Peer-Reviewed Science On Twitter

While academia is spending billions of dollars of taxpayer money doing worthless science based on superstitions about CO2 and fake government temperature graphs, there is some actual science being done on Twitter.

“In 2023, the 3-year frequency of global major hurricanes [simple counts] was the lowest on record!”

“Amazing correlation with the SILSO sunspots”

I confirmed Andy’s observation

Sunspot Number | SIDC

About Tony Heller

Just having fun
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Peer-Reviewed Science On Twitter

  1. toorightmate says:

    Without having accompanying/endorsing statistics I know (from experience) that Northern Australia cyclones have decreased in frequency and intensity since the 1960s.
    Major resource developments and expansion took place in Northern Australia throughout the 1960s and 1970s and major cyclones were far more frequent and intense than they have been for the past couple of decades.
    Why do the researchers only go back to 1980?

  2. Richard E Fritz says:

    SEE Greta was right – AGAIN

  3. Disillusioned says:

    Interesting. I’d like to know how could greater sunspot yield be responsible for a lower frequency of hurricanes – and vice-versa – and how far back the uncanny correlation exists.

    • Disillusioned says:

      *how much further back…

    • D. Boss says:

      It could be related to Svensmark (spelling?) and how cosmic ray density/frequency affects cloud formation. Increased sunspot activity would tend to block cosmic rays from afar, thus less cloud formation.

      Or it could also be related to the sun’s magnetic field waxing and waning along with sunspot activity. While much of the stuff associated with Electroverse seems wacko, there is some truth that the huge magnetic and electric fields in the solar system must have appreciable terrestrial effects. Thunderstorms, which are the seeds of hurricanes could be amplified or attenuated if the ground to sky electric field strength is altered. After all at ground levels, normal Efield is 100V/m, but during a thunderstorm it can rise to 1,000V/m.

      There’s a lot of schist that so called science does not understand or even know about…

  4. Ulric Lyons says:

    Prior to those three sunspot cycles, they would have been in phase rather than anti-phase, as with the AMO versus sunspot cycles:

    https://www.woodfortrees.org/graph/esrl-amo/from:1880/mean:13/plot/sidc-ssn/from:1880/normalise

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *