Tide gauges show about 8 mm since that prediction, so only 24,992 left to go.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Science Magazine Explains Trump Supporters
- Obliterating Bill Gates
- Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- The End Of Everything
- Harris To Win In A Blowout
- Election Results
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
Recent Comments
- Bruce of Newcastle on Scientific American Editor In Chief Speaks Out
- arn on Obliterating Bill Gates
- oeman50 on Harris To Win In A Blowout
- conrad ziefle on The End Of Everything
- arn on The End Of Everything
- conrad ziefle on The End Of Everything
- conrad ziefle on The End Of Everything
- LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks on Election Results
- LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks on Election Results
- LOL@Klimate Katastrophe Kooks on Election Results
Thanks, Steven, for your continuing effort to remind us of the discrepancy between government predictions and reality.
Unfortunately, the supply of material is endless but the response is always the same – SILENCE !
To the discerning ear, that response speaks volumes of the tyrannical one-world government that uses science as a propaganda tool to stay in power.
The unison in response of government scientists worldwide might be explained by a document adopted in 1972, the year Nixon announced the end of the Apollo program:
http://habitat.igc.org/agenda21/index.htm
This is why Al Gore bought an oceanfront home.
And sold all his green energy stock.
And Scientific American says methane has a global warming potential 86 times that of carbon dioxide.
Methane has so many organisms that feed on it and so many ways it can oxidize that it does not hang around. To have a surge in methane would take a cataclysmic event, one that indeed seems to have happened in the geologic past, where all the Arctic methane clathrates go through a shock dissociation. Such an event had a several degree rise in earth’s temperature until the methane was oxidized (a few years for such a big event). To prevent this from happening I suggest we mine the Arctic methane and use it for fuel.
Will, could, may
You are right. Too many people are saying things about climate without having a clue of what climate is. And Al Gore was, at that time, the loudest of them all. Of course, he was a politician trying to gather more votes, but he doesn’t realize how dangerous that is. Then, I have a problem with the “predictions” made by some governmental officials, who are trying to influence the public in order to see their economical and political interests fulfilled.
Back in 1946, the bay side house we spent summers in, in Australia, the king tides used to cover the flat lawn by about an inch and run into the well if we didn’t keep a levy bank around it. The lawn and well are still as they were in 1946. Guess where these highest astronomical tides come to now in this tectonically very stable area?
After several recent years of checking, about 6 inches to a foot lower.
Reblogged this on Globalcooler's Weblog.
Whoever wrote this is just a troll. Futurists don’t know anything, these predictions are all just a stupid hoax made by a bunch of brainless morons.