Panetta: We’ve Lost Track of Some Syrian Chemical Weapons
Friday, September 28, 2012
The U.S. has lost track of some of Syria’s chemical weapons, Defense Secretary Leon Panetta said Friday, and does not know if any potentially lethal chemicals have fallen into the hands of Syrian rebels or Iranian forces inside the country.
Syria’s chemical weapons are top concern for the U.S. and for regional allies worried that they could lbe stolen by rebels or terrorists organizations, or given to Iran for safekeeping.
Panetta: We’ve Lost Track of Some Syrian Chemical Weapons | The E-Ring
Disrupting the Borg is expensive and time consuming!
Google Search
-
Recent Posts
- Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- Analyzing Big City Crime
- UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Climate Attribution In Greece
- “Brown: ’50 days to save world'”
- The Catastrophic Influence of Bovine Methane Emissions on Extraterrestrial Climate Patterns
- Posting On X
- Seventeen Years Of Fun
- The Importance Of Good Tools
- Temperature Shifts At Blue Hill, MA
- CO2²
- Time Of Observation Bias
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Climate Scamming For Profit
- Back To The Future
- “records going back to 1961”
- Analyzing Rainfall At Asheville
- Historical Weather Analysis With Visitech
- “American Summers Are Starting to Feel Like Winter”
- Joker And Midnight Toker
- Cheering Crowds
- Understanding Flood Mechanisms
- Extreme Weather
- 70C At Lisbon
- Grok Defending The Climate Scam
Recent Comments
- John Francis on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Stuart Hamish on Extreme Weather
- Bob G on Analyzing Big City Crime
- arn on Analyzing Big City Crime
- Gordon Vigurs on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Gordon Vigurs on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
- conrad ziefle on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- arn on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- Robertvd on UK Migration Caused By Global Warming
- scott allen on Analyzing Big City Crime (Part 2)
And under those conditions, we’re now supposed to believe the Assad regime would be stupid enough to use such weapons–apparently, just as a cheap thrill, because it’s already winning its internal war. How would it expect to benefit–which, to any reasonably skeptical mind, leads to the question, who DOES benefit?
I have been saying this ever since the attack occurred. We are foolish if we get into this conflict now. It’s a lose, lose situation as I posted this morning. Keep up the good work in getting the info out to the uninformed.