Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- New Video : Analyzing Oil And Gas
- Is Antarctica Melting?
- High Speed Analysis And Visualization
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Fake News Update
- Growth Of Antarctic Sea Ice
- 65 Years Of Progress!
- El Nino To The Rescue?
- Worst March Drought On Record
- ChartGL Process Control Demo
- The Biggest Money Laundering Scam
- Drought In The Headwaters Of Lake Powell
- Unrealistic Expectations Of Water Availability
- Did Bill Gates Do This?
- Worst March Drought On Record In The US
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
Recent Comments
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Crispin Pemberton-Pigott on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- william on 65 Years Of Progress!
- arn on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Gordon Vigurs on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Bob G on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
- Robertvd on One Atomic Bomb Per Hour
Steve,
I’d be very interested if you would turn your attention to the oldest continuous temperature record in the world – the CET. The lastest version looks VERY different from some of the graphs which I have seen from around the year 2000, or so:
http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/hadobs/hadcet/
Compare the latest version above to this one:
http://climatereason.com/LittleIceAgeThermometers/CentralEngland_UK.html
Where did that come from?
Clicking thru Anto’s 2nd link finds a link to Prof Ole Humlum:
http://climatereason.com/UHI/
and the link for the data from Hadley Center:
http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcet/data/download.html
The second one? Ole Humlum, I believe. Hadley changed from reporting monthly means to daily means a little while ago. That allowed them to say the pre-1772 data was not available/unreliable. However, it has also changed the slope of the increase from almost flat to somewhat hockey-stick shaped.
Their UHI adjustments are mere lipservice, as you’d expect. They apply -0.1C to maxima and -0.2C to minima.
http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcet/ParkerHorton_CET_IJOC_2005.pdf
Steven, Auto is referring to the DOCTORED, computer changeling data from the corrupt Met Office in England that has miscalled the weather repeatedly and said children would have no idea what snow is.
It is worse than NOAA and NASA data tampering, as you have proven in the past.
The second graph is the raw data with not computer changes, thanks, Auto!