if both are not up to scratch?


    • tonyheller says:

      Your comments follow the typical patterns of many Hillary trolls.
      You aren’t fooling anyone.

    • RAH says:

      Andy Watson says:
      “That’s the problem with US President elections with the normal two candidates — what happens if both are not up to scratch?”

      That’s easy. Pick the one the old media doesn’t like. They are always for the most socialist, engrained establishment type. They were for Carter, Clinton, Gore, Kerry, Obama, and now probably the most corrupt of all Hillary

  4. oeman50 says:

    And what is HRC’s response to the Wikileaks revelations? “The Russians did it, it’s been confirmed.” Not even, “None of it’s true,” or, “These e-mails were never sent, they were made up.” No, just attack the source, like they have been doing all their political lives.

  5. Gail Combs says:

    Interesting (and frightening) video on what the DemonRats have been up to since 1965.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.