This is a fairly typical climate study from academia. They definitively determined the motivations of people fighting the climate crisis scam, apparently without actually talking to any of the people they claimed to be studying. Had they done that, they might have learned that science doesn’t support their climate religion.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “I’ve dealt with him before ”
- “I’ve dealt with him before.”
- “BE HONEST”
- Turn Out The Lights – The Party’s Over
- Net Zero In The UK
- Turn Out The Lights, The Party Is Over
- Michael Mann Again
- Over The Target
- Michael Mann’s Latest Research
- “an amazing documentary dismantling the climate change theory”
- The World’s Greatest Climate Scientist Speaks Out
- Startling New Revelation
- Just An Illusion
- Climate Conditioning
- Fact Checking Reuters
- No Correlation
- I Offended Their Religion
- The High Priest Has Forbidden Questioning His Religion
- Hiding And Rewriting History
- Fact-Free Economist
- Academic Tipping Points
- Desperate Academics
- Climate Misinformation
- Unreliable And Toxic
- Unreliable And Toxic
Recent Comments
- Billyjack on “BE HONEST”
- Francis Barnett on “BE HONEST”
- Gordon Vigurs on “I’ve dealt with him before.”
- Bruce on “I’ve dealt with him before.”
- arn on “I’ve dealt with him before.”
- Mango Thonotosassa on “I’ve dealt with him before.”
- rah on “I’ve dealt with him before.”
- Francis Barnett on Michael Mann Again
- Robertvd on “BE HONEST”
- Conrad Ziefle on Net Zero In The UK