“This mean that both Greenland and Antarctica are probably going to melt faster than the scientific community previously thought,” co-author Jonathan T. Overpeck said in a statement.
Overpeck, co-director of the University of Arizona’s Institute of the Environment, said: “This paper adds to the evidence that we could have sea level rise by the end of this century of around 1 meter and a good deal more in succeeding centuries.”
The subsurface ocean along the Greenland coast could warm as much as 3.6 degrees Fahrenheit (2 Celsius) by 2100, the researchers reported.
This means that these researchers could probably be more desperate for funding than the skeptic community previously thought.
Steve, do you know if they made any adjustments to Envisat in late 2009?
I don’t think it was actually reading sea level before………..
Nothing very super-exponential looking about that chart.
Nevermind, I found it…. in their 2008 annual report
Seems the first ~21 cycles of Envisat showed decreasing sea levels….and that didn’t jive with Jason, they didn’t believe Envisat was telling the truth, so they “adjusted” Envisat to match Jason….
….which made Envisat show sea levels rising, not falling any more
That’s what I thought, because Envisat is showing the exact same sea level rise as GOCE.
The morons adjusted Envisat to read gravity……………
Envisat is showing sea levels falling because it never showed sea levels rising in the first place.
They adjusted it again in 2008……. in the report starting at 7.1.2.
JASON? You mean the same dataset that shows Palau should probably be underwater by now?
I believe your “Could Probably” is not a Robust enough claim because the latest research from the entire Climatologist community proves they are desperate for funding. There are signs of a consensus that they want more funding and it is a “Travesty” they can not find more gullible people to increase their funding.