Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
- “Earlier Than Usual”
- Perfect Correlation
- Elon’s Hockey Stick
- Latest Climate News
- “Climate dread is everywhere”
- “The Atmosphere Is ‘Thirstier.’”
- Skynet Becomes Self Aware
- “We Have To Vote For It So That You Can See What’s In It”
- Diversity Is Our Strength
- “even within the lifetime of our children”
- 60 Years Of Progress in London
Recent Comments
- conrad ziefle on Back To The Future
- Francis Barnett on Back To The Future
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Crashex on Time Of Observation Bias
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Mike on Climate Scamming For Profit
- conrad ziefle on Time Of Observation Bias
- Francis Barnett on Climate Scamming For Profit
- Bob G on Time Of Observation Bias
Steve,
I’d be very interested if you would turn your attention to the oldest continuous temperature record in the world – the CET. The lastest version looks VERY different from some of the graphs which I have seen from around the year 2000, or so:
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadcet/
Compare the latest version above to this one:
http://climatereason.com/LittleIceAgeThermometers/CentralEngland_UK.html
Where did that come from?
Clicking thru Anto’s 2nd link finds a link to Prof Ole Humlum:
http://climatereason.com/UHI/
and the link for the data from Hadley Center:
http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcet/data/download.html
The second one? Ole Humlum, I believe. Hadley changed from reporting monthly means to daily means a little while ago. That allowed them to say the pre-1772 data was not available/unreliable. However, it has also changed the slope of the increase from almost flat to somewhat hockey-stick shaped.
Their UHI adjustments are mere lipservice, as you’d expect. They apply -0.1C to maxima and -0.2C to minima.
http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcet/ParkerHorton_CET_IJOC_2005.pdf
Steven, Auto is referring to the DOCTORED, computer changeling data from the corrupt Met Office in England that has miscalled the weather repeatedly and said children would have no idea what snow is.
It is worse than NOAA and NASA data tampering, as you have proven in the past.
The second graph is the raw data with not computer changes, thanks, Auto!