1934 – Worldwide Drought, Poles Melting, England To Drown, Freak Weather

NASA and NOAA had good reason to make the heat of 1934 disappear. The heat and drought was global, the Arctic was dissolving, England was going to drown, and the whole world had “freak weather.”  If people knew about that, it would wreck their global warming scam.

NASA 1999    NASA 2018

03 Feb 1934 – “WORLD HEATING UP.” – Trove

1934 and 1936 were unprecedented years for heat and drought in US. But the extreme weather wasn’t just in the US – it was global.  Click on the 1934 LA Times below to see it full sized.

30 Dec 1934, Page 13 – The Los Angeles Times at Newspapers.com

During 1934, the world experienced unprecedented drought and heat.


22 Jun 1934, Page 3 – Hartford Courant at Newspapers.com

04 Jun 1934 – WORLD DROUGHT – Trove

19 Jul 1934 – DROUGHT IN ENGLAND. – Trove

12 May 1934, 13 – The Guardian at Newspapers.com

19 Jan 1934, Page 10 – The Sydney Morning Herald at Newspapers.com

05 Jun 1934, Page 5 – The News-Chronicle at Newspapers.com

psi-193407.gif (690×488)

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

32 Responses to 1934 – Worldwide Drought, Poles Melting, England To Drown, Freak Weather

  1. kramer says:

    In 1934, CO2 levels were well below 350 PPM, the level claimed by the Rockefeller funded 350.org for a “safe climate”.

    Mr Heller’s excellent research results shows a very unsafe climate in 1934. What am I missing?

  2. Gator says:

    Unsafe at Any Level: The Designed-In Dangers of the Omnipotent Molecule

    • Johansen says:

      The unsafe Corvair, yes. Good ol’ Ralph Nader. The Corvair was a unique and weird looking car. Air-cooled, rear engine, 180 degree opposing 6-cyl if I remember. Aluminum block(?) Ahead of it’s time in may ways

        • Johansen says:

          Interesting, that one never took off with surf culture. Everyone seems to want an old VW van or Woody, or Ford Falcon or something.

      • Colorado Wellington says:

        With massive support from sensationalist media—and little help from Ford—Nader did his best to damage the public image of the most innovative, European-inspired American car of the era. It would be interesting to know in which direction the executives of the Big Three would have taken their companies if not for the success of Nader’s political campaign. Wealthy “Progressives” in the People’s Republic of Boulder could be driving Detroit cars instead of Audis, BMWs and Porches.

        Will the Corvair Kill You?

        In Defense of the Chevrolet Corsair

        1966 Chevrolet Corvair Yenko Stinger

        • Johansen says:

          Yep, the Big 3 had to go through another 15 years of producing garbage until quality finally improved in the mid-’80’s. My uncle was proud of his ’71 2002 Bimmer, which was miles above U.S. cars in terms of quality/innovation. In retrospect all it had was a modest 4-cyl carbureted fairly-gutless motor.
          General Motors had a fuel-injected! Corvette motor in the mid-60’s. They had to discontinue it because the G.M. Service Network didn’t know how it worked or how to service it!

  3. MikeW says:

    The US NASA, NOAA and DOE remain the world’s top climate change alarmists.
    http://www.cfact.org/2018/07/24/the-u-s-government-is-still-the-uns-top-climate-alarmist/
    It has become clear that the Trump administration has no intention of ending the Climate Change of Doom scam.

    • tonyheller says:

      You are completely wrong about that.

      • MikeW says:

        Tony, I’m willing to consider the evidence.
        1. What evidence is there that other organizations are more alarmist than NASA, NOAA and DOE?
        2. What evidence is there that NASA, NOAA and DOE are ending their part in the scam?

    • Gator says:

      Latest Gallup poll found Americans had zero concern for climate change.

      It’s dead Jim!

    • GW Smith says:

      The alarmist left is deeply embedded in all facets of our government, but Trump is not one of them. All signs point to him trying and succeeding to lead them away from the AGW morass.

      • MikeW says:

        GW, I agree that Trump claims to be a skeptic, but what signs are there that he is even trying to lead NASA, NOAA and DOE away from the AGW alarmist scam, let alone succeeding?

  4. garyh845 says:

    The one clipping above blares out, “NO FAULT OF FOX.”

    I didn’t know Fox News was around then.

    hehe

  5. Griff says:

    Interesting, but I think you need to look at the incidence of flood, severe storm and heatwave/drought in UK since the 80s.

    Undeniably a change in climate and more severe weather.

    • Josh says:

      GLOBULL WARMING.

    • Colorado Wellington says:

      Ms Griff, what’s the incidence of bed wetting since the 80s?

    • Gator says:

      Undeniably a change in climate and more severe weather.

      Me Griff, scientific study has undeniably shown zero increase in severe weather, so why are you a science denier?Are you just now figuring out that climates change? And why do you hate poor brown people?

    • tonyheller says:

      Unfortunately GHCN has very little pre-1950 daily temperature data outside of the US. So those sorts of comparison tend to be impossible.

    • dave1billion says:

      Griff, I didn’t know you were a creationist!!!

      Is it your theory that, around 1980, God/Allah/Kali created the world and all of us? It’s truly miraculous how he (or she) implanted in each of us a set of manufactured memories so that we’d think that the world had previously existed.

      The simultaneous creation of all physical historical records and a corresponding geological record was also a great touch!

      Now I can tell my daughter that I am indeed as old as dirt as she often likes to remind me.

    • sunsettommy says:

      Gee, Ed (griff) how comes you can’t post the evidence?

    • Robert Austin says:

      Griff,
      So the UK didn’t have severe weather prior to the Halcyon 1980’s which had a perfect climate? Your innuendo suggests that if Tony looked into the question, he might find more instances of severe weather in recent years vs the 80’s. Assuming more severe weather in the UK in recent years you are still looking at a short period of 30 to 40 years which is only a half cycle of the great ocean oscillations, namely, the PDO and the AMO. Roger Pielke, not one of your dastardly “climate deniers”, has found no statistically significant increase globally in severe weather events. Griff, you appear so want catastrophic man made climate change to be a fact that you read it in short term weather events.

  6. Josh says:

    See this pic below

  7. Josh says:

    A graph of UK rainfall when the Industrial revolution had not began:

  8. R. Shearer says:

    Climate scientist’s from NASA used to be just sloppy and incompetent as evidenced by the email exchange below from 2007 re: 1934 vs 1998 temperature anomalies.

    http://www.judicialwatch.org/files/documents/2010/783_NASA_docs-2.pdf

    • Josh says:

      Hansen’s tenure at NASA has led to the recruitment of many fraudsters. What were Reagan, Bush Sr. and Bush Jr. thinking?? Why not fire the father of this scam when it was apparent Hansen was making shit up like claiming USA temps were boiling hot when the 1999 graph showed 1934 clearly the warmest.

  9. Ulric Lyons says:

    2003, 1975-76, and 1934 heatwaves all occurred at the same type of heliocentric quadrupole configuration of Jupiter, Saturn, and Uranus.
    Look at the solar wind temperature during the last two events:
    https://snag.gy/d2v3aJ.jpg

  10. Ulric Lyons says:

    Extreme hot and cold events regularly occur at syzygies and quadratures of the four gas giants, with more extreme events involving 3-4 bodies. The logic of two body configurations of superior conjunctions and either quadrature, derived from correlations with many centuries of weather records, is as follows.

    Jupiter opposite Neptune = cold.
    Jupiter square Neptune = hot.
    Saturn opposite Neptune = hot.
    Saturn square Neptune = cold.
    Jupiter opposite Uranus = hot.
    Jupiter square Uranus = cold.
    Saturn opposite Uranus = cold.
    Saturn square Uranus = hot.
    Uranus opposite Neptune = hot.
    Uranus square Neptune = cold.
    Saturn opposite Jupiter = cold.
    Saturn square Jupiter = hot.

    According to these rules, the 1975-76 Jupiter opposite Uranus and both square to Saturn, is one hot opposition, and two hot quadratures. In 1934 Saturn was slightly off square, as it was in 2003, but is followed by Saturn opposite Neptune in the hot episodes of 1936 and 2006.

    The apparent logic dictates that 3 body peak hot or cold events have to occur on tee-squares.

    Mechanisms would involve the magnetic connections from the Sun to each body, and the solar equatorial quadrupole magnetic moment, which is ordered N S N S.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.