The Trend Is A “Clear, Consistent And Incontrovertible” Increase In A Few Fraudsters Ramping Up Their Lies About The Climate

9 Responses to The Trend Is A “Clear, Consistent And Incontrovertible” Increase In A Few Fraudsters Ramping Up Their Lies About The Climate

1. omanuel says:

   January 25, 2015 at 1:20 pm

   For seventy years (1945 – 2015), world leaders used federal research grant funds to guide government science toward the goals of UN’s Agenda 21.

   This unethical practice was invisible until the goals of UN Agenda 21 were finally published in 1972.

   Reply
2. Gail Combs says:

   January 25, 2015 at 2:17 pm

   If we are lucky Washington DC will get buried under five feet of ‘Global Warming’ next week as Buffalo NY did in November.

   Reply
3. Steve Case says:

   January 25, 2015 at 2:56 pm

   In order for the IPCC’s projections/a> to come true rate of temperature rise needs to dramatically accelerate. It’s not.

   If you take the last 30 years of data from GISTEMP, You will find that from 1985 to 2000 the rate of temperature rise was 0.2 deg/decade and from 2000 to 2015 the rate has been .1 deg/decade. That works out to a negative acceleration of minus -0.01deg/decade².

   Reply
   • AndyG55 says:

     January 25, 2015 at 10:32 pm

     Don’t worry Steve, Gavin is doing his best to accelerate the non-warming. !

     http://woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:2013/plot/rss/from:2013/plot/hadcrut4gl/from:2013/trend/plot/rss/from:2013/trend/plot/uah/from:2013/plot/uah/from:2013/trend/plot/gistemp/from:2013/plot/gistemp/from:2013/trend

     Reply
4. Steve Case says:

   January 25, 2015 at 2:58 pm

   Well, the link works but it should have looked like this:
   IPCC’s projections

   Reply
   • QV says:

     January 25, 2015 at 7:01 pm

     It’s a pity the chart doesn’t include the lowest projection of all – the “commitment”, which assumed zero growth in greenhouse gasses. The most accurate projection so far.

     Reply
5. DakotaKid says:

   January 25, 2015 at 3:19 pm

   If you would put the error bars (or grey area) you can show that the data are really so noisy that no conclusions can be drawn.

   Reply
   • Steve Case says:

     January 25, 2015 at 4:20 pm

     I can draw the conclusion that there isn’t any acceleration sufficient enough to result in the ridiculous IPCC projections. Click on my link

     Reply
6. BallBounces says:

   January 25, 2015 at 11:38 pm

   They should at least refer to them as tamperatures, not temperatures.

   Reply