Data going back to 1866.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Mission Accomplished
- Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- “Rapid Antarctic sea ice loss is causing severe storms”
- “pushing nature past its limits”
- Compassion For Terrorists
- Fifteen Days To Slow The Spread
- Maldives Underwater By 2050
- Woke Grok
- Grok Explains Gender
- Humans Like Warmer Climates
- Homophobic Greenhouse Gases
- Grok Explains The Effects Of CO2
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Red Hot Australia
- EPA : 17.5 Degrees Warming By 2050
- “Winter temperatures colder than last ice age
- Big Oil Saved The Whales
- Guardian 100% Inheritance Tax
- Kerry, Blinken, Hillary And Jefferson
- “Climate Change Indicators: Heat Waves”
- Combating Bad Weather With Green Energy
- Flooding Mar-a-Lago
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2020
- Colorless, Odorless CO2
Recent Comments
- Timo, not that one! on Record Sea Ice Caused By Global Warming
- Bill on Ice-Free Arctic By 2027
- Gamecock on “pushing nature past its limits”
- Gamecock on “pushing nature past its limits”
- William on Mission Accomplished
- Gordon Vigurs on Mission Accomplished
- Disillusioned on Mission Accomplished
- Bob G on Mission Accomplished
- James Snook on Both High And Low Sea Ice Extent Caused By Global Warming
- czechlist on Mission Accomplished
Correlation between lunatic NSA mass spying and the massive loss of orders of American IT industry and defense industry, although graph is still underway.
http://freebeacon.com/boeing-loses-4-5b-contract-with-brazil-nsa-leaks-cited/#
This country is run into the ground by the current clique of idiots in charge and theur clueless helpers.
unrelated, but you may be interested in this about areans and wind turbines.:
http://news.nationalpost.com/2014/01/16/p-e-i-arenas-say-their-new-wind-turbines-an-expensive-burden-want-them-removed/
John M Reynolds
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TGbfyPzcLo
No correlation at all. Interesting.
Old Jedi Mind Trick
2/3 of readings above 120 spots have positive temperature anomalies.
2/3 of readings below 100 spots have negative temperature anomalies.
Odds of that being a coincidence are close to zero.
Might be so. Still think correlation is much weaker than expected. Never seen that plot before, by the way.
I wonder if the unadjusted numbers do any better
I’d be curious what the relationship is when you “lag” the temperature by a few years. That is, how does the data look when you compare sunspot count in Year X with temperature in Year X + Y?