Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- “falsely labeling”
- Vote For Change By Electing The Incumbent
- Protesting Too Much Snow
- Glaciers Vs. The Hockey Stick
- CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- IPCC : Himalayan Glaciers Gone By 2035
- Deadly Cyclones And Arctic Sea Ice
- What About The Middle Part?
- “filled with racist remarks”
- Defacing Art Can Prevent Floods
- The Worst Disaster Year In History
- Harris Wins Pennsylvania
- “politicians & shills bankrolled by the fossil fuel industry”
- UN : CO2 Killing Babies
- Patriotic Clapper Misspoke
- New York Times Headlines
- Settled Science At The New York Times
- “Teasing Out” Junk Science
- Moving From 0% to 100% In Six Years
- “Only 3.4% of Journalists Are Republican”
- “Something we are doing is clearly not working”
- October 26, 1921
- Hillary To Defeat Trump By Double Digits
- Ivy league Provost Calls For Assassination
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- arn on “falsely labeling”
- Disillusioned on “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- Greg in NZ on “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- Greg in NZ on “falsely labeling”
- Gordon Vigurs on “Glaciers, Icebergs Melt As World Gets Warmer”
- Disillusioned on CNN : Unvaccinated Should Not Be Allowed To Leave Their Homes
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- Disillusioned on “falsely labeling”
- stewartpid on “falsely labeling”
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
You should learn not to laugh at your own stuff… It’s like a fake laugh track… ROFLMAO!!!!!!
see what I mean… 😮
But Mat, how could Tony not laugh when the guy steps in a huge pile of steaming BS and does a pratfall face first into it?
Not sure if sarcasm or you’re actually confused.
besides being certifiably mentally ill, most libtards are tone deaf as well
Oh, piffle.
Nobody beats Bill Nye, nobody!
Here’s The Champ at 3:45:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sm05Mcah0i8
Any questions?
Didn’t Hitler win a Nobel Prize almost?
IS are front runners for the next Peace Prize…
If Le Duc Tho and Yasser Arafat could win the Peace Prize, why not IS?
lol did you hear he said it’s unpatriotic if you don’t agree 100% with any science? http://query.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.html?res=9A0DEED81F3EE633A25750C2A96E9C946394D6CF
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Nobel_Peace_Prize
CW, that clip was certainly educational. I’ve always suspected Nye was a Chaucerian fraud, but this is definitive proof. He actually identified the Nobel Peace Prize as “a scientific prize for making a discovery!” He also correctly notes that, in laymen’s terms, older people are harder to brainwash, hence the intense focus on educating the young.
Bill Nye is the champion spokesman for anti-science. How?
Ninety-Seven percent (97%) of Nobel Prize winners, NAS, RS and UN IPCC members agree with:
1. The Standard Climate Models
2. The Standard Nuclear Model
3. The Standard Solar Model
Zero percent (0%) of the above will openly address nine pages of precise data and observations that FALSIFY* these consensus models.
That is the root of the problem.
*See: “Solar energy,” Adv. Astronomy submitted for on-line review, 6 JAN 2015):
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Solar_Energy_For_Review.pdf
A Nobel Prize for the UN’s IPCC is as impressive as lipstick on a pig!
Ranks right up there with Yassar’s.
He is a dupe!
The Nobel prize that the IPCC was awarded was a ‘Nobel Peace Prize’. This is not a scientific prize.
We say chump not champ.
“The main thing is, … They got a scientific prize…” FAIL! FAIL! FAIL! FAIL! FAIL!
They got the Nobel PEACE Prize.
Other recipients of this ‘scientific prize’:
Al Gore (2007) shared it with the IPCC.
Yasser Arafat (1994)
United Nations (2001)
Jimmy Carter (2002)
Barack Obama (2009)
European Union (2012)
A lesson on Twitter please.
There is no context, do you read from the bottom up, like an email thread?
Top to bottom. Twitter can be very confusing.
The indications “45m”, “2m” and “6s” are the amount of time since the tweets. That is, Tony captured the screen image when it had been 45 minutes since the Moore tweet, 2 minutes since the Reid tweet, and 6 seconds since the Goddard tweet.
The larger context is here.
https://twitter.com/mwsreid/status/563841786112913408
Thanks!
Rachel Madcow “interviewing” Bill Nye! Kind of like the having a flat tire on the George Washington Bridge during rush hour. Like the dentist pulling the wrong tooth without anesthetic. OR one can just laugh all about it because neither one has a thing to do with seeking the truth and both think they actually influence people to change their mind. If I had to provide examples of people that should not be allowed to breed, both would be in the dossier.
It’s not just Rachel Maddow and dozens of MSNBC viewers, rah. Bill Nye also has a significant following among skeptical scientists and skeptical science aficionados who don’t have time for television because of science.
One Conrad Christian, a Huffington Post “Top Commenter” from Los Angeles says this about Bill Nye:
It was this special event in the Beckman Auditorium and it was sold out:
I did not find anything about Conrad Christian’s breeding strategy or his hopes about a possible contribution to the evolution of our species but he seems fascinated by the whole thing.
How can we forget this? [youtube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cesYjHSY–w?feature=player_detailpage&w=640&h=360%5D
“Preamble
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”
Michael Shermer got started debunking stories of UFOs and “paranormal” events (fish in a barrel is the image that occurs to me). Based on this he calls his magazine the Skeptic and formed the Skeptics Society. His definition of skepticism seems to be uncritical belief in whatever is politically acceptable.
Thanks, Beale, I did not know that. It seems that Shermer perfected his method on some of the toughest problems of mankind.
I’m pretty sure Rachel isn’t planning in doing a lot of breeding.
Yep, but on the off chance. There is, after all, artificial insemination.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2015/02/05/inconvenient-study-seafloor-volcano-pulses-may-alter-climate-models-may-be-wrong/
http://gerlach1991.geologist-1011.mobi/
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2011EO240001/abstract
Stalin’s Lock-Step Consensus
Ninety-Seven percent (97%) of Nobel Prize winners, NAS, RS and UN IPCC members agree with:
1. The Standard Climate Models
2. The Standard Nuclear Model
3. The Standard Solar Model
Zero percent (0%) of the above will openly address nine pages of precise data and observations that FALSIFY* these consensus models.
That is the root of the problem.
*See: “Solar energy,” Adv. Astronomy submitted for on-line review, 6 JAN 2015):
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Solar_Energy_For_Review.pdf
THESE GLOBAL WARMING people really believe they are right . It is going to be a long time before they wake up. Sincere ignorance is what martin luther king called it.
They would willingly debate the science, is they really believed they were right.
Correct Oliver,
Only those who know they do not have a scientific leg to stand on refuse to debate. After all the entire Scientific Method is all about looking at ALL the data formulating an idea/hypothesis and then trying to tear that hypothesis apart by making predictions based on the hypothesis and seeing if those predictions are on target.
“No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.” – Albert Einstein
That is why we use the word ‘theory’ There is no such animal as ‘Settled Science’ only the science as we know it today. And anyone who has been involved in science for any length of time knows it changes. Just ask the biologists who earned a degree in the 1960s/early 1970s about Taxonomy then and now.
That will give Bill Nye an opening “Tax the Economy” …..
Sorry. That’s bad……
Darn it, now I have to clean my morning tea off my monitor and key board.
Unfortunately that is about the level of Bill Nye’s scientific knowledge…
They are desperately trying to avoid the common conclusion of real science and theology regarding The Creator & Sustainer of the World, Reality, Truth, God, Spirit etc.
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Solar_Energy_For_Review.pdf
Read Patrick Moores book “Confessions Of A Greenpeace Dropout” if you haven’t already. Good stuff…