They have had the same guy for over a week now. That might be a new record for Abramovich.
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Analyzing The Western Water Crisis
- Gaslighting 1924
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
Recent Comments
- Bob G on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- arn on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Bob G on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- arn on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Bob G on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Bob G on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Gordon Vigurs on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- arn on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- arn on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
- Gordon Vigurs on The Real Hockey Stick Graph
Survey shows skeptics are smarter
Last week, an intriguing study emerged from Dan Kahan and his colleagues at Yale and elsewhere–finding that knowing more about science, and being better at mathematical reasoning, was related to more climate science skepticism and denial–rather than less.
http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1871503&http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1871503
h/t Jo Nova http://joannenova.com.au/2011/07/survey-shows-skeptics-are-smarter/#more-15851http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1871503&http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1871503
But he hasn’t lost his first match yet Steve!
🙂