I know the skeptics under attack – Marc Morano, Joe Bast, Roy Spencer, Willie Soon, etc.
These are really good people trying to do the right thing. They are under attack by the very scum of the earth, exactly because they do the right thing.
History has repeated this story over and over again. Easily manipulated useful idiots always fall in line behind the scumbags, because scumbags are willing to lie over and over again, and useful idiots are too foolish to know the difference.
Here, here!
Yes, they are good people. They won the AGW debate – not because of political power – but because a benevolent Higher Power flipped the switch on solar cycle #24.
I totally agree and just hope to live through this depressing time, long enough to see the “good people” totally vindicated. Having always lived in very warm parts of our once thriving country, I don’t handle cold well; but I do believe that this solar cycle may freeze the Thames again and us as well. I have a home that can keep me warm (at a price!) but surely feel sorry for those less fortunate. It will be more and more difficult for the gullible and ignorant to ignore the actual weather!
I agree completely! That is why we must try to restore society’s contact with reality (truth, God).
I agree about the “truth” bit. Let’s leave religion out of it. Please.
Due to changes made to structures on the Thames river since the early 1800s, it is now unlikely to freeze completely, even if there is another ‘little ice age’. Before the 1800’s the river was wider and slower, and impeded by the Old London Bridge. The bridge was demolished in 1831/1832 and replaced with a new bridge with wider arches, allowing the tide to flow more freely; and the river was embanked in stages during the 19th century, all of which made the river less likely to freeze completely. .. Also, there are 45 locks on the river, each with one or more adjacent weirs. It is conceivable that the locks could be opened to *increase the flow if there was ever a risk of the river freezing. (Of course, ice is less likely to form on water that is flowing quite quickly.)
They won the AGW debate? I think you are optimistic in the extreme. Most people believe in global warming these days and I would say its on an upswing while skepticism among the public is declining. After the skeptics are shut up AGW will become fact.
AGW skeptics won the debate, thanks to a little help from the Power that made solar sunspot activity in the current solar cycle #24 the lowest on record since accurate record keeping started in 1750!
What a coincidence.
For more information, see the links posted below:
No! No matter the result of the debate FACTS concerning the climate will be what mother nature does, not what politicians and their bought and paid for “scientists” declare it to be.
Actually If Mother Nature does what I think she will, CAGW is going to be a really hard sell as the east coast and the Midwest get hit again and again with winters like the last two.
We are at what is supposed to be the peak of Solar cycle 24. Today, yesterday and the day before the sun was spotless. The F10.7 flux is running between 120 and 130 and declining. Cycle 25 is expected to be even weaker than cycle 24 so going forward we will probably see more meandering jets and polar vortexes just like the last couple of winters.
Cycle 22, 23 and 24 F10.7 flux
http://legacy-www.swpc.noaa.gov/forecast_verification/Assets/F10/F10ObsPlot.html
Jo-Nova’s Hubby, Dr Evans just recently developed a Notch-Delay Solar Theory that predicts a major drop in temperatures.
http://admin.americanthinker.com/images/bucket/2014-06/192605_5_.png
From an Article in American thinker: A Cold Dawn Coming
Also Joe Bastardi seems to think we are seeing the waning stages of the warm AMO.
So as the North Atlantic cools the water is less warm and therefore less melting Arctic sea ice. Of course it was a storm in 2007 that flushed the ice out of the Arctic basin that caused the major loss of Arctic ice.
Skeptics won the scientific debate. That is why ClimAstrologists refuse to debate skeptics in public. Lord Monckton creamed them in a debate at a UK University many years ago and that was the last of the open debates. Now they depend on name calling and saying they will not debate because the science is settled.
However since the Banksters are salivating at the thought of a Carbon Market and J.P. Morgan owns most of the USA MSM, the Climate conartists will likely win the Propaganda war.
Now with women like you around Gail. Don’t know if you’ve heard this before. Truck driver in Texas one day calling dispatch when he witnesses an accident and this is what transpired: http://zanylol.com/accident.html
Is there an available transcript of that debate.
CHAOS and FEAR in AUG-SEPT 1945 frightened other “Good People“ into
1. Forming the UN in OCT 1945, and
2. Forbidding public knowledge of the energy that had destroyed Hiroshima:
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/CHAOS_and_FEAR.pdf
Those “Good People” may not have intended to isolate society from the reality (truth, God) of creation, but that is exactly what happened!
https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/10640850/Sequel.pdf or:
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273132711_Sequel_to_Climategate?showFulltext=1&linkId=54f8a2ba0cf210398e96c66f
The scumbags have all the money and power, so of course the sheep will follow. The only thing we have is integrity and truth, something sheep just do not get.
and wisdom from ancient teachings,
“Truth is victorious,
never untruth.”
– Upanishads
http://abovethelaw.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/thumbs-up-300×199.jpg
http://crotchgroin.info/galleries/62_thumbs/goatsmile.jpg
Most of the useful idiots are not innocent followers. Most of them are scumbags themselves.
I wouldn’t go that far. I know of very few AGW supporters who are actually scumbags. Brainwashed, double-thinking sheep who don’t stop to use their critical faculties but not actually evil per se.
It seems I just made the same argument here:
https://stevengoddard.wordpress.com/2015/03/07/the-next-target-of-the-religion-of-peace/#comment-498763
Willing Accomplices.
yes they are.
Steve, I noted you got this. and my curiosity bump went to work.
Blurbs from the search engines:
PRODUCER. Hope Forpeace. [email protected]. Editor. Dan Anton. Dan @AKproductions.tv. Webmaster. John Feeney. [email protected].
Honest journalism, not molded by profit margins, is the only tool we have to address this breakdown. It’s the backbone of a strong democracy. To paraphrase Eisenhower, only Alert and Knowledgeable citizens can compel the proper meshing of the interests of American Corporations with the best …
Looking at Hope Forpeace:
https://www.youtube.com/user/HopeForPeaceNow
OH, and this is a real goody. Seems Hope is connected to Weepy Bill.
Hope Forpeace —
http://www.350bayarea.org/17361
About 350 bay area org.
Looks like you have ARRIVED! snicker.
Also before anyone gives any type of interview they need to read/watch this.
http://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com/video-and-smear-articles.html
Rosa is one smart lady.
Thanks for the detective work.
I was in the Bay Area in 1962-64 and suspect that a deep sense of guilt and good intentions have blocked good reasoning.
The Good People have a big job ahead of them. The belief in devastating global warming is so entrenched, that many people simply repeat by rote rather than think. Examples of this are from the city council of Ft. Collins, Colorado, where the decision has been made to cut CO2 emissions by 80% by 2030. Some comments:
“Implementing the plan would cost an estimated $600 million by 2020, although savings to the community, such as lower energy bills, could total about $300 million during the same time, Smith said. By 2050, the plan could result in billions of dollars in savings as well as better community health, she said.” [….]
“Nearly two dozen community members spoke to council about the goals, with most in favor. Some residents said the city needs to take a leadership role in addressing climate change. Others said the devastating impacts of climate change are observable every day around the world.”
http://www.coloradoan.com/story/news/2015/03/04/council-boosts-greenhouse-gas-goals/24358179/
One problem is that AGW is an easy thing to portray – a simple statement of the problem (CO2 gasses, now conveniently described as “carbon pollution”) combined with predictions of doom that hit people’s emotions. Skepticism, on the other hand, requires actually looking at the data. Its dry and hard for ordinary people to understand. So AGW gets the upper hand. Appealing to people’s emotions wins every time.
They could massively cut emissions by timing the traffic lights instead of making you stop at every single light on College Avenue.
Oh God please, lets not get into THAT! As the driver of a heavy vehicle that can seem to take forever to get rolling again after a stop I have years of pent up frustration I could vent on that very subject.
AMEN!
Obama had to find the one person that is dumber than he is to be his VP. This way Barry looks smart by comparison.
Darn it, hit the wrong comments link. This goes in the article above.
It make Barry impeachment proof. That was the whole idea.
I like the original plan. No parties. First place is president and second place is VP. That makes impeachment ATTRACTIVE and therefore keeps people more honest. No wonder that method had to be ditched.
That, and a repeal of the 17th Amendment.
Missed it by two!
The Fifteenth Amendment (Amendment XV) to the United States Constitution prohibits the federal and state governments from denying a citizen the right to vote based on that citizen’s “race, color, or previous condition of servitude.” It was ratified on February 3, 1870, as the third and last of the Reconstruction Amendments.
The Nineteenth Amendment (Amendment XIX) to the United States Constitution prohibits any United States citizen from being denied the right to vote on the basis of sex. It was ratified on August 18, 1920. The Constitution allows the states to determine the qualifications of voters, subject to limitations imposed by later amendments. Until the 1910s, most states disenfranchised women. The amendment was the culmination of the women’s suffrage movement in the United States, which fought at both state and national levels to achieve the vote. It effectively overruled Minor v. Happersett, in which a unanimous Supreme Court ruled that the Fourteenth Amendment did not give women the right to vote.
Huh?
The 17th Amendment, The Federal Reserve Act and The Sixteenth Amendment, allowing the Congress to levy an income tax, are what started the downhill slide of the USA in 1913.
Time to kill all three.
It started before 1913, which is why we had the ‘Chautauqua Movement’ of the late 19th century. Education, religion, and arts were on a downward slide and this movement was the response.
There is an original Chautauqua community about two miles from my property, with a bandstand where Sousa used to play, and the village has gone virtually unchanged to this day.
Gator, I know it started well before 1913. link
1913 is the year they finally managed to take over the USA after years and years of trying. We were conquered by stealth in that year and never even knew it. The country has been enslaved ever since.
What we are seeing now is the consolidation of the assets by our conquerers. The first thing of course is to get rid of the elderly. The do not buy consumer goods, they are smart, they have the leisure to figure out things and most of all they are a net drag on profits via pensions, Social Security and Medicare. As I have documented many times, the Fabian Socialists running the UK are doing a right good job of killing off their pensioners.
Rosa Paints a nasty picture of the Agenda 21 future rushing towards us.
http://38.media.tumblr.com/cd19ab0784b9a30c2d667a266614cef1/tumblr_nf03dqaPCy1qz4s6ho1_1280.jpg
Hey Gail! That picture with the cattle cameras reminded me of an article I recently read about the police state of Singapore. The author described waiting rooms with up to eight cameras. Then I ran across this…
“Singaporeans aren’t happy. If we had to bet we would’ve put our money on North Korea, but a recent Gallup poll insists that Singaporeans have the least positive emotions in the world. Based on calls and in-person interviews with 1,000 adults in 148 countries, Gallup researchers found that Singaporeans were the least likely to report positive emotions. They didn’t think they were treated with respect, didn’t report laughing or smiling, said they had trouble getting rest, and said they didn’t get much enjoyment out of their day”.
This is exactly what the author (a fellow backpacker) said was his experience with Singaporeans. They seemed dead inside.
It’s a joke about women being allowed to vote ruining everything. For instance: no presidents with facial hair since then. Also, a rapist got two terms as president.
Gator, The Singaporeans know they are prisoners with no hope of anything better. At least if you are in jail for anything but murder you have the hope of freedom in the future.
All the crud I have seen coming down the pike for the last 15-20 years has made it hard to get enthusiastic about the things I am doing. Why put a lot of effort and money into something when there is a good chance the government will regulated it and then confiscate everything you own on trumped up charges?
Walter Jefferies about ten years ago had a Post for farmers. “Don’t let them steal your dreams” That was back when we were fighting National Animal ID. That was nothing compared to now. It has just gotten worse and worse.
Walter’s site is now closed but Darrol’s is still up and running.
http://www.naisstinks.com/wordpress/
And so is Gizelle’s
http://xstatic99645.tripod.com/naisinfocentral/index.html
I’m not so sure the 19th Amendment ruined everything. For instance, after women were allowed to vote, we repealed the 18th amendment. Of course that may have been because of the 19th Amendment…
Hey, guys
Who would you rather have voting. Me or David Appell.
Not worried about David, he wouldn’t be able to figure out the voting machine. I think his cat actually logs on his computer for him.
+1
snicker
Now a pretty good argument could be for repeal of the the first section of the14th amendment. It has been the basis of much over reach by the Federal Government over the states in many ways.
Actually the overreach came when FDR threatened the Supreme Court to get a very very broad interpretation of the Commerce Clause.
The Commerce Clause: Route to Omnipotent Government
I really really hate FDR. If I ever head up to the Boston area again to visit relatives, I might detour to Poughkeepsie NY to dance on the S.O.B.’s grave.
Gail Row V. Wade, busing, religious displays and monuments, the display of the 10 commandments on public property, all come back to the Federal court system and have been taken out of the hands of States by the 14th amendment. It has become a tool for the so called “secularists” for the denigration of the moral foundation this country was founded on.
Marbury vs. Madison. Yuck.
rah,
The USA was SUPPOSED to have trial by jury. This was the major check on idiotic legislation. However as usual it was trashed.
The 6th and 11th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and Article 3 Section 2 give US citizens the right to a trial. As Joan Biskupic stated
”
How the politicians have gotten around the US Constitution to make sure citizens are denied their right to a trial. The method used is to overload the system with idiotic laws so there is no way to have a trial for every single person caught and charged with a ‘crime’. That allows an excuse to ‘streamline’ the system.
So there went our last constraint on the Federal government. Without a trial by jury we lost our RIGHT to overrule idiotic laws and regulations.
There’s a light, a light in the darkness of everybody’s life. When I get excommunicated for heresy, I hope that you will all consider that it is not Obama, it is not progressive insanity that you all hate, it is climatology truth. The truth that you want to deny. It is truth that smoking causes cancer. It is the truth that carbon emissions causes a rise in our global temperature. It is the truth that in spite of the phoney pictures from the moon, we actually landed there, and it is the truth that our current president was born in Hawaii.
Anita is that you?
Simply because your savior and army have arrived, are not good reasons to give up on your prescribed medications.
That constant lip licking gives your issue away!
1. Smoking does not always cause cancer. But it is a contributor, that seems to have been scientifically established.
2. The contribution of CO2 to the tiny insignificant atmospheric warming we might have had, has NEVER been scientifically established.
It is NOT a truth.
It is an un-validate supposition… and all real unadjusted data suggests it is NOT a contributor.
Maybe if you actually spent some time, first learning some basic science, then applying real scientific method to your unsubstantiated belief system, you would not be so utterly GULLIBLE !!
Well said , Andy. Many examples of people who have smoked all their lives and no cancer. I have some friends who have developed lung cancer yet no second hand smoke or particularly polluted environment. There seems to be some genetic predisposition for cancer,. Breast cancer, for one example. As has been said by others, CO2 is the elixir of life on our planet . There is nothing more terrifying than bad science or science with an agenda.
And yes, there is definitely a darkness in your life, a sort of grey empty mess.
I would pity you if I could be bothered.
Egad man, if you realized the stimulus for a wide variety of cancerous tumor growth, you’d be running a different drill!
The ELF (50 & 60 Hz) “E” and “H” fields that smack you daily are not in the best interest of your health and those with empirical knowledge have known that for more than 40 years.
If your kind wanted to help man-kind, they’d demand that all three-phase ELF systems be buried (with 120 degree cancellation in grounded conduit), which would spark a real shovel ready job sequence and health benefit along with an end to perpetual welfare for all!
Reblogged this on Edonurwayup's Blog and commented:
Just good people.