Build it and they will come.
In response to my graphs showing how the US has cooled over the last century, reader Jeff has been pointing out that it was cooler from 1871 to 1918.
No surprise there. In 1989, NOAA’s Tom Karl said most global warming occurred before 1919, and that Earth cooled from 1921 to 1979. Which is exactly what my graphs show.
07 Dec 1989, Page 14 – Santa Cruz Sentinel at Newspapers.com
A huge amount of warming was reported from 1918 to 1923.
Is the North Pole going to melt entirely? Are the Arctic regions warm- ing up, with the prospect of a great climatic change in that part of the world? Science is asking these questions.
Reports from fishermen, seal hunters, and explorers who sail the seas around Spitsbergen and the eastern Arctic all point to a radical change in climatic conditions, with hitherto unheard-of high temperatures on that part of the earth’s surface. Observations to that effect have covered the last five years during which the warmth has been steadily increasing.
- April 1923
07 Apr 1923 – NORTH POLE MELTING. – Trove
In 1974, NCAR showed that this warming continued until 1945, followed by sharp cooling until the 1970’s.
21 Jul 1974, 13 – The Des Moines Register at Newspapers.com
Good to see that we all agree, but not so good to see how Jeff is trying to mislead people by cherry-picking cold weather in the 19th century.
Lets see some stats from Alaska over the last decade
Why not North Russia?
Sure, Northern Russia as well. Anyone who can read a chart or look at a video knows that Russia, especially the north, is experiencing an incredible warming.
https://climate.nasa.gov
Click the link above (it should take you to another web page.) Then look on the bottom for the link to Global Temperature (second from left.) Play the short clip on the right by clicking he small triangle on the bottom left.
Now watch what happens to Northern Russia, especially near the end.
Let us know what conclusion you came to. It it matches what intelligent people noticed, then congratulations!
You fall for propaganda animations and manufactured GISS data.
No wonder you are so blindly ignorant
Russia warming rapidly.. ROFLMAO
http://metro.co.uk/2018/01/16/cold-russia-peoples-eyelashes-freezing-62c-7232410/
Great to see that HIGHLY BENEFICAL natural warming out of the ANOMALOUSLY COLD LIA though, isn’t it koon.
Move to Russia if you think its warm.
Grifters Handbook: If the mark notices you are lying, change the subject! Point to some vaguely unverifiable assertions in a foreign jurisdiction in a language alien to the subject at hand. Harrumpf loudly that THERE is the unvarnished truth and presto! The offending thermometer readings are overridden by reality control and doublethink, the emperor appears clad and the infidel disbelievers in coercive collectivism slink away in shame. Q.E.D.
I thought Scotty was against cherries. Don’t tell me he has been lying again!
Jeff must be so confused…
Why are the Left still running around with their hair on fire? AGW now stands for Al Gore’s Wrong!!!
So you moved from the arctic to alaska?
I’ll give you a hint about statistics there:
Just research some about polar bear population over the last decade.
You know ,those animals that were supposed to go extinct:)
Start the year the always the fearmongering
has started by using the same ice age fearporn rhetorics
“the potential consequences are scary as hell”
(it’s the first sentence of the first article of this topic and it’s from 1989).
If CO2 is the primary control knob of climate then why do some regions of the arctic have 13 foot thick ice today that had only 5 foot thick ice a year ago, 10 years ago and even 15 years ago and why do some regions that had 13 foot thick ice last year, 10 years ago and 15 years ago have only 5 feet today? Could it be that something besides CO2 is at play?
What are they REALLY trying to Control?
I was wondering that the trend was for one station within three months for max temperature.
Did you know that if you took all stations you would see a warming trend? It’s true! It’s what the adults call science.
“In response to my graphs showing how the US has cooled over the last century, reader Jeff has been pointing out that it was cooler from 1871 to 1918.”
I see. This one station IS the US. It represents the US. Whatever happens to this one stations is what is happening to the US, and I guess the entire globe.
“Government data shows U.S. in decade-long cooling”
Forbes magazine,june the 25th,2014.
(and after growing up maybe we’ll start to ask ourselves why the only
country out of 200+ in the world with a reliable track record is the only one that shows cooling.
Then we may to start ask ourselves why all the ‘modern’ shit
of good intentions
we have to suffer/enjoy and parrot(=hippies,religion of peace,AGW+rebranding into climate change,Countries to be destroyed because evil leader((and always turns out to be a lie) etc)
always starts in the USA.
Ask and ye shall receive!
https://realclimatescience.com/2018/05/ask-and-ye-shall-receive-2/
Ask for real science and you receive this:
http://berkeleyearth.lbl.gov/regions/united-states
Scott, do you even know where Tony is getting the data from?
Snicker…………………………………..
This is what happens when you don’t hide your source. Berkeleyearth, see link in previous post.
So you believe Tony is hiding his source! That explains it.
Your chart shows a more or less consistent warming for about 200 years.
At what point does the CO2 forcing come into effect?
Priceless.
Russia looking pretty cool to me.
Fossil Fuels are a cure, not a curse!
Do Al Gore and Obama fly by wind or solar?
Isn’t the thing Jeff points what you advise readers to watch out for in the arctic ice extent averages from noaa from 1979-present?
I am glad it doesn’t change your 1918-2018 results though.
Russia did it. Who knew.
See? Soviet propagandists tried since 1960 to use climate hobgoblins to frighten These States into surrendering into the Soviet Socialist Republics while fattening off of economic distortions caused by prohibition laws. That source was cut off with some rough handling and Altruria collapsed, but left behind meme pollution infecting the Dem party–which still views power plants the way prohibitionists view meth labs. But the real lesson here is that ex-scientists believe what they are paid to believe, and these remoras are so thick about the maw of the looter state that an honest appointee is required to pretend to believe thermometers are lying to pass the confirmation gauntlet.