“It’s not helpful to have people disputing science”
– Jane Goodall
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- “Why Do You Resist?”
- Climate Attribution Model
- Fact Checking NASA
- Fact Checking Grok
- Fact Checking The New York Times
- New Visitech Features
- Ice-Free Arctic By 2014
- Debt-Free US Treasury Forecast
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
Recent Comments
- Gerald Machnee on Fact Checking The New York Times
- Gerald Machnee on Climate Attribution Model
- Gerald Machnee on “Why Do You Resist?”
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
- Gordon Vigurs on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- Bob G on Climate Attribution Model
- arn on Climate Attribution Model
It can be risky and dangerous to dispute scientists.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_cLmuPluSqE
Sad to see Jane on the AGW bandwagon. She showed that Apes in general were more
like us than we ever imagined. She wrote that down, even f the data didn’t fit the theory.
But , Dogma or the susceptibility to it must be ingrained.
Like when her chimp troop broke up and one side became”they who live by the
river and peel bananas with their feet!” and war,ensued.
She has her Banana at the ready here…