If people worried about global warming spent more time outdoors, perhaps they would have a more realistic view of the world.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “a globally renowned scholar”
- ” Climate change may be coming for your house”
- “The Floridian quakes with apprehension”
- Milton Propaganda
- “Yes … definitely”
- “Antarctica has turned green”
- Rapidly Intensifying Hurricanes
- Kamala Can Prevent Hurricanes
- The Ultimate Global Warming Test
- “ready for the next one”
- Combining Science And Religion
- 500 Million Years Of Warmer Temperatures
- “Arctic sea ice is headed toward a historic low”
- “Record winter low”
- Kamala Planning Another Half Trillion Dollars For Ukraine
- “the science is absolutely certain”
- Electricity Is Proportional To CO2
- AI Climate Math
- AI Math
- Al Gore’s Arctic Forecast
- Mann Says He Was Correct
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “under the Intermediate Scenario”
- “carbon emissions may have now peaked”
- Record Arctic Sea Ice Growth
Recent Comments
- Disillusioned on “a globally renowned scholar”
- conrad ziefle on “a globally renowned scholar”
- Bob G on “a globally renowned scholar”
- Russell Cook on “a globally renowned scholar”
- arn on “a globally renowned scholar”
- Bill Odom on “a globally renowned scholar”
- Richard E Fritz on “a globally renowned scholar”
- William on “a globally renowned scholar”
- William on “a globally renowned scholar”
- D. Boss on ” Climate change may be coming for your house”
Someone suggested that if any of these lamebrained governments actually sued the oil companies, then the oil companies (energy companies, because they invest in all forms of energy production) should immediately stop selling oil products within the jurisdiction of that governmental entity. Maybe post some ads in the papers explaining why they stopped.
YouTube still persists with that Wikipedia definition of global warming. The IPPC definition is of the difference between outgoing and incoming radiation. Whilst this might be possible transiently, if integrated up over time, such a discrepancy would credit greenhouse gases with the magical property of generating energy from nothing. I find it strange how ‘;irrefutable settled science’ contravenes what is probably the most fundamental principle of physics.
the entire fundamental physics and science is out the window- the IPCC- Bernie AOC Horse face Kerry & entire DNC and EU want POWER and Control
The difference between incoming energy and outgoing energy is the energy gain or loss of the system. When you look at Earth, the energy gain or loss would be hard to figure out. How much energy does Earth have, to its core? How much heat gain, if you can decide what that is, is from the sun, and how much is not really gain, but just a transfer from the core outward? Can you really measure the outflow of energy from the system when you can’t model clouds accurately, and that is just one mechanism that is poorly modeled? In the end, these climate shamans just look like a whack-a-mole (not is a chemical way) Dr. Seuss character.
Since “climate change” is attributed to world-wide CO2 emissions, then Vermont is attempting to hold the entire world responsible for Vermont. What a bunch of maroons.