Temperatures of -20C near the North Pole are now red hot.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Fifteen Year Old Children In Australia Control The Weather
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
Recent Comments
- William on Fifteen Year Old Children In Australia Control The Weather
- Francis Barnett on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Francis Barnett on More Snow Is Less
- Gordon Vigurs on Fifteen Year Old Children In Australia Control The Weather
- Disillusioned on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Disillusioned on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Francis Barnett on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
- conrad ziefle on Mission Accomplished
As long as the temperature in the arctic and antarctic below freezing point are described as “hot” they will have a hard time describing temperatures above the freezing point.
Why won’t they tell us how many more kTons of ice and snow are melting at the current -17 C versus the average -27 C?
Are they seeing a lot of water pools?
I’m a bit miffed by the graph. The two lines are labeled: blue is reanalysis, i.e. bogus.
and the orange is “operational model”, i.e. bogus. So what are the measured temperatures in both cases? And let me decide what to think about those.
While you are a bit miffed by the graph I am totally miffed by the graphics.
Usually their used to be, even in the worst propaganda pictures , at least a bit of scientific pretending.
But in this case they went full extreme BS .
There is no more nuanced orange and yellow.
Only 2 extremes – red and blue.
And this is impossible to happen.
Another problem is that such extreme should cause some violent storms, which do not happen.
My guess is that yellow and orange have been cancelled as those colors do not have the psychological impact red has.