Cold front bringing snow to central NSW moving in on ACT
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
-
Recent Posts
Archives
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
Recent Comments
Categories
Meta
Australia, when work is performed by real scientists.
Berzerkly Earth? “Real scientists?”. LOL! Thanks for the laugh!!!
Earth surface temperature had to come from the Aussie MET which is in it’s self a joke using 1 second temperatures as “data” and ignoring or adjusting away the old data!
Australia UAH this century…
Did you know that the hottest recorded temperature in Australia were around the 1900’s, koon
OR does you brain-numbed ignorance spread to basically everything !!
Berkley take all the crappiest data they can find and mal-adjust it using regional expectations
Probably the most unscientific way of doing anything.
A total FARCE, bought and paid for the far left socialists.
**In Australia where work i performed by “psuedo-scientists”**
There, corrected.
“Real scientists” who tamper with data.
Another cherry pick. And, we both now what happened with this issue. Well, I do, but now your readers are confused.
Seriously, lets see if you can come to a local school in my area, and we will have a debate. You bring your cherry picks and we can all have a good laugh. Yes, even high school students can recognize a con when they see it.
You praised Jeff for a cherry pick.
Please show us where you berate alarmists for their cherry picks.
Or are you just a frothing believer troll? Don’t bother answering again, we know.
I did not praise anyone for a cherry pick.
Jeff says:
May 10, 2018 at 7:49 pm
According to the National Weather Service, for the period 1871-1890 there were 116 days 95 degrees or hotter, for the period 1998-2017 there were 230 days 95 degrees or hotter. This is for Omaha/Valley NE.
Scott Koontz says:
May 11, 2018 at 12:36 am
Thanks. Nice to have a trusted source like the NWS so we can ignore these Monckton charts. There’s never a link to how the cherry pick was obtained.
So a big wet kiss for you cherry picking science denier buddy a Jeff, but only childish trolling for Tony et al.
You are an unfunny joke, Little Scotty.
You reply is to my post from BEST. You insist that the real scientists at BEST tampered with a station in Australia.
They did not. BEST has nothing to do with the recordings in Australia. You should be aware of that simple fact.
BEST simply takes the temperature data from the Australian MET office and uses it. If it is fraudulently recorded by the MET office it will be used just the same by BEST. Do you think BEST traveled to every weather station on earth to make sure they were recording the temperature honestly?
Global Warming is everywhere-
except those places we live and those places we check for data tampering and all other kinds of manipulation.
(and even when we prove some day that it got colder in all countries
there is this fantastic huge thing that covers half of planet earth called pacific-and the warming of the pacific will not only compensate for the cooling but also increase overall warming by 3-5 degrees(without icreasing vaporation or rainfall :)
(sorry for spoiling the official scientific AGWexcuse for the year 2027 :)
“except those places we live and those places we check for data tampering and all other kinds of manipulation.”
Do you know who Watts is and his work with temp stations? Did he point out the best stations in the US? Do you trust Watts and his work?
You clearly do not know Watts, or you are ignoring his criticisms of BEST, and cherry picking his positive comments. But then that is all you alarmists do, seek confirmation of your beliefs and attack anyone who tells the whole truth.
I see that you have no idea what happened between Wats and BEST.
Oh well. Another duped citizen.
God you are an idiot. Watts had been trying to fix BEST. Try reading his blog, and learn that his name has two t’s.
Still waiting on your mapping of all climate forcings. Can’t find it? LOL
“Watts had been trying to fix BEST.”
OK, so some guy with no degree is trying to “fix” an organization that worked with several computer scientists, a physicist and a climatologist?
Watts said he’d trust the results. Did he go back on his word? Why yes, he did!
And now so have you.
But maybe you learned something…
Tony, you are getting hammered here. I’m not sure how someone with a science degree can be so silly about cherry picks.
So you are insisting that Australia is not warming because it snowed in May in one city. In what science class did you learn that a single anecdote is enough information to apply to the entire issue?
Seriously Tony. Have you ever seen a science paper (you can choose geology if you want) that picks a single data point and extrapolates it for the entire topic? No, you have not, unless you were correcting papers for a failing student.
Just admit you are here to confuse the least educated people in the US. Why is the point? If I were you I’d lose sleep over this con.
Lol
Scott continues his streak of non-stop stupidity! Impressive.
“I’m starting to realize that you are just plain stupid, Scott. The date of the article I posted was 2003, fifteen years ago. The New York Times article you posted was from 2012.
What it shows is that Muller is a liar and the New York Times doesn’t do any actual journalism. Oh. And that you are an idiot.”
This is the real Goddard/Heller.
You are too stupid to realize that you are getting smashed here.
Where is the evidence that Tony’s charts are bad?
Waiting… Waiting,
Waiting
waiting…..,
Zzzz.
“What it shows is that Muller is a liar and the New York Times doesn’t do any actual journalism”
YES, and YES
Muller IS a liar, and a con-man
NYT stopped doing actual journalism ages ago, and now specialise in far-left advocacy
Now, have you got that empirical proof of atmospheric CO2 warming , anything, anywhere, anytime
Or are you going to keep ranting on like a tantrumised 5 year old !
That is a very impressive decline from 1940 to about 1970, from almost 79F to less than 74. Wa-hoo!
Sometimes when you’re a nail, everything looks like a hammer. ;-)
So why is Tony continuing to hammer? All he has to do is a few hours of research to understand why his simple program is wrong.
Here is the real Tony: “I’m starting to realize that you are just plain stupid, Scott. The date of the article I posted was 2003, fifteen years ago. The New York Times article you posted was from 2012.
What it shows is that Muller is a liar and the New York Times doesn’t do any actual journalism. Oh. And that you are an idiot.”
The Scott Koontz Challenge!
https://realclimatescience.com/2018/05/the-scott-koontz-challenge/
Enjoy your pounding.
Fantasizing again Scotty?
Gator is fantasizing again.
Oh look, Little Scotty is exactly the parrot I described yesterday.
Thanks for confirming my hypothesis.
“Enjoy your pounding.”
So dumb, that you don’t even realise the pounding you are getting.
Poor koon….. ZERO SCIENCE to support even the most basic meme of the AGW cult religion.
I think he realizes the pounding he’s taking.
After two days of bloviating about his brilliance and disparaging others (while whining about being attacked), the GISS/NOAA apologist has no more time to devote to this – he has a job to get to.
If he’s not moonlighting on the weekend at Taco Bell, maybe he’ll have “a few hours” to crack the flaws in the program and expose Tony for the fraud he clearly is. ;-P
Enjoying the pounding Little Scotty?
Tony, is the one who made the program in the first place you idiot!
It is up to critics like YOU to show what it is flawed. They whined about it, then backed away when they were challenged.
Nick Stokes and Stephen Mosher never did, maybe you be the “one” who did it?
MOTHER NATURE’S SENSE OF HUMOUR
The day after Australia’s opposition leader Bill Shorten promised that the Australian Labor Party will copy the failed South Australian state government experiment (which gave that Australian state the highest electricity prices in the world) and punish the entire nation with a 50% renewable energy target to ‘’take action on global warming’’ – Mother Nature delivers Canberra its coldest day for this early in the year since 1970, with a top temperature of just nine degrees forecast.
And it actually only made it to 7°
https://www.canberratimes.com.au/national/act/canberra-set-for-coldest-day-this-early-in-the-year-since-1970-20180510-p4zedr.html
It wasn’t particularly warm in Newy either.
Sudden cold snap.. brrrr
and a breeze that went straight through .
I was actually planning to head up to Canberra this weekend.. very glad I didn’t !
I much prefer it warmer.
https://www.northernstar.com.au/news/mini-ice-age-forecaster-predicts-coldest-winter-on/3401979/
Of the maximum temperature records for the 50 U.S. states, 36 were set prior to 1940.
http://ggweather.com/climate/extremes_us.htm
Does Australia have a similar situation?
Mostly set before 1910.. which BOM ignore, despite proper screens etc.
It is clear that Scott Koontz is another warmist loudmouth who doesn’t accept the challenge given to him to prove that’s charts are bad.
Since you have not once made a case, you have NOTHING to brag about.
He has been totally incapable of providing any empirical proof that atmospheric CO2 has any warming effect, either.
He shows little or no education in actual science.
He is basically just a useless loud-mouth anti-science TROLL !!